Mafiascum.net

rb you should calm down a bit, honestly you are keeping scum from posting

In post 202, alimdia wrote:I'm inclined to think that invis vs jake is actually SvS. That's pretty rare I must say, but it seems like some light bussing gone wrong.

thats a disgusting read and goes against your whole slip thought process and basically whatever you are doing rn still vote there

still voting there*

In post 222, rb wrote:as it stands, i think invis' scum slip is worth lynching

Then please move your vote back to invis and lets get this wagon going.

I'm actually TRing rb's reaction to my joke claim. Of course my ego wants to OMGUS vote rb but it won't help anything.

Rb's thinks I'm scum and that's fine for now, I don't think he will sr me for long.
---------------------

THe invis wagon is the way to go now. At least we have to get a few more vote for pressure to see what happens but it's the best start for D1 as things stand now.

VOTE: ark selflessly promoting a counter wagon

I think dolly towntold with her rxn to wake's refusal to accept the claim offer. She even bringed the fact that she gained an obv town read out of it again a page or so after, which means she most likely said the truth

I think the inv slip thing is ridiculous, i am also an avid slip reader and if anything, sausa much more likely slipd than inv ever did this game since town has no reasons whatsoever to think about counter-claims D1 in a closed setup, its not an available thought to town. And guess what, still too weak of a slip for me to lynch solely on

So my read right now are:

Town:
Wake
rb

Scum:
invis


The rest will be sorted as we progress.

In post 231, Dolly Parton wrote:So my read right now are:

Town:
Wake
rb

Scum:
invis


The rest will be sorted as we progress.

That changed quickly.

FTR

I have been doing light poe d1 for years now with pretty good accuracy and boy, does Ark fills that role in this game.

4 posts ✔
Self-conscious ✔
Nothing game related ✔
Awkward RVS banter ✔
Weak slot but no one mentions them ✔

In post 224, Joey_ wrote:Also, boy your scum games must suffer because you are playing like an open book

you'd be surprised at the range of my play

In post 234, rb wrote:

In post 224, Joey_ wrote:Also, boy your scum games must suffer because you are playing like an open book

you'd be surprised at the range of my play

only two games i saw you were pretty obvious

I mean, in comparison to whatever you are doing this game

but also, i don't have much fun playing as scum so i don't sandbag as town so that i can be better at the alignment i've never once enjoyed playing

on the rare occasion i apply effort to a scum game, i tend to do fine

and no i don't have any recollection of you as a player joey so i don't think we've played together recently

In post 239, rb wrote:and no i don't have any recollection of you as a player joey so i don't think we've played together recently

I was refering to

In post 154, rb wrote:the only reliable read on joey is that he's capable of identifying things that aren't logically consistent

this isn't an alignment tell, it's a player tell

if you're analytical, you're analytical and you can ask pertinent questions and be brazen about it as either alignment

It was weird because It's something i have been told in my last 2 games on site, i assumed you used an alt and was there

Also i never meant to diss your competence as a scum player, i think you are def above average and you saved my ass at least once in the past

just based on how you play in this game

point was that i can't see a reason to strong townread you for your play because it's just standard analytical player stuff, alignment notwithstanding

kcdaspot has a bunch of posts and yet none of them are very meaningful

possible partner with invis if invis flips red

VOTE: invis

back 2 this

In post 195, Wake1 wrote:Dolly, rb, Alimdia, do you also feel that Jake's post comes off as Try-Hard Scum?

126

Also, let's not quicklynch Invisible, thanks. Or Dolly Python.

.

.

.

.

.