Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:44 am
Gdooooog123456789 failed to respond to his prod in 24 hours and is being replaced.
I think I need to take a break before I break a game rule here. This statement is not cool, regardless of your alignment.In post 208, Chibiie wrote: You lack social skills.
Failure to answer a direct question. Noted.In post 201, Chibiie wrote:Derailing from subject, will ignore, but not forget.In post 198, Formerfish wrote:See the problem with poking bears is that sometimes sleeping ones dont give a fuck who they swat.
This backfires lolIn post 227, Formerfish wrote:Failure to answer a direct question. Noted.In post 201, Chibiie wrote:Derailing from subject, will ignore, but not forget.In post 198, Formerfish wrote:See the problem with poking bears is that sometimes sleeping ones dont give a fuck who they swat.
VOTE: Chibs
Disingenuous scum can get rope, and i can go back to sleep now.
Didn't mean to make it sound rude.In post 226, Farren wrote:I think I need to take a break before I break a game rule here. This statement is not cool, regardless of your alignment.In post 208, Chibiie wrote: You lack social skills.
I apologize for my casting of shame on you. That was uncalled for.
Here's your answer, btw:In post 227, Formerfish wrote:Failure to answer a direct question. Noted.In post 201, Chibiie wrote:Derailing from subject, will ignore, but not forget.In post 198, Formerfish wrote:See the problem with poking bears is that sometimes sleeping ones dont give a fuck who they swat.
VOTE: Chibs
Disingenuous scum can get rope, and i can go back to sleep now.
Yes, I was talking about you two, I've pretty much wrote you names in the same post :/In post 211, Chibiie wrote:This is what I call a "bruh" moment.In post 209, Farren wrote:Post 27.- RQS
Posts 28- Interaction with ETL, not FF/ 32 - 34.- Indirect, objective view
Post 56 / 59 / 73 / 75.- Indirect, objective view
yeah they didn't. playing on mobile sucks.In post 195, Chibiie wrote:They've never voted each other...In post 187, faüstiv wrote:His reads on Farren/Former echo mine. I think there’s definitely one scum in there. As I said I can’t see them both being scum at this stage due to Farren’s vote on Fish. I don’t think scum places a vote on the partner that early on in the game.
Never really interacted with each other...
Isolate their posts, you'll notice no direct, nor semi-direct interaction between them.
Disagree. Attacking a player is out of bounds, attack a role is not.In post 229, Chibiie wrote:It is the nature of the game.
You said we had no contact, direct or indirect, then list times where we had both. Gotcha, also ive been sick all weekend and have been playing on a limited basis. So yeah, in the last few pages you are correct, but you would be correct if you looked at any slot, not just the on you picked to harp on for your agenda to move forward.In post 230, Chibiie wrote:Here's your answer, btw:In post 227, Formerfish wrote:Failure to answer a direct question. Noted.In post 201, Chibiie wrote:Derailing from subject, will ignore, but not forget.In post 198, Formerfish wrote:See the problem with poking bears is that sometimes sleeping ones dont give a fuck who they swat.
VOTE: Chibs
Disingenuous scum can get rope, and i can go back to sleep now.Yes, I was talking about you two, I've pretty much wrote you names in the same post :/In post 211, Chibiie wrote:This is what I call a "bruh" moment.In post 209, Farren wrote:Post 27.- RQS
Posts 28- Interaction with ETL, not FF/ 32 - 34.- Indirect, objective view
Post 56 / 59 / 73 / 75.- Indirect, objective view
Gotta go, be back in a few hours.
Direct / semi-direct.In post 195, Chibiie wrote:Isolate their posts, you'll notice no direct, nor semi-direct interaction between them.
In #148 I've said:In post 148, Chibiie wrote:In post 144, Farren wrote:I absolutely can and will question why you are answering questions that are specifically addressed to someone else before the person they are addressed to answers them. It interferes with my ability to read them. It makes it difficult to judge if their answers are genuine or contrived.In post 142, Chibiie wrote:You can question my posts, however, you cannot question why I answer others questions.
If I post something and then you interfere and start elaborating on that subject, or merely post a comment on one of my posts in order to receive reactions from others, that's what we all refer to as "game progression".
You questioning my point of view as in something I shouldn't do in a game where I have absolute no info on who's alignments are, is indeed pretty fishy. You intend to say I'm wrong for making that statement? Are you trying to stall the game or you do not appreciate me taking defense of a player that I like and also happens to be cornered and pressured by two other players from different angles?
