Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2021 5:17 pm
post 26 is really bad but iirc from playing with flow trap before he just makes posts like that lmfao
tbh despite thinking this post isn't really AI from flow, I like that you're at least calling it out. Seeing no one do it made me ?In post 102, northsidegal wrote:i think that if i were RC i would kill you for this post aloneIn post 26, flow trap wrote:North has said nothing scummy idk why there's a wagon on them
Kinda like this game?In post 114, T3 wrote:I'm really awkward as scum in RVS>
eh, this is reasonable though, I agree nsg was towny and your flip on them looks goodIn post 122, T3 wrote:So yeah, actually.
Let's locktown me and nsg and yeet Farren into hell. VOTE: Farren
that's why it's funny dumb dumbIn post 221, flow trap wrote:Great now read my other joke which is totally unique I think post 26 :3
hmmIn post 134, Dannflor wrote:I was also immediately pinged by #26. It is averyodd comment to make two pages into the game when there are only two ostensibly RVS votes on northsidegal. This is compounded by the fact that Farren explained his vote clearly only a few votes before.
so, it seems like flow trap is both just posting an observation to post without actually thinking about the game on a deeper level. I also thought a townie entering the game here would interact more with the people already posting, or even join the already built wagon.
flow trap did neither so my observation in #13 was less tongue-in-cheek than might have been first interpreted. I didn't really scum read flow trap off of that, but that was my first reaction of, "huh that's a bit awkward." but then I tried to coax flow trap to join the wagon on NSG and they just refused for seemingly no real reason. I felt like he was using the cutesy-memey responses to avoid having to take responsibility foractivelyavoiding the wagon.
like i tend to think townies, especially in RVS, are on average more likely to swing their vote around and build wagons even for n/a reasons. I don't know flow trap and I'm probably not going to meta them anytime soon but I am still lacking a sense of why their approach to voting nsg was like oil on water
I don't think that overall really says anything about northsidegal's alignment, more just that flow trap seemed to be deliberately avoiding taking a bold stance (like being the third vote on a wagon could be seen as)
this is the second or third time Dannflor has asked something I wanted to as well, which I likeIn post 143, Dannflor wrote:what specifically about their scum meta are you feeling?In post 140, Ich Troje wrote:I think flow needs more content in terms of their reaction before i feel any level of confidence but im feeling their scum meta in their vibes.
VOTE: flow
E-2
nsg I love your profile picture btw lolIn post 153, northsidegal wrote:why are you townreading me or flow trap?
wait are you Koba?In post 163, Ich Troje wrote:omg i forgot esooa is in this game.
can you expand on this? partially cause i might have an opinion to contributeIn post 229, Esooa wrote: Agree with the farren vote atp too
did you just say you weren't going to give the thought immediately then you gave it in the same post?In post 220, redtea wrote:i have like one other thought but it's not relevant atm and i don't want to derail. Ask if you really want to know
basically i feel that either flow is sloppy scum or a false flag, and he feels more like the latter.
it also takes me a while to feel out who's just goofing and who's maf and goofing, so that definitely contributes to weak early reads of mine. sorry.
yeah, they're in thread asking questions and taking stuff seemingly serious but they're not actually solving at allIn post 235, redtea wrote:can you expand on this? partially cause i might have an opinion to contributeIn post 229, Esooa wrote: Agree with the farren vote atp too
do you want to share it?In post 238, redtea wrote:nono i still have the thought it's right here in my back pocket
my drafts only go through so much editing i'm afraid -.-
Have people seen T3 play like this btw? When I played with him last I meta read like 4 of his games and I've played with him twice and I've not seen it. I guess since he didn't do it as a wolf before it's not super wolfy but it's making me uncomfortable lmaoIn post 226, Esooa wrote:wow that t3 spam was awful
Kinda scummy too, he's being way more jokey than I remember as town, where he basically wasn't at all
yeah, okayIn post 237, Esooa wrote:yeah, they're in thread asking questions and taking stuff seemingly serious but they're not actually solving at allIn post 235, redtea wrote:can you expand on this? partially cause i might have an opinion to contributeIn post 229, Esooa wrote: Agree with the farren vote atp too
so anyways VOTE: farren
Any reason you didn't want to explain this before?In post 242, redtea wrote:yeah, okayIn post 237, Esooa wrote:yeah, they're in thread asking questions and taking stuff seemingly serious but they're not actually solving at allIn post 235, redtea wrote:can you expand on this? partially cause i might have an opinion to contributeIn post 229, Esooa wrote: Agree with the farren vote atp too
so anyways VOTE: farren
so my thought was
I also think Farren is playing it a little too easy. There is one way to look at his posts that would make me doubt he's maf, but for the most part nothing he's done is making me tr him. If someone's played with him before, any info would be helpful.
in other words, yeah ill throw them a vote
VOTE: farren
haven't played with him before but otherwise same which is why i can't imagine t3 and flow trap would be on the same maf team imoIn post 241, Esooa wrote:Have people seen T3 play like this btw? When I played with him last I meta read like 4 of his games and I've played with him twice and I've not seen it. I guess since he didn't do it as a wolf before it's not super wolfy but it's making me uncomfortable lmaoIn post 226, Esooa wrote:wow that t3 spam was awful
Kinda scummy too, he's being way more jokey than I remember as town, where he basically wasn't at all
you must not know my sufferingIn post 247, Esooa wrote:bruh why does that post have so many frowny faces lmao
False.In post 237, Esooa wrote:yeah, they're in thread asking questions and taking stuff seemingly serious but they're not actually solving at all
so anyways VOTE: farren