Page 10 of 22

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:24 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 220, Gypyx wrote:
T3 has been eliminated !

he was a...
Spoiler:
Mafia Goon


Night 1 starts now and ends in (expired on 2021-05-31 02:02:08)
Seeing the green on T3's flip post made my heart skip a beat on first glance.

Mod is playing with my emotions.

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:27 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 221, Gypyx wrote:
Night 1 has ended !

Roden has died ! He was...


Spoiler:
Vanilla Townie


Day 2 starts now
This is an confusing NK imo.

Like, I was making a case for Roden to be T3's partner, and I am widely TR (I think) so I feel like they easily could have left him alive. So I guess they were PR hunting?

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:29 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 212, Roden wrote:Scum has to go after potential Masons even if it's just bait. Most likely Mix over Xlos since Mix scum read me.
But if there were PR hunting, why did they not target Xlos/Mix?

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:32 pm
by Lukewarm
I can see the argument for Xlos as the scum partner here. If he were the scum, then he would know 100% that the "mason slip" was not real, and would not need to pr hunt in this pair.

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:35 pm
by Lukewarm
I have two possible targets in mind, but want to hear more from other people before I state my number 1 choice for the day. I want to hear everyone's thoughts without anyone tries to just sheep me for the day.

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:47 pm
by Wayward Son
I personally think Bulge, Mix, and Luke are above suspicion.

Not so sure on Egix anymore. if not him, then Roden.

I never made my Hero Solve Yesterday, but I'd almost bet it's one of them.

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:48 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 230, Wayward Son wrote:I personally think Bulge, Mix, and Luke are above suspicion.

Not so sure on Egix anymore. if not him, then Roden.

I never made my Hero Solve Yesterday, but I'd almost bet it's one of them.
Well Roden was killed by the Mafia, so I don't think we need to worry about him lol

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:52 pm
by Wayward Son
Oh. Slinks away. :oops:

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:54 pm
by Lukewarm
In post 232, Wayward Son wrote:Oh. Slinks away. :oops:
You have me, bulge, and mix all in the "above suspicion tier" - Egix as your solve.

Thoughts on Xlos and Zyla?

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:58 pm
by Wayward Son
My next best guess would be Xlos, but I'd have to get it (my scum read) together tomorrow. It's been a long and hard holiday.

Pedit Xlos is sus, I'll explain tomorrow.

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:59 pm
by Wayward Son
Zyla would have to be town, if I'm right.

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 9:28 pm
by Wayward Son
Egix's ISo isn't long and doesn't say much, but I'm not getting any scum vibes from it.

Opinions?

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 10:16 pm
by Wayward Son
In post 50, Xlos wrote:Random is a lame reason to vote for someone IMO. It doesn't really encourage any discussion or have inspire any fear of being lynched. Even the first post of the thread had a reason to vote for someone! So that's my reason to
Even votes with a reason during RVS are random and searching, if your are town.

I'm struggling to make sense of . The connection is "not too convincing", making me think Zyla is town.

Twice in he lightly defends me, maybe a White Knight? A scum who defends a townie.

He never, correct me if I'm wrong, never justifies the vote on bulge. He just goes after T3 from there on out.

He defends T3 a bit with theories of a T3 town. This post feels really defensive.

In he calls me "mafia-esque" and throws some shade at the bulge. Then he town reads Roden.

fluff

He defends Roden and susses me. Asks Mix why I'm not sus.

This is all a WK of Roden and defense of T3.

This is basically a good bye and a note that says "it seems I'm not the only one." that realizes that T3 is going down.

This is my take. I'm willing to be proven wrong.

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 10:42 pm
by Wayward Son
In post 130, Xlos wrote:Note Egix votes T3 later, risking whatever suspicion Roden promises, a bit of a shift. But not surprising he said he did most of the analysis later. Overall Egix has town-like behavior. I like his long post cause it's the kind of post I've made when I was town with nice formatting and stuff (though I guess I've never been non town except for one game when I joke claimed scum in my first post and got lynched for it D1. I wasn't scum either though...)
After the game, I'd like to know if this is true. You've never been scum?

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 10:49 pm
by Wayward Son
In post 157, T3 wrote:Xlos is town and I don't want to say why.
Mixlixwix saying there are more than 2 people I find scummy is towny.
This is also slightly condemning.

