Mafiascum.net

nah on that scale it's a 1.5

Cakez what do you think of MC?

I'd acquiesce to smith but murder has been bad all day.

In post 220, SirCakez wrote:

In post 143, Smithereens wrote:"woah, l-1 legit on page 6? No no no, I'm not saying podo isn't scum but it seems more likely that this is a scum driven wagon. Could be both."

if this isn't a guilty mindset that betrays you already knew you were voting a townie, Idk what is.

This stinks, multiple other people have the same mindset here and you only jump on Shotty for it?

Consider that you're wrong lol. This post by Shotty is the only post in the game like it.

In post 227, Transcend wrote:I'd acquiesce to smith but murder has been bad all day.

I don't know what you are on about, as far as I can see most people are town reading me. Did you see my last post to you?

In post 214, MURDERCAT wrote:I don't really understand what you are accusing me of. I said I agree that Ranger not changing reads is strange. I implied it might be because Ranger can be lazy as scum (my experience with her suggests this is the case). What's the issue?

Expect a good post later tonight, but I have cell service real quick so I skimmed. Whoever said I'm frustrated townie, you're close. I'm frustrated all the time as any alignment. So that time you're reading is definitely the tone of someone frustrated with having to deal with the rest of humanity

Transcend wrote:i really find it hard to believe that your reads are unchanged after 66.

So did I! But that list, quite literally, is still my exact thoughts on every player. Nothing changed. Reasons did, so it wasn't like it was pure fluff posting between 66 and 196. The basis for the reads became different off of the content. But the actual of players did not change.

Murdercat wrote:I implied it might be because Ranger can be lazy as scum (my experience with her suggests this is the case).

Lazy is literally my playstyle.

Where do you think I got into the habit of posting nothing but readslists in the first place?

SirCakez wrote:Why do I feel like you're barely doing anything here?

Because I'm barely doing anything here?

DixC wrote:Ranger, comparing post rates and updates I see a significant difference in this game: what are some queries that might help you out here?

Mostly, talking to others. I suppose talking to me is not without benefits, but I can't think of anything. Like I said, largely reactionary.
{karnos, Aneninen}
{SirCakez}
{Smithereens, shotty, Chip Butty, Murdercat}
{DixC}
{Maruchan, Transcend}
{podoboq, PenguinPower}

I like Ranger's list.

I assume we aren't going to get much in term of reasoning for the vote (Ranger feel free to let us know how Penguin moved down despite not posting) so let's just wagon here and see what happens.

VOTE: Penguin

Oh there was 203. What makes you dislike that post Ranger?

In post 226, Transcend wrote:Cakez what do you think of MC?

Haven't paid much attention to him. Lemme reread.

In post 232, Ranger wrote:

SirCakez wrote:Why do I feel like you're barely doing anything here?

Because I'm barely doing anything here?

Pls do more then.

Took a quick ISO dive, also looked at Penguin since he's getting votes
MC is nulltown, Penguin is a heavy scumread

VOTE: cakes
I find it hugely scummy when you are trying to get others to produce content when your content is eh and rather than do anything your self you just seem to sheep and demand the opinion of others.

p edit
oh what a surprise the latest wagon you are scum reading, but are carefully not yet voting eh

I get a definitive scum read from the two players who are more inactive than I and without good reason. Bad reads and I'd be inclined to believe you were both scum if that wasn't so obvious a play. Love being paired up with someone I wagoned to L-1 and was one of the last ones to jump off from. *golf clap*

As I said before, I'm torn between Ranger and Smithereens. This isn't a retaliatory vote...I just don't agree with her readlist at all, and its too easy to claim "lazy is my play style." Glad the readlist changed though.

VOTE: Ranger

w/e

still wanna rope murder

VOTE: smith

Did you miss this post?

In post 229, MURDERCAT wrote:Did you see my last post to you?

In post 214, MURDERCAT wrote:I don't really understand what you are accusing me of. I said I agree that Ranger not changing reads is strange. I implied it might be because Ranger can be lazy as scum (my experience with her suggests this is the case). What's the issue?

i've read it.

FYI for anyone who didn't know, this is PenguinPower's first game here. When you look at his iso, make sure you don't mix up newbie awkwardness with actual legitimate scum tells.

That said, who knows, maybe he did draw scum in his first game. I'd vote him, but I think smithereens is a step worse.

why do you think smithereens is a bad lynch at all?

I don't. I am voting smithereens.

In post 243, karnos wrote:but I think smithereens is a step worse.

i assume you meant "better" then?

Worse as in more scummy.

misunderstood the context there bud.

i'm with you on that one. (as indicated by my vote)

@Trans, If you think I'm a scum read I'd recommend this informative book to you by Dr Seuss and it's called Learn To Read.

Still unsure about Karnos though. Might be misguided townie who thinks he's onto something or generic scum.