Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2019 1:25 pm
You don't believe the things that you're pushing me for. You're either making stuff up because you want something that sounds better to push me for, or you're scum.
What stupid and disgusting thing am I supposedly saying? I'm being rather tame. I've reacted to these situations far worse in the past. I'm just over it.In post 224, momo wrote:you are scum, you act angry, say something is stupid or disgusting, and expect your idea to go through. That's what you're doing now.
"RC, the real reason I think you're scum isn't based around inactivity (though that's a contributing factor). It's just that you have literally said before that because of your meta, you have to take charge, both as town, and scum pretending to be down.In post 225, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:You don't believe the things that you're pushing me for. You're either making stuff up because you want something that sounds better to push me for, or you're scum.
I meant that you say someone else's idea is stupid or disgustingIn post 226, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:What stupid and disgusting thing am I supposedly saying? I'm being rather tame. I've reacted to these situations far worse in the past. I'm just over it.In post 224, momo wrote:you are scum, you act angry, say something is stupid or disgusting, and expect your idea to go through. That's what you're doing now.
Killing a D5 IC on N1?? Over an Inventor & a Gladiator??In post 216, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:I also think that giving us the Day 5 IC removes any even slight motivation for scum to not kill us immediately.
This. His entire plan is based on a false assumption that he would be NKd. Over inventor, gladiator, and KING if that goes to town.In post 229, Almost50 wrote:Killing a D5 IC on N1?? Over an Inventor & a Gladiator??In post 216, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:I also think that giving us the Day 5 IC removes any even slight motivation for scum to not kill us immediately.
Sounds good.. but only if you and Maria are scum together. 2 slots guaranteed not to be lynched till D5!! I take back my unofficial proposal.In post 217, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:How does that sound?
That was my suggestion. Cause I can't read this hydra for shit.In post 231, Hidden Happiness wrote:I actually want the D5 role but I'd prefer you just give it to us as opposed to banking on someone dying for no reason.
I mean I don't care. I literally don't care. I want Momo dead, I'm just offering whatever safeties everyone else wants against me being scum.I actually want the D5 role but I'd prefer you just give it to us as opposed to banking on someone dying for no reason.
We are not keeping you alive until D5.In post 230, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:Ok the answer is scum, not bad town. That helps me feel less bad about it at least.
@everyone you can take whatever precautions you want about my scum game, ic, whatever, but we're lynching Momo today.
The RC patented raw arrogance just push it through everyone else is stupid method isn't going to work.In post 235, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:People have NKed me over known cops before, and won the game because they made that decision.
I mean I don't care. I literally don't care. I want Momo dead, I'm just offering whatever safeties everyone else wants against me being scum.I actually want the D5 role but I'd prefer you just give it to us as opposed to banking on someone dying for no reason.
I would like this idea more if the roles currently presented weren’t so underwhelming. I think scum are going to kill whoever is widely town read or fear the most regardless of how they’re distributed,In post 79, Vecna wrote:As a general guideline for how we go about this:
Id propose that people that usually get killed off early due to great gamesolving skills get the low impact or negative utility roles, to balance effectiveness of scum nightkills. No doubt thisll result in quite some discussion, which is exactly what the doctor ordered.
the main interesting ones that dont appear that interesting is what well do with the passives. Miller, VT, useless person, etc.
Scum are gonna try to make quick work of whoever they feel they can push easily, and I don’t think we have the luxury to wait around for someone to be confirmed town in a game like this. I think giving it someone who is unlikely to be lynched or night killed is much more optimal. It could force scum to kill a potential endgame option earlier then they would like to.In post 87, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why?In post 53, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:My guts says Cheeky should get the IC role.
In post 88, CheekyTeeky wrote:HH town.
And you’ve lost me here. What about their thought process? Does it feel real to you? If so, please consider the head who said it and then tell me why you think it’s AI.In post 90, CheekyTeeky wrote:Their thought process around allocation of roles that you regurgitated a couple of posts later.
I’m terrible in neighborhoods.In post 94, Saudade wrote:I bet LUV would love to be my neughbour
I can explain.In post 140, Almost50 wrote:Felt like a minor town slipIn post 50, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Didn’t realize that everyone must get roleIn post 5, callforjudgement wrote:Each role must be given to one player, and each player must get a role.
Turned my alarm back onIn post 52, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think timid and inactive should go to players who are lynch bait. Two of the towniest players should be neighbors.
No Beavis and Butthead slander shall prosper on my Mafiascum, they were a favorite.In post 194, popsofctown wrote:Ew, preflip associatives. Why do people do those? Especially day 1?
No one seems to see Vecna the same way as me huh. I wonder if I would read him differently with a different avatar. I hate that tv show.
My fear is that I don’t want inactive given to someone who easily gets disengaged or is showing signs of disengagement. Granted I don’t think that would be the case for town RC, since he would just replace out, but I wanted to put this out there in case your proposal doesn’t get chosen.In post 195, momo wrote:Baezu's silence, the connections in between my other scum reads and him. Especially paired with his normal activity, both in games and around sites. It would be a really smart move for scum RC to declare that he's going to lurk day one.In post 191, Almost50 wrote:@momo:
1- Why do you SR RC?
2- My point was "you can SR RC all you want, but getting him lynched w/o an explicit guilty is a pain in the arse", and I see no other investigative roles on the list top use on the slot.
Of my 3 SRs, I would probs lynch RC last. However, if any one of those two flip scum, the ties to RC become much stronger.
Either way, RC is very hard to read. The best use of theinactiverole, imo, would be for someone like RC. If he is town, then great. He can help us scum hunt and the incentives to lynch a player like RC would be much lower if we make him inactive. That way town RC stays alive and helps us.
If he is scum, then he can't use any abilities.
Giving RC inactive is probably the easiest decision we have to make today.
This also works out perfectly because the HH hydra is hard to read. Day 5, we get a confirmed read. Just swapping those two would make your proposal better.
It is a scumread. One that I'm confident enough in that I don't think we should keep you alive until D5 for.In post 238, Sothis Stefon Styx wrote:see
you act all innocent like 'hey i have this real scumread'
then there it is