Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:04 am
Occam’s Razor. The step from going “oh crap I think I am obvious, better play it up” seems like a large one.
Town doesn't actually lose when majority is lost. So if the game ends up 2v2 it depends who gets the votes off faster. A tie in votes will never result in a no strand. Even if the Mason were to be stranded the remaining townie can take a shot on the strongman. 1v1 also comes down to the faster vote. Stranded loses regardless.In post 207, Egduf wrote:Here’s the possible scenarios then
If the goon and strongman are in separate pairs:
The goon barricades, all town shoot. The only surviving player are the masons, town read, and the goon, the masons strand the goon and win.
The goon shoots, all town shoot. Everyone dies except the masons and the town read, we win.
The goon and strongman are in the same pair:
One of the masons/townread die, it’s 2v2, town lose.
The only times this plan fails is if we put both mafia members in the same pair, or if we get the one town read wrong. Having one strong town read is a pretty low bar to set for a plan, and the chance of mafia being in the same pair changes based on the number of players, but is pretty low. We should do better than random chance anyway, since the masons will be pairing people.
Also, something like this does not come from newbie!scum, it comes from newbie!town who doesn't understand theIn post 183, Gandalf wrote:I'm thinking Delta and Hectic could be Scum, plus someone who is being quiet.
Ahh strongman can't be stranded. It still ends in a draw if town isn't stranded 1v1.In post 231, Delta Klim wrote:Mafia win at 1v1, but Town can win at 2v2 if they strand the Goon.
I feel like this is the visual equivalent of listening to Bobcat Goldthwait.In post 229, Hectic wrote:Gandalf'sreallytown, the voting struggles with the BBCode was genuine, newbie!scum does not attempt something as over the top as that. His confusion about the Delta's strat is also reasonable for newbie!town who's never played a forum game before (let alone something asweirdas this one), others have sufficiently explained now though why scum would not counterclaim masons, and why the masons will be confirmed most of the time. I will now point myat Gandalf.FINGER OF LIKING
Most Serene has voted for me and thus I shall now place my vote on them.
VOTE: Vote: Vote: Vote: Most Serene
Malenque's logic on Gandalf and Ecafu being scum together seems a littledodgy, would like to hear himexpandon that.
In post 229, Hectic wrote:Most Serene has voted for me and thus I shall now place my vote on them.
Are you gonna be like this all game? Your answer decides if you live to day 2.In post 213, Most Serene wrote:Dude just because I said some naughty words doesn't mean I'm raging
Go do you a meta dive and then come back after you know where the bar is set
-k
???In post 239, Carl Tuckerson wrote:Are you gonna be like this all game? Your answer decides if you live to day 2.In post 213, Most Serene wrote:Dude just because I said some naughty words doesn't mean I'm raging
Go do you a meta dive and then come back after you know where the bar is set
-k
In post 234, Formerfish wrote:Fun fact: my only legit warning came from emulating kuribo in a post. Fun times!
In post 239, Carl Tuckerson wrote:Are you gonna be like this all game? Your answer decides if you live to day 2.In post 213, Most Serene wrote:Dude just because I said some naughty words doesn't mean I'm raging
Go do you a meta dive and then come back after you know where the bar is set
-k
is that a compliment or an insult?In post 241, Most Serene wrote:In post 234, Formerfish wrote:Fun fact: my only legit warning came from emulating kuribo in a post. Fun times!
You're not doing it right unless you've been banned for calling someone an inbred pigfucking jizz genius
In my 2nd game on the site, scum decided it made sense to be very combative and unhelpful and bank on people thinking scum would never do that.In post 240, Menalque wrote:???In post 239, Carl Tuckerson wrote:Are you gonna be like this all game? Your answer decides if you live to day 2.In post 213, Most Serene wrote:Dude just because I said some naughty words doesn't mean I'm raging
Go do you a meta dive and then come back after you know where the bar is set
-k
I don't give a fuck who you are, if the answer to my question is "yes" then I'm putting a bullet in you. My tolerance for assholes is zero after the last couple of games I'd had to deal with.In post 242, Most Serene wrote:In post 239, Carl Tuckerson wrote:Are you gonna be like this all game? Your answer decides if you live to day 2.In post 213, Most Serene wrote:Dude just because I said some naughty words doesn't mean I'm raging
Go do you a meta dive and then come back after you know where the bar is set
-k
It's so cute you think you have any say in how long I live.
Do you know who I am?
In post 245, Carl Tuckerson wrote:I don't give a fuck who you are, if the answer to my question is "yes" then I'm putting a bullet in you. My tolerance for assholes is zero after the last couple of games I'd had to deal with.In post 242, Most Serene wrote:In post 239, Carl Tuckerson wrote:Are you gonna be like this all game? Your answer decides if you live to day 2.In post 213, Most Serene wrote:Dude just because I said some naughty words doesn't mean I'm raging
Go do you a meta dive and then come back after you know where the bar is set
-k
It's so cute you think you have any say in how long I live.
Do you know who I am?