Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 4:28 am
What are your reads on Billy, Mr. Stral?
Anything standing out to you right now?
Anything standing out to you right now?
I agree 100%. I was thinking this about Norfolk, but wanted to give him time, which he hasn’t done.In post 217, Dunnstral wrote:My justification is that you are giving analysis but it doesn't to anything. You are going with the flow and keeping up with the conversation,
It's deflectionIn post 224, Facebones wrote:What is your reaction to this?In post 218, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:Excellent read there, but also one that could easily be attributed to yourself, mini, bakslash and maybe padwag.
Well as I said I’ve played with her two times as town and she is playing similar to the way she was then. The fact that she challenged me for my RQS questioning shows she’s not worried about ruffling feathers, which I believe she knows wouldn’t be good if she was scum, given that I can tunnel hard.In post 184, Rockhopper wrote:Can you talk more about this?In post 171, ItalianoVD wrote:I played with Mini twice I believe and she was townie both times. I haven’t really seen her scum game before so I wouldn’t know what to look for, but as of now I’m townreading her.In post 165, padwag wrote:Italiano, what do you think of minimegabyte? (If you have no opinion on them that's fine)
What do you find towny about her so far?
Agreed.In post 183, Rockhopper wrote:There's a really good chance that scum exists outside of {bakslash, padwag}.
*snickers*In post 220, Dunnstral wrote:When did I ever "jump on the defensive"?
I was looking for reactions from bakslash, particularly something overly defensive, which would signal scum.In post 200, Billy Pilgrim wrote:You said you did that for reactions. What AI type of reactions did you think you were likely to get and from whom?In post 139, padwag wrote:Honestly, I said it was a reaction test because I didn't want to leave bakslash hanging.In post 135, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Forgot to respond to the middle question.In post 111, ItalianoVD wrote:Okay? Not sure why you don’t understand. I was asking if these votes were RVS votes or serious ones? I assumed your bakslash one was based on the wording, but I just wanted to make sure. My bad if I didn’t make it clear.In post 86, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I dont understand the question. I dont approach these games as though there's some magical point where the game shifts from RVS to serious. Theres a wiki thread I think that talks about the early game as the Low Information stage. I like to think of it that way.
How was it weird? Isn’t that what RVS’ purpose is? Reactions?In post 86, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I started with my role and alignment, and I voted randomly. When I made those votes, I had a page of content and most folks had popped into the thread. So I picked the opening that I felt was the most scummy and voted it. I thought padwag's vote was fine,but the answer to the question was weird.
That’s all fine. Thank you.In post 86, Billy Pilgrim wrote:But then I realized that bakslash hadnt posted already. Their first post in the game was literally to quote padwag's naked vote and put a question mark. Didn't engage with any of the content that was there, just put a weird question out.
Two times people in this game have done something that they claim was a reaction test then within five posts, have explained that it was a reaction test. I dont believe either of them. By the way, this is why I voted padwag. Not because he did an rvs vote, but because he claimed he was doing a reaction test where he got the most predictable reaction, and then before he could see if anyone else.would react to it, he admitted it was a reaction test. Like that's looking busy to look busy.
Then rockhopper votes bakslash, "to see how he would respond" and doesn't even give bakslash a chance to respond before saying thats why he put him there. Honestly both those moves look like searching for town cred.
Honestly, I feel this isn't how townblocks are supposed to work. A townblock is an agreement that forms gradually between two players, without a formal request, where they will townread each other and defend each other through anything. This feels more like buddying to me.In post 185, Rockhopper wrote:Wanna form a townblock?In post 152, Facebones wrote:I'm getting more townie feels from rockhopper currently
I’m not sure what you want me to say or do.In post 232, Facebones wrote:Did you miss 219?
Hello? Earth to Italiano? I'M NOT INVISIBLE, BRO
That's twice now, man. Have you not been paying attention?!
This is one method I use to get reads from people. Sometimes, they bring up points that I didn't even think of, and it can generate productive conversations as well.In post 208, MiniMegabyte wrote:Spoiler:
I have a question based on these posts.
Why do you feel the need to ask what players think of others?
I want you to realise that one of the three players who had a vote on old mate Norfolk took their vote off him and placed it on someone elseIn post 236, ItalianoVD wrote:I’m not sure what you want me to say or do.
In post 209, Micc wrote:
Dunnstral made it E-2. I obviously missed something o why don’t you make it clear for me to understand. You’re comments are very vague and I don’t follow.
Who?In post 238, Facebones wrote:I want you to realise that one of the three players who had a vote on old mate Norfolk took their vote off him and placed it on someone elseIn post 236, ItalianoVD wrote:I’m not sure what you want me to say or do.
I don’t partner hunt, but you can tellIn post 239, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:Rocky, Dunnstral and Italiano - if i'm scum, who is my scumbuddy?
Don't be weak. See it through - name a name.In post 244, ItalianoVD wrote:I don’t partner hunt, but you can tellIn post 239, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:Rocky, Dunnstral and Italiano - if i'm scum, who is my scumbuddy?us.
In post 219, Facebones wrote:Vote: Dunnstral
Town don't dodge questions and if you're town, you need to find 2 scum.In post 246, ItalianoVD wrote:It’s not weak. I don’t partner hunt.