Keep in mind this is not a full-on defense with certainty that @faüstiv is 100% townread, but I do like his approach to the game and his playstyle in these early stage of D1.
It interferes with your ability to read them, however, it opens the door for a new read. (me and anyone else reacting on this)
You tend to ignore this stuff, which Townies tend to focus on actually.
What you're trying to say is that you tunnel-vision on each player individually?
Scums play behind your back then, I don't know...
Are you trying to imply that answering questions on behalf of other people gives you an insight into their alignment? If not, why are you trying to connect those two things together? If so, how?
I creates reactions, people will either agree or disagree with me. It gives the originally asked person a perspective on me and depending on alignment and playstyle, will follow-up with cooperation / doubt.
So to answer your question, yes. It does giveMEan insight into their alignment.
Answered all three questions at once :)
Actively trying to interfere with someone's ability to read another benefits scum. Whether or not your statement was flat-out wrong - who knows? Maybe you did answer the question exactly how faustiv would have. But we'll never know for sure now, and that's the problem with it.
I disagree. Actively trying to interfere with someone's ability to read another will throw scum off. I give them stuff to think about, I challenge them with my posts.
Very, very good scums would derail from my original statements and will do it flawlessly, so I cannot tell if they're scum or townies, literally throw me off... That requires some social deceiving skills and I believe Yoda can agree with me when I say that I am a pretty socially skilled.
Regarding if my statement was flat-out wrong or not, that's not me who decides. I have no control over peeps point of view. They may scumread me or they may raise me as the biggest townread.
My intent was not to answer like faüstiv would have, but to prove faüstiv that I understand his plays. It was an answer for a question addressed to faüstiv, however, my audience for that reply was faüstiv himself.
Townies won't lie.@faüstivwill point out anything that I did wrong.
I mean, if I wasthatwrong, faüstiv will not accept my defense, but will rather question it, right?
I am not trying to stall the game. I have no issues with your attempting to defend faustiv;I do have issues with how you're going about it.
Is my style... Pretty complex, ain't it?PEDIT:You're on to something, I admit that you're pretty smart if I'm right.[#147]
I've been doing this since the beginning of the game and my audience is different for different posts.Regarding if my statement was flat-out wrong or not, that's not me who decides. I have no control over peeps point of view. They may scumread me or they may raise me as the biggest townread.
My intent was not to answer like faüstiv would have, but to prove faüstiv that I understand his plays. It was an answer for a question addressed to faüstiv, however, my audience for that reply was faüstiv himself.
agreedIn post 237, Chibiie wrote:I messed up...
Note to self: Don't play this game on phone.
Only wanted to cut a portion.
OMG ty for coming here.In post 242, Radja wrote:Made it to page 8 but taking a break.
Notes:
ETL jumps on GildedSun for being nervous in RVS. Seems like a bad way to sort a newbie. Leaning scum
GildedSun's defense looks genuine. Leaning town
ETL backs off from initial push on on Gildedsun. Moving up to null
Formerfish questions ETL for initial push. Good call. Also questions the sheeping from Spartan, which is also good.
Formerfish's reaction to ETL backing off feels bad. Regardless of ETL's actual motivation, pushing Gildedsun for a reaction isn't really a bad play this early in the game.
ETL's pushback on Formerfish looks good. Unsure about ETL voting Spartan over Fish though.
ETL pushes Fish more and follows up with a vote finally. 1 on 1 seems a bit over the top. Lean town for now
faustiv acts like he's in the game but doesn't want to share thoughts. Trying to look busy maybe?
Farren questions his scumread Spartan.
YodaVader makes a good entrance, Chibiie opens with an L-1 vote. Yikes
ETL attempts to derail the Fish wagon
Chibiie mentions not having fully read the game, but still put Fish at L-1 in his opening. Weird
faustiv analysis of the game is good. Lean town
Farren pushes faustiv for questioning the Spartan voters. Seems like a bit too defensive.
Chibiie puts Gdog at L-1 now. Feels a bit opportunistic.
Chibiie pushes Fish/Farren. If this is scum he's definitely swinging hard. Leaning town
Chibiie looks town for his approach against Farren. I'm not sure yet what to think of Farren. More convinced on Chibiie town than Farren scum
Town leans: GildedSun, ETL, faustiv, Chibiie
That leaves 2 scum in FormerFish, Farren, Gdog and Yoda. I'll hold off on voting until I'm fully caught up.
UNVOTE: