Mafiascum.net

I think Tanner has shown the ability to actually READ my posts and tried to understand my intentions.
Not sure if he's someone who has actually played with me before and therefore understands my wonky ways, or if he's just an observative player.

Anyhow, I think Tanners earlier posts where they used such tone-related words as "relaxed" and "interested" really pinged me.
They then got stuck on my very first RvS-post that had absolutely no deeper meaning to it.
Then the very hasty feel I got from their posts regarding the Drew-lynch didn't fit my read on them, ESPECIALLY since they backed down from that vote rather quickly.
I feel like they faked a concede on the matter, just to be able to unvote.
TBH, I really like a theory where both Drew and Tanner are scum.

Drew is 50/50 because of the claim, but I think Tanner is scum unrelated to Drew. (just pointing this out right away before someone jumps on me for not voting Drew. )

In post 221, Tanner wrote:Sorry to hear that, Una. Do you wanna talk about it?

I believe it started when I was born as a second child to a family that would later be split and reforged into a family that would come to have as many as 7 children.
The need for attention always.......

Sorry, I had to.

In post 223, Tanner wrote:Luca is always V/LA on weekends. That kinda push is disingenuous at best, downright insulting at worst.

How the fuck would I know that?

Far out...

You can call me observative.

Yes, they were early posts. Tone is generally what I go for early.
Your very first post called Prada scum right after Prada did things that could be analysed as AI. I thought you actually saw something.
What does "that didn't fit your read on me" mean?

Also, how is Drew just 50/50?

pedit: is that true? I'm an only child, I can't imagine that honestly.

In post 228, Drew-Sta wrote:

In post 223, Tanner wrote:Luca is always V/LA on weekends. That kinda push is disingenuous at best, downright insulting at worst.

How the fuck would I know that?

Far out...

Maybe by the fact he put up V/LA tags? And announced it in-thread?

You suggesting he does it always on weekends is what I mean.

Also Una buddying me is win win. He knows I’m not scum, and knows when I flip town he can claim he wasn’t part of the lynch.

Sure, you couldn't know that part. But accusing him of avoiding the issue when it was clear that he's V/LA is still Not A Good Look.

To be clear, I don't think you're scum for it, and Luca could be scum regardless, it just annoys me to no end when people make accusations like that.

In post 150, GeorgeBailey wrote:I still think that if there's a vig, he should definitely be the target tonight.

First, he's not going to be there tonight. A 2-miller setup is very unlikely, making him very likely to be scum.

Second, we don't even know that we have a vig.

Third, a vig should never shoot someone who's easily lynchable anyway.

In post 153, Drew-Sta wrote:You can lynch me today if you need. I’m happy to be a martyr if you can’t settle on another townie.

So you're that sure we couldn't lynch scum?

Not a serious question. Now that the lynch is AFAIC settled, everything from scum is wifom. But I thought the way he phrased that was interesting.

In post 159, Drew-Sta wrote:I guess why I’m saying that is it is possible he’s also lying.

Look, I’m going to die. That’s fine. But at least consider the possibility of two millers.

If he were "also lying," that would mean zero millers, not two.

In post 202, Riabi wrote:Why don't you stop trying to summarize what I'm saying and let me speak for myself?

Yeah, that's what I was thinking reading that exchange. Drew's the one doing the gaslighting.

In post 203, Not Known 15 wrote:Drew-Sta (3)Persivul;mavsfan41;Knightmare491;

Drew is highly likely to be scum. He's highly likely to be the lynch. That means that everything coming from scum at this point is WIFOM. In my experience, that hurts town more than helps. We need more votes here.

In post 204, Riabi wrote:@Mod Thank you.

VOTE: Drew

I endorse this product or service.

In post 210, Drew-Sta wrote:When I show up as town, what will be your first response in the game eg what will you look to do?

Scum claim.

IMO we should proceed as follows:

- Lynch Drew sooner rather than later.
- If there is a vig, don't shoot tonight. N1 vig shots are always bad. If you feel you must, shoot a lurker slot that we won't be able to read anyway.

