Mafiascum.net

In post 223, eagerSnake wrote:

In post 220, Dwlee99 wrote:Being able to read how genuine someone's posting is makes tojam feel like such obvious scum. All of their posts seem forced.

"their"

I apologize for using gender neutral pronouns?
???

In post 222, Creature wrote:idk, maybe we can just lynch tojam2, LQ and DotW in that order.

I doubt anyone else is scum.

That is just not smart at all. Why are you lining up lynches? Why that order? Why are you so confident in your reads on like day 4?

Nvm, I can't determine what tojam2 is trying to do.

Okay it sounded when I read it like you were talking about a party and not a singular so I was looking for clarification thanks

In post 226, LicketyQuickety wrote:That is just not smart at all.

Yeah, you need to keep your mislynch options open apparently.

Why are you lining up lynches?

Because I am confident on them.

Why that order?

It doesn't have to be in that order, maybe if you stop trying to discredit my reads I might change the order.

Why are you so confident in your reads on like day 4?

Why are you ignoring my reasoning posts?

Oh pfftt LQ. Youve never been confident in your reads beford?

Right now I still say tojam and creature are the scummiest. And does anyone else have a scummy read on me? Because creature has been quietly pushing to make me seem like scum but I haven't seen anyone else suggest that or agree with it

In post 231, Dragon of the West wrote:Because creature has been

quietly pushing

to make me seem like scum

but I haven't seen anyone else suggest that or agree with it

lol

In post 227, Creature wrote:Nvm, I can't determine what tojam2 is trying to do.

And now you are backing away from the read. *pukes*

P-Edit: you clearly are not confident of your reads. The fact that you back out of your read on tom is evidence of this. And why exactly do I need to agree with your reads? You are not confirmed town (far from it) so to say that because I don't agree with your reads means I am scum is a complete wtf.

P-Edit: Dwlee, I have and been both right and wrong on them.

Well, I am considering you a VI right now seeing DotW's obviously faked post 231.

What about it is faked?

In post 221, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 215, Creature wrote:

In post 206, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.

In post 202, Creature wrote:Not fan of how you and LQ are trying to doubtcast CCM's townslip, "you easily could have been buddying with LQ"

Also, your post 197 sounded like you know I am town.

Honestly I find it interesting that it was just coincidence that crazy "derp cleared" himself by using terminology that you have (loosely) used.

Or crazycrabman could've noticed me mentioning "scum PM" and thought mafia communicate between themselves through "scum PM"

I'm not ruling that out. But it would be nice to know for sure.

@crazycrabman, have you played forum mafia elsewhere where scum communicate via PM?

Good Morning!

Nope, I haven't even played forum mafia before this. I have played mafia in real life but the scum never communicate there.

In post 234, Creature wrote:Well, I am considering you a VI right now seeing DotW's obviously faked post 231.

You said he was Sus because of the L-1 vote correct? Explain how you got that he was VI based on 231.

In post 236, crazycrabman wrote:

In post 221, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 215, Creature wrote:

In post 206, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.

In post 202, Creature wrote:Not fan of how you and LQ are trying to doubtcast CCM's townslip, "you easily could have been buddying with LQ"

Also, your post 197 sounded like you know I am town.

Honestly I find it interesting that it was just coincidence that crazy "derp cleared" himself by using terminology that you have (loosely) used.

Or crazycrabman could've noticed me mentioning "scum PM" and thought mafia communicate between themselves through "scum PM"

I'm not ruling that out. But it would be nice to know for sure.

@crazycrabman, have you played forum mafia elsewhere where scum communicate via PM?

Good Morning!

Nope, I haven't even played forum mafia before this. I have played mafia in real life but the scum never communicate there.

Why did you assume scum communicate via PM?

In post 237, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 234, Creature wrote:Well, I am considering you a VI right now seeing DotW's obviously faked post 231.

You said he was Sus because of the L-1 vote correct? Explain how you got that he was VI based on 231.

I am saying you're a VI.

In post 239, Creature wrote:

In post 237, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 234, Creature wrote:Well, I am considering you a VI right now seeing DotW's obviously faked post 231.

You said he was Sus because of the L-1 vote correct? Explain how you got that he was VI based on 231.

I am saying you're a VI.

I am not a VI, don't call me that again.

Atm and Eagersnake get avatars please

In post 235, Dwlee99 wrote:What about it is faked?

He said I was pushing him to make him look like he's scum, which is wrong, I've been pushing.

He thinks I am scum because nobody else has the same feeling.

It's obviously a made-up case.

In post 238, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 236, crazycrabman wrote:

In post 221, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 215, Creature wrote:

In post 206, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.

In post 202, Creature wrote:Not fan of how you and LQ are trying to doubtcast CCM's townslip, "you easily could have been buddying with LQ"

Also, your post 197 sounded like you know I am town.

Honestly I find it interesting that it was just coincidence that crazy "derp cleared" himself by using terminology that you have (loosely) used.

Or crazycrabman could've noticed me mentioning "scum PM" and thought mafia communicate between themselves through "scum PM"

I'm not ruling that out. But it would be nice to know for sure.

@crazycrabman, have you played forum mafia elsewhere where scum communicate via PM?

Good Morning!

Nope, I haven't even played forum mafia before this. I have played mafia in real life but the scum never communicate there.

Why did you assume scum communicate via PM?

Well now I assume otherwise. When I was writing the message, I saw it as there being no other alternative. They wouldn't communicate through a forum because I assumed all forums were public. As we got our roles through PM, I assumed that PM would be the means by which scum communicate.

Im going to wait for dragon's response

What is a VI?

In post 243, crazycrabman wrote:Well now I assume otherwise. When I was writing the message, I saw it as there being no other alternative. They wouldn't communicate through a forum because I assumed all forums were public. As we got our roles through PM, I assumed that PM would be the means by which scum communicate.

Ok I legit think you slipped now. But why do you "assume otherwise" now?

In post 245, crazycrabman wrote:What is a VI?

Village Idiot.

In post 246, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 243, crazycrabman wrote:Well now I assume otherwise. When I was writing the message, I saw it as there being no other alternative. They wouldn't communicate through a forum because I assumed all forums were public. As we got our roles through PM, I assumed that PM would be the means by which scum communicate.

Ok I legit think you slipped now. But why do you "assume otherwise" now?

I misread your post as "why do you" instead of "why did you" and was clarifying that I believe otherwise now.

In post 232, Creature wrote:

In post 231, Dragon of the West wrote:Because creature has been

quietly pushing

to make me seem like scum

but I haven't seen anyone else suggest that or agree with it

lol

I'm not using that as the case against you, I was just trying to figure out why you were putting me on your scum reads. What I said there is true, I haven't seen anyone else scum read me. Let me go back through the thread to make sure I'm not wrong about that