Page 10 of 78
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:53 am
by Esooa
In post 221, Andresvmb wrote: In post 219, Esooa wrote:hey koba how did you feel when you say your pm told you you were scum this game? pls answer it's important
You’re not helping the game state.
I was answering kobas "how is questioning bad" with this
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:58 am
by bugspray
not really, i think this speaks for itself
In post 210, Esooa wrote:
it's not really my primary concern no
but ok I'm bored now what do you need to ask
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:59 am
by bugspray
weird unvote off of a slot that doesn't even have any pressure
why not figure out a better vote and pivot then? nobody is going to think worse of you to keep yur rvs vote
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:05 am
by Esooa
In post 160, DkKoba wrote:No, you said it was a joke - now you're implying there's some seriousness to it - which is it?
In post 161, Esooa wrote: In post 160, DkKoba wrote:No, you said it was a joke - now you're implying there's some seriousness to it - which is it?
how about the fact there's no seriousness implied anywhere
In post 162, DkKoba wrote:So you're choosing to not directly answer the question - understood.
here's why I stopped answering/engaging koba
they're putting intention that isn't anywhere in my posts and when I say as much they try and imply rejecting a loaded questions premise is scummy
no interest in this
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:11 am
by bugspray
but you literally did imply there was seriousness to it
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:12 am
by Esooa
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:12 am
by bugspray
In post 157, Esooa wrote: In post 156, DkKoba wrote: In post 150, DkKoba wrote:Well esooa why did you include the part about me TRing you, when we only have 2 games together, one where i DID end up with the right read on you in the end mind you.
i just wanna understand your thought process
because I was giving other players a metric by which to read me this game: if you read me as town, other players should assume I'm scum. If you read me as scum, other players should assume I'm town
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:13 am
by bugspray
this post implies there is seriousness to it can just seems contradictory to everything else you've said about it
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:13 am
by Esooa
In post 231, bugspray wrote: In post 157, Esooa wrote: In post 156, DkKoba wrote: In post 150, DkKoba wrote:Well esooa why did you include the part about me TRing you, when we only have 2 games together, one where i DID end up with the right read on you in the end mind you.
i just wanna understand your thought process
because I was giving other players a metric by which to read me this game: if you read me as town, other players should assume I'm scum. If you read me as scum, other players should assume I'm town
there's no way koba reads this and things I'm ACTUALLY wanting people to read me like this
where have I said anyone should?
I am literally answering their question about the content of the joke
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:14 am
by Esooa
"Well esooa why did you include the part about me TRing you"
I am answering why something is in a *joke* post
the content of which, is a joke
I explained, as was asked, the content of it
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:17 am
by bugspray
i never said you said that. i've repeatedly said that you
implied
it and now you're just twisting my words
i really have never seen someone use this kind of more technical phrasing when trying to justify a joke in good faith
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:22 am
by Esooa
In post 235, bugspray wrote:
i never said you said that. i've repeatedly said that you
implied
it and now you're just twisting my words
i really have never seen someone use this kind of more technical phrasing when trying to justify a joke in good faith
the solution to the second part is not demand answers about an nai joke
which btw "being thorough" is a bad excuse because there are other things to ask about
also, Kobas assumption when they read an implication, and someone says no that implication isn't there, should be there's a misunderstanding and not that I am literally trying to gaslight koba by saying the implication wasn't there. Especially over something so minor.
About the first quote. Sure, I wouldn't need to say it exactly. But do you think I ever intended for people to actually read me based on the opposite of what koba reads me as?
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:23 am
by Esooa
by the way I hope you can see why I wanted to say "stop asking people about jokes because this is stupid" four pages ago
considering what the last 4 pages have brought
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:30 am
by bugspray
In post 237, Esooa wrote:by the way I hope you can see why I wanted to say "stop asking people about jokes because this is stupid" four pages ago
considering what the last 4 pages have brought
only you can prevent forest fires
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:31 am
by bugspray
In post 236, Esooa wrote:also, Kobas assumption when they read an implication, and someone says no that implication isn't there, should be there's a misunderstanding and not that I am literally trying to gaslight koba by saying the implication wasn't there. Especially over something so minor.
so after i point out you twisting my words (specifically wrt the word imply) you then just write this thing about gaslighting?
like is this deadass?
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:33 am
by Esooa
In post 239, bugspray wrote: In post 236, Esooa wrote:also, Kobas assumption when they read an implication, and someone says no that implication isn't there, should be there's a misunderstanding and not that I am literally trying to gaslight koba by saying the implication wasn't there. Especially over something so minor.
so after i point out you twisting my words (specifically wrt the word imply) you then just write this thing about gaslighting?
like is this deadass?
yes because my response was to say, okay, I know that I wouldn't need to have actually literally said it
like, y'know, agreeing that maybe the specific thing I said there was off base
as is normal
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:37 am
by DkKoba
too lazy to ms paint this but you get the general idea
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:39 am
by Esooa
I like how you post this when I'm trying to actually explain to bugspray what I say
this is why I tell you to fuck off instead of explaining to you
I'll explain to bugspray though
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:42 am
by bugspray
In post 242, Esooa wrote:this is why I tell you to fuck off instead of explaining to you
I'll explain to bugspray though
divide and conquer
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:43 am
by DkKoba
esooa ur doing a bad job in convincing me ur not just playing towards a scum wincon here.
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:44 am
by Esooa
In post 244, DkKoba wrote:esooa ur doing a bad job in convincing me ur not just playing towards a scum wincon here.
you're the last person I want to convince cause you're way too dense irt any of it so yeah
I don't really care?
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:46 am
by DkKoba
u should know as a video mafia player that stupid small stuff like that can be subconscious slips. That's why I wanted to just see your reaction to being pressured on explaining it.
no one is saying "zomg ur scum"
people are saying "please explain your thought process here"
or "take a stance here"
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:47 am
by DkKoba
In post 245, Esooa wrote: In post 244, DkKoba wrote:esooa ur doing a bad job in convincing me ur not just playing towards a scum wincon here.
you're the last person I want to convince cause you're way too dense irt any of it so yeah
I don't really care?
are u fucking kidding me? lmfao
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:47 am
by DkKoba
u literally don't know how to read people who push on you esooa. stand down.
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:49 am
by Esooa
In post 248, DkKoba wrote:u literally don't know how to read people who push on you esooa. stand down.
I'm not trying to read you I'm telling you answering your questions gets about as far as not answering them