Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:39 pm**

In post 219, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 213, petapan wrote:busywork question
how is that a busywork question

tries to create the appearance of solving but felt pointless and arbitrary

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:39 pm**

In post 224, Infinity 324 wrote:I also feel like peta is being a bit more antagonistic than scum usually are this early.

From my limited experience of peta I doubt that level of antagonism would be out of scum-peta's range.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:40 pm**

also lmao at people asking something_smart to "vote" or if he "has reads". he exists on a different plane from us mere mortals

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:40 pm**

Because from what he said, it looked like he thought there wasn't enough readable content to make a vote and his reads were limited at the time.

Asking someone for theirs when they haven't done a lot themselves is a bit weird. In a vacuum I don't believe it's all that AI but given the context from before it pinged me a little

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:40 pm**

In post 225, petapan wrote:tries to create the appearance of solving but felt pointless and arbitrary

It's not pointless? The point is to learn if I have any reads.

And it's not arbitrary, because he noted that I'd participated but hadn't shared any reads yet.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:40 pm**

In post 226, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 224, Infinity 324 wrote:I also feel like peta is being a bit more antagonistic than scum usually are this early.
From my limited experience of peta I doubt that level of antagonism would be out of scum-peta's range.

i will tell you this is correct before hoopla does (i am town this game tho)

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:42 pm**

In post 229, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 225, petapan wrote:tries to create the appearance of solving but felt pointless and arbitrary
It's not pointless? The point is to learn if I have any reads.

And it's not arbitrary, because he noted that I'd participated but hadn't shared any reads yet.

eh it's a level 1 scumbo move to go "hey x do you have any reads"

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:44 pm**

In post 227, petapan wrote:also lmao at people asking something_smart to "vote" or if he "has reads". he exists on a different plane from us mere mortals

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:44 pm**

s_s, do you think it's important that people don't develop reads for bad reasons? (Don't remember that much about how you tend to play)

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:46 pm**

I'm confident enough in PP for now

UNVOTE: PenguinPower

VOTE: Lilith

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:48 pm**

vote count 1.05

lilith2013 (4)

: davesaz, PenguinPower, skitter30, Uncrowned

Uncrowned (2)

: JacksonVirgo, DrippingGoofball

PenguinPower (1)

: Hoopla

JacksonVirgo (1)

: lilith2013

Infinity 324 (1)

: petapan

Not voting

: Something_Smart, Dunnstral, Pine, TheGoldenParadox, Infinity 324

Deadline: (expired on 2020-11-02 21:15:00)

mod notes

:
- skitter30 v/la Fridays & Saturdays
- quack

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:50 pm**

Bray

what kind of noise is

that

for a bird to make?
- tw

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:54 pm**

rats.

looks like i hitched my wagon to the wrong horse.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: lilith

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:56 pm**

In post 236, PenguinPower wrote:Bray

what kind of noise is
that
for a bird to make?
- tw

I see you have discovered sneak edit powers. Good on you, duck.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:56 pm**

In post 231, petapan wrote:eh it's a level 1 scumbo move to go "hey x do you have any reads"

sure but it's also a level 1 town move?

like it's a pretty normal thing from both alignments.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:57 pm**

In post 237, Hoopla wrote:rats.

looks like i hitched my wagon to the wrong horse.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: lilith

I like this vote the least so far.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:59 pm**

In post 233, Infinity 324 wrote:s_s, do you think it's important that people don't develop reads for bad reasons? (Don't remember that much about how you tend to play)

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:00 pm**

Sorry, missed that.

Yes, extremely.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:00 pm**

I would rather have no reads than have reads based on bad reasons.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:07 pm**

i have never read anyone for a good reason and i never will

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:09 pm**

In post 243, Something_Smart wrote:I would rather have no reads than have reads based on bad reasons.

Booo

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:19 pm**

You'd think that would be an uncontroversial take.

And yet.

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:21 pm**

I mean it is for you. But it’s still boooo

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:29 pm**

ugh it's so close...

Posted: **Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:29 pm**

quack

Mafiascum.net

Open 798 | PYPX/Y+I/M | Game Over!