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 12:04 am
by Wayward Son
In post 173, Xlos wrote:It's gut reading man... given that I'm not a mason with T3, I can't imagine why the man doesn't want to say why he thinks anything. It's not like he'll be alive D2 to explain, or like we will gain any insight on what he meant by killing him if he does turns out to be town. Maybe he's just tired.
For me this seals it. He tries to paint T3 town in his posts. A lot.

VOTE: Xlos

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:07 am
by Xlos
Wayward Son wrote:
In post 50, Xlos wrote:Random is a lame reason to vote for someone IMO. It doesn't really encourage any discussion or have inspire any fear of being lynched. Even the first post of the thread had a reason to vote for someone! So that's my reason to
Even votes with a reason during RVS are random and searching, if your are town.

I'm struggling to make sense of . The connection is "not too convincing", making me think Zyla is town.
I explained the quoted post in . I don't understand why the second one makes you think Zyla is town, though? Is a light scum lean equal to a town lean?
Wayward Son wrote: He never, correct me if I'm wrong, never justifies the vote on bulge. He just goes after T3 from there on out.
Oh, I voted bulge cause I asked him a question. People are more likely to answer your question if you stick your vote on them.
In post 240, Wayward Son wrote:
In post 173, Xlos wrote:It's gut reading man... given that I'm not a mason with T3, I can't imagine why the man doesn't want to say why he thinks anything. It's not like he'll be alive D2 to explain, or like we will gain any insight on what he meant by killing him if he does turns out to be town. Maybe he's just tired.
For me this seals it. He tries to paint T3 town in his posts. A lot.

VOTE: Xlos
Oh come on, you didn't quote the punchline of this post, I thought it was funny :( Of course the post looks like I think T3 is super town without the punchline.

This post aside, it's true that I wasn't actively going after T3, so I can try to explain my reasoning in more detail. After I read the first two pages of the thread, T3 seemed somewhat suspicious, considering all the points lukewarm make against him and his lackluster responses. But people were digging into his case, and as I don't have that much time to post each day, I figured the others would do a better job of it than me and tried to go for breadth rather than depth, so I tried to look elsewhere for anything that looked fishy. Hence why I was digging into Zyla/Bulge. And as the day progressed, it became more and more obvious that we were just going to kill T3 without any resistance, which is sad. If everyone agrees to kill someone as soon as the thread starts, and then we kill them, it's not really helpful to look back on the next day. Hence why I tried to look at other people, after a certain point, I just considered T3 dead. He was my #1 suspect, too, there just wasn't any point in putting a vote on him. Later in the day, he was just very clearly going to die. If I were mafia, I don't think I would want to be defending someone who was about to flip mafia.

Let's also talk about the last post T3 made that Wayward pointed out:
In post 239, Wayward Son wrote:
In post 157, T3 wrote:Xlos is town and I don't want to say why.
Mixlixwix saying there are more than 2 people I find scummy is towny.
This is also slightly condemning.
How condemning this is, of course, depends on how many levels deep you think T3 is at the time. I think that T3 suspected he was slated to die at this point, so giving positive reads to his scum buddy is a pretty daring move.

That said, I'm not positive if T3 thought he was going to die. Since
In post 182, T3 wrote:I'm vanilla townie. VOTE: egix
wasn't a claim that could draw town power out. Though, he did seem to think that he had already found town power
In post 186, T3 wrote:fwiw Xlos and Zyla slipped as masons. Don't trust any prs claims.
But I personally don't see the slip that me and Zyla supposedly made. And since we weren't killed, does mafia even believe the claim T3 made? One possible reason that Roden was killed was because his agreement with T3 about me and Zyla being masons were seems a pretty town-power move, maybe he was trying to redirect the nightkill to one of us cause he knows we aren't masons. But maybe not, at the bottom of this post I have another possible reason.

I've given a lot (too much) thought to the idea that T3 and Zyla are evil and T3 pinned her with me for some reason, but it just doesn't seem that reasonable. I won't subject you to too much analysis about this for now, though.

I think that Mix is looking very town due to the time he spent constructing a case against Roden. Why try so hard to build a case against a dead man? Unless mafia didn't know who they were going to kill at that time. But still, I really don't see why mafia Mix would kill Roden. I can see Egix killing Roden very easily, though, since Roden was going very hard against him at the end. And nobody else had that much suspicion on Egix besides Roden.

