Mafiascum.net

In post 222, probs a robot wrote:I would support it, patching in Gamma Emerald instead of TDW and pending further interactions with TesXX in particular.

you would support it?

that raises an interesting question that i'd like to put out to everyone: who would be willing to support a coalition that didn't contain themselves in it?

In post 220, skitter30 wrote:which psots of mine do are you skeptical of?

I'm skeptical of posts where you have a long wallpost that gives the impression of some thought or structure but then include questions that are answered already, it makes it seem like you're deliberately making really long posts without really investigating what's going on in the thread and staying very surface level with some of your most direct questions

In post 225, northsidegal wrote:who would be willing to support a coalition that didn't contain themselves in it?

I would not frankly

In post 223, DVa wrote:You accuse me of not seeing a strong explanation of your coalition when you said they were "kinda townie" in a way that was also possibly "lynchbait-y"?

You made it seem like there was a stronger towncase than that

i mean you asked me what i think about them
i had already said what i thought about them
i think it's kinda stranage of you to ask me what i think about them (implying you didn't see what i had already said) but also saying you dont' like my posts (implying that you're reading them)

if i strongly townread them i'd be healing them rn
i don't so i'm not

In post 224, skitter30 wrote:why do you like gamma?

yeah posts like this are why I'm skeptical of you

you clearly haven't played with me before

I do strongly suspect that Tes is town, unless he is scum with skitter.
In reality, I do not believe he has produced enough to be adequately read as either alignment in isolation. Skitter's read on him, however, does sound informed. Whether via meta or in-game alignment remains to be properly proven. But I know which way I feel.

Preview edit:

northsidegal wrote:

In post 222, probs a robot wrote:I would support it, patching in Gamma Emerald instead of TDW and pending further interactions with TesXX in particular.

you would support it?

that raises an interesting question that i'd like to put out to everyone: who would be willing to support a coalition that didn't contain themselves in it?

Yes. I will always maintain this is fine.

In post 228, skitter30 wrote:if i strongly townread them i'd be healing them rn
i don't so i'm not

yeah I asked for a name you would sub in for a game-winning coalition and you gave me two names that you aren't even healing and then are surprised when I ask you to expand on them

so yeah, a lot of what you're doing rn seems reachy

How rude of that scary skull emoji to slip into my post. Sigh.

if not completely unavoidable I would not support a coalition that didn't contain me in it because of two reasons
1) having at least one specific town guaranteed to be outside of the coalition drastically ups the odds that it contains scum and
and 2) if the coalition is wrong me being in it means that i have 4 slots of the townblock to sift through as opposed to 5.

i am surprised that of all the people in this game i am the one being floated as a deep wolf.

@northsidegal, do you see what I see with town!DVa? I am seriously reconsidering my current read on her.

In post 230, skitter30 wrote:you clearly haven't played with me before

I wanna say I saw an argument fairly similar to this in the last game where a scum was trying to rationalize irrational choices

In post 226, DVa wrote:

In post 220, skitter30 wrote:which psots of mine do are you skeptical of?

I'm skeptical of posts where you have a long wallpost that gives the impression of some thought or structure but then include questions that are answered already, it makes it seem like you're deliberately making really long posts without really investigating what's going on in the thread and staying very surface level with some of your most direct questions

i wallpost, especially if i'm coming back after being gone for a bit
i don't think i ever go back and edit out quetions tbh, even if it was addressed later
i idsagree that i'm not investigating what's going on in the thread
and sometimes i ask surface-level questions to prod things

i asked about gamma because i'm interested in hearing why robot likes gamma (who i'm null on) more than anybody else in that list (which i mostly townread except for maybe raya) so i'd like to hear why he has a strong read on there

DVa is incredibly wolfy in so many different ways and you trying to sneak her through into the townblock makes me feel even more strongly that you're her wolf partner.

In post 225, northsidegal wrote:that raises an interesting question that i'd like to put out to everyone: who would be willing to support a coalition that didn't contain themselves in it?

possibly depending who was in it and how strongly i townread them
can't say for sure rn because i don't really townread anybody like that atm

In post 234, The Dark Wanderer wrote:if not completely unavoidable I would not support a coalition that didn't contain me in it because of two reasons
1) having at least one specific town guaranteed to be outside of the coalition drastically ups the odds that it contains scum and
and 2) if the coalition is wrong me being in it means that i have 4 slots of the townblock to sift through as opposed to 5.

i am surprised that of all the people in this game i am the one being floated as a deep wolf.

it's moreso that i'm just saying that if you scum more than anyone else we'd be screwed right now.

In post 235, probs a robot wrote:@northsidegal, do you see what I see with town!DVa? I am seriously reconsidering my current read on her.

not really right now, although i might get back to you sometime tomorrow when i'm a bit more conscious and can read closer.

In post 237, skitter30 wrote:i asked about gamma because i'm interested in hearing why robot likes gamma

you didn't pedit an @robot then?

I was the previous poster

In post 236, DVa wrote:

In post 230, skitter30 wrote:you clearly haven't played with me before

I wanna say I saw an argument fairly similar to this in the last game where a scum was trying to rationalize irrational choices

In post 229, DVa wrote:

In post 224, skitter30 wrote:why do you like gamma?

yeah posts like this are why I'm skeptical of you

i wanna say that the last time i saw someone use this as a reason to scumread me they were scum so
(ruby red)

In post 238, The Dark Wanderer wrote:DVa is incredibly wolfy

I love it when you talk like this

winky face

really though, which posts are wolfy?

In post 241, DVa wrote:

In post 237, skitter30 wrote:i asked about gamma because i'm interested in hearing why robot likes gamma

you didn't pedit an @robot then?

I was the previous poster

you posted just before me
i didn't see your post beore i submitted it; it was directed to robot if that wasn't clear

In post 149, probs a robot wrote:

In post 147, DVa wrote:I'm DVa, fam, of course I'm friendly with MEKA! :3

Is this the appropriate time to suggest a bump of fists?
Ah... alas, I have no fists...

This is just the best thing ever

In post 238, The Dark Wanderer wrote:DVa is incredibly wolfy in so many different ways and you trying to sneak her through into the townblock makes me feel even more strongly that you're her wolf partner.

who was this addressed to? robot?

In post 156, northsidegal wrote:

In post 124, Gamma Emerald wrote:eddie cane?
I like this alt btw

what makes you think that our friend the robot (probably) is mr edward canery?

this is not game related, just wondering. haven't seen eddie cane in a while

Posting style when I strip away the robotic quirks.

In post 246, skitter30 wrote:

In post 238, The Dark Wanderer wrote:DVa is incredibly wolfy in so many different ways and you trying to sneak her through into the townblock makes me feel even more strongly that you're her wolf partner.

who was this addressed to? robot?

yes i was talking to robot

In post 244, skitter30 wrote:you posted just before me
i didn't see your post beore i submitted it; it was directed to robot if that wasn't clear

I mean, you're probably telling the truth
but part of me almost is like, are you lying and you just didn't want to admit you didn't see my last response on this exact question

I believe you but it would have helped if you had done a pedit there, because it was not contextually obvious