In post 232, Drew-Sta wrote:Also Una buddying me is win win. He knows I’m not scum, and knows when I flip town he can claim he wasn’t part of the lynch.

This isn't the first time this has been brought up lately.
And this isn't the first time I'm going to say this - you will not ever see me expecting any towncredit for regocnizing a mislynch before it happens.
I do not believe in "towncredit" in that sense.

Furthermore - nowhere have I stated that I do not think you are not scum!
I'm fine with you being the lynch, no problemo.
I just don't feel like we need to be hasty about it at all.

You have already missed my very blatant reaction tests and made certain no town-benefit would ever come from them anyway, so I don't assume you'd understand my PoV anyway.

In post 229, Tanner wrote:Prada

I am not a handbag.

In post 241, Persivul wrote:- Lynch Drew sooner rather than later.

What? No.

More discussion is always good. The only time that is not the case is in a mylo situation where we want to no lynch, where the less information given to the scum is good.

Right now, we gain extra info to use tomorrow regardless of who dies tonight. Rushing the lynch through is a terrible idea. I'm 100% behind a Drew lynch (for my reasoning, see basically everything said up to this point), I'm just not up for doing it right now. I'll happily hammer when the time comes though.

In post 172, Saladman27 wrote:As of now, my read for scumteam is una, george and drew. I'm sus of drew for obv reasons. I'm sus of george because of his spectacularly shitty defense for drew. Una is sus for defending george by pushing tanner. I think either Una or Drew were the bus target because of the quotes in 166.
Does anyone have the vote count on drew?

This needs to die. ^

In post 213, Tanner wrote:I saw another person accuse Una of "double speaking", and like... are you people intentionally playing dumb?

No the kid is weird. He ask about voting, then says there is no hurry. The only glimmer is that he was interested in seeing very little votes on Drew.

In post 216, Knightmare491 wrote:You can probably say that about 4 other people in this game. My timezone is GMT +5.30 so I wasn't there for most of the RVS. Drew's claim was the first real point of interest in the game, it had already been explored and he was questioned by other so there was no point beating a dead horse.

Who are you currently scum reading?

In post 244, farside wrote:No the kid is weird.

I do not get offended easily, but it's still kind of funny when someone calls me a "kid".

@farside

In post 219, Tanner wrote:...am ...am I seriously the only person here that knows what a reaction test is? After it has been laid out as such?7

Una, I've responded in 229. You don't want to talk?

In post 234, Persivul wrote:

In post 150, GeorgeBailey wrote:I still think that if there's a vig, he should definitely be the target tonight.

First, he's not going to be there tonight. A 2-miller setup is very unlikely, making him very likely to be scum.

Second, we don't even know that we have a vig.

Third, a vig should never shoot someone who's easily lynchable anyway.

I disagree with 3 completely. If players aren't sure and a player claims miller a vig shot on that player is the best thing for the town.

In post 238, Persivul wrote:

In post 203, Not Known 15 wrote:Drew-Sta (3)Persivul;mavsfan41;Knightmare491;

Drew is highly likely to be scum. He's highly likely to be the lynch. That means that everything coming from scum at this point is WIFOM. In my experience, that hurts town more than helps. We need more votes here.

You are scum!!!!
You are lucky I wanted to play with you this game, but man there is no way I find anything on this page town coming from you.

On a completely unrelated note, Unabomb in no longer on the top of my scum list.
Salad, Persivul and Knight.

Still waiting for a few people to post more before finalizing my list.

In post 246, Tanner wrote:@farside

In post 219, Tanner wrote:...am ...am I seriously the only person here that knows what a reaction test is? After it has been laid out as such?7

It was a poor attempt at one if it was a reaction test.

In post 245, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 244, farside wrote:No the kid is weird.

I do not get offended easily, but it's still kind of funny when someone calls me a "kid".

Sorry I got the term from my co-worker. He tends to be older then everyone and he calls me kid. I just get the impression from your post that you are much younger then I am.