Consider the other choices: Lukewarm who is as close to confirmed town as it gets, and me/Zyla who are suspected to be town power. I think that, to kill someone else, mafia would need to have something big to gain. And the only person who gains from killing Roden (and gains a lot) is Egix.
VOTE: Egix

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:11 am
by Xlos
In post 222, Gypyx wrote:
votecount 2.0
Spoiler:
Image
Unrelated, can someone explain this flavor? Are these just pictures of random rooms?

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:13 am
by Zyla
Uhh, maybe we shouldn't be this quick to vote someone who might be a mason. Getting E-2 at less than 5 hours in isn't a good thing in this case.
It's definitely weird that Mix-los didn't get killed, but it could've been scum gearing up to try and say that one of them was on the scumteam

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:18 am
by Zyla
In post 241, Xlos wrote:But I personally don't see the slip that me and Zyla supposedly made. And since we weren't killed, does mafia even believe the claim T3 made? One possible reason that Roden was killed was because his agreement with T3 about me and Zyla being masons were seems a pretty town-power move, maybe he was trying to redirect the nightkill to one of us cause he knows we aren't masons. But maybe not, at the bottom of this post I have another possible reason.

I've given a lot (too much) thought to the idea that T3 and Zyla are evil and T3 pinned her with me for some reason, but it just doesn't seem that reasonable. I won't subject you to too much analysis about this for now, though.
Honestly, I think that that was just to drive confusion, since the general consensus would that you and mix were masons, and throwing me in there as the other could be anywhere from random, to me being his scumpartner, to trying to make me look bad. Most of his posts towards the end seemed to be just to create confusion, so I've just been ignoring them
In post 242, Xlos wrote:
In post 222, Gypyx wrote:
votecount 2.0
Spoiler:
Image
Unrelated, can someone explain this flavor? Are these just pictures of random rooms?
"The backrooms" is a series of corridors that you find yourself in and can never escape, it's got infinite 'creepily empty' rooms

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:23 am
by Gypyx
In post 244, Zyla wrote:"The backrooms" is a series of corridors that you find yourself in and can never escape, it's got infinite 'creepily empty' rooms
these are just flavor yes, with no relevance to the game, i'm just going down through the levels 1 by 1

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:24 am
by Gypyx
messed up the quote kinda, my bad

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:24 am
by Lukewarm
In post 130, Xlos wrote:Xlos mafia => Mix mafia
I'm not telling how I know this. Mix hasn't talked too much since the start of the day so I'd like to hear his thoughts on what is going on. So far he's sparked some discussion though.
@xlos
People thought that this was a mason crumb. Like you left a joke saying that you and mix were partnered, so that if either of you ever flipped as a mason then the other could point back to this to "prove" that they were your partner

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:32 am
by Xlos
In post 247, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 130, Xlos wrote:Xlos mafia => Mix mafia
I'm not telling how I know this. Mix hasn't talked too much since the start of the day so I'd like to hear his thoughts on what is going on. So far he's sparked some discussion though.
@xlos
People thought that this was a mason crumb. Like you left a joke saying that you and mix were partnered, so that if either of you ever flipped as a mason then the other could point back to this to "prove" that they were your partner
Oh, that makes some sense looking back. I was somewhat confused because I thought the claim being made was that me and Zyla were masons.

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:37 am
by Lukewarm
In post 248, Xlos wrote:
In post 247, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 130, Xlos wrote:Xlos mafia => Mix mafia
I'm not telling how I know this. Mix hasn't talked too much since the start of the day so I'd like to hear his thoughts on what is going on. So far he's sparked some discussion though.
@xlos
People thought that this was a mason crumb. Like you left a joke saying that you and mix were partnered, so that if either of you ever flipped as a mason then the other could point back to this to "prove" that they were your partner
Oh, that makes some sense looking back. I was somewhat confused because I thought the claim being made was that me and Zyla were masons.
T3 randomly switched mix for zyla, but there was a whole conversaton about "we should not dig into a crumb" revolved around that post, and then Roden even responded to me end of day that they had to kill one of you.

I think T3 decided to call out the crumb to reaction test, but did not look back to see who you actually crumbed with (because he knew he was getting ready to be hammered and did not want the thread to lock first)