Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:05 am
? Huh, why these and uncrowned vote for faustiv? I’d rather the pressure be kept on thomth at this stage
? Huh, why these and uncrowned vote for faustiv? I’d rather the pressure be kept on thomth at this stage
So, your thinking was by pushing a vote so close to lynch, it makes it easier to find scum because they’ll have already voted for this person beforehand? That’s your thinking?In post 151, Thomth wrote:Don't see what the fuss is about bringing someone to L-1 on page 2 scums gotta ride the wagon, right?
In post 151, Thomth wrote:Don't see what the fuss is about bringing someone to L-1 on page 2 scums gotta ride the wagon, right?
I don’t like this backtracking from their vote. Like....they tried something and didn’t like where it has got them...In post 153, Thomth wrote:To be honest I don't like my playstyle either it goes agaisnt the nature of this game and is way to unconventional to be fun. The game freaks me out and confuses me. I like the game though.In post 111, Uncrowned wrote:Do you mean Thomth?
I don't really like his playstyle and wouldn't mind him as a policy lynch, tbh. I feel like it's anti-town.
I'm generally of the belief that that sort of thing can wait until D2 though, or at least late into the D1 phase once we've gotten more discussion going.
Yep, like this ReadIn post 192, Creature wrote:"oh we have l-1 already, ill personally move to someone else to avoid involvement"In post 47, Arkias wrote:Also, how on earth do we have the Worst at L-1 already?
Personally though, I want to know more about Uncrowned. His posts so far rub me the wrong way.
VOTE: Uncrowned
yep faustiv is my pick for lynchIn post 227, the worst wrote:Rn I feel like pressuring Thomth is like watering a fish. He's gonna keep playing and if he stops it's gonna be super obvious :U
Faustiv opener earnestly scummy
agreed didn't pick this up at first but this is a good take imoIn post 229, geraintm wrote:Yep, like this ReadIn post 192, Creature wrote:"oh we have l-1 already, ill personally move to someone else to avoid involvement"In post 47, Arkias wrote:Also, how on earth do we have the Worst at L-1 already?
Personally though, I want to know more about Uncrowned. His posts so far rub me the wrong way.
VOTE: Uncrowned
I’m likely messing up the quote there, but I can see a new scum player being as bad as thomth has been. New town player...would they have stuck their head up s9 high.In post 213, NaCl wrote:In post 203, Creature wrote:In post 196, NaCl wrote:Creature, I think you have too many townreads and should re-evaluate.
Regarding Thomth, I don't think he's scum, although I do agree that he's not being very useful. But I don't see why scum would bother doing such random, attention drawing moves as opposed to not doing them. I just don't really see where the scum benefit is in that, unless it's "oh, they'll think it's too dumb to be a scum move". It just feels like he's reckless rather than he's trying to get a lynch. And maybe it's just been my experience, but I don't think I've ever had a quickhammer in a newbie game from something like this.
I’m happy to pile pressure on thomth and see what happens.In post 227, the worst wrote:Rn I feel like pressuring Thomth is like watering a fish. He's gonna keep playing and if he stops it's gonna be super obvious :U
Faustiv opener earnestly scummy
In post 225, geraintm wrote:? Huh, why these and uncrowned vote for faustiv? I’d rather the pressure be kept on thomth at this stage
Quoted wrong post somehow, my reply was directed at this.In post 226, geraintm wrote:So, your thinking was by pushing a vote so close to lynch, it makes it easier to find scum because they’ll have already voted for this person beforehand? That’s your thinking?In post 151, Thomth wrote:Don't see what the fuss is about bringing someone to L-1 on page 2 scums gotta ride the wagon, right?
I disagree ldOG has contributed and I would say he has contributed more then you have. I think what you are actually saying though is that you are not getting anything out of his posts which is fair.In post 206, Arkias wrote:So, to finally answer that question that was posed earlier.
My opinion of Loserdude so far is that he really hasn't... dome much? Reading his posts in ISO just make it seem a lot like he's typed, but really hasn't contributed much. I don't have much of a read on him, NACL, since he's pretty forgettable and head down.
Tomth is the weirder one of the two, for sure.
I was just tossing you under the bus moron.In post 181, LoserdudeOG wrote:The OMGUS is real y’all. One down one to goIn post 161, Thomth wrote:VOTE: LoserdudeOGIn post 155, LoserdudeOG wrote:Thomth you should tell me who your scumbuddy is
I like this.In post 144, faüstiv wrote:maybe I have read the game and my vote is a reflection of that.In post 143, Uncrowned wrote:I think him coming in late would've been fine if he read the game and had input to give.
Coming in, naked voting and providing nothing more has definitely gotten my attention.
Why is he threatening your scum buddy?In post 173, Creature wrote:In post 128, faüstiv wrote:conFIRMfaüstiv has 0 days, 7 hours, 59 minutes to confirm or be replaced.In post 130, faüstiv wrote:what's the crackThis amounts to absolutely nothing and feels like Faustive is forcing an aggressive playstyle he obviously can't keep up.In post 144, faüstiv wrote:maybe I have read the game and my vote is a reflection of that.In post 143, Uncrowned wrote:I think him coming in late would've been fine if he read the game and had input to give.
Coming in, naked voting and providing nothing more has definitely gotten my attention.
Questioning and poking people is a good way to create content to develope reads. Which is what I think Uncrowned wants to do.In post 87, Arkias wrote:Yeah, sure!In post 54, the worst wrote:Could you give me a quick rundown of why pleaseIn post 47, Arkias wrote:Personally though, I want to know more about Uncrowned. His posts so far rub me the wrong way.
18, 20, 22 really just... rub me strangely. I know overall it's fairly innocent with the conversation about the butter/sweet spot of when to vote (voting in the middle makes you stand out more or less). I can't exactly say why I don't like it, it's just a feeling at the moment. If you go through his post history, he's questioned and poked people a lot, but hasn't actually given his own tells/reads or anything to say, outside of poking other people for explanations. Like I said, it's just weird to me at the moment, but I don't really have much more than that.
Outside of Uncrowned, I'm really just waiting for a post from faüstiv or whomever replaces them.
I don't really have much to comment on just yet, nor do I see anything worth on the discussion, but I do have some townleans/reads. Are those worth speaking about as much as things that rub you the wrong way?
Also, Hi creature!
Votes arent random when pushing someone to lynch minus one.In post 236, Thomth wrote:In post 225, geraintm wrote:? Huh, why these and uncrowned vote for faustiv? I’d rather the pressure be kept on thomth at this stage
To be honest, I literally just wanted to throw a RVS vote on the worst and I did not want the fact that my vote would bring them to L-1 to stop me from doing that.