You would make a terrible poker player, Andante.In post 206, Andante wrote:Hey Val, I'm e-1... wanna hammer this? I'm a pr....
Ill take your word for the fact you are at e-1.
You would make a terrible poker player, Andante.In post 206, Andante wrote:Hey Val, I'm e-1... wanna hammer this? I'm a pr....
uhh not purposely taking it out of context no... kcda is voting me cause.. I was "forcing content"?? or something "sounded fake" NM is voting me cause I said NM is maf, Enchant is.. idk what enchant is doing, that vote kinda angers me but it's whatever, Val wants to vote me cause my "reads suck" and you vote me while saying my claim sucks. so yeah, there's all the reasonings in my mind that I recallIn post 223, JacksonVirgo wrote:First of all, you are either purposefully taking my case out of context to make it look worse or you are blinded and that's all you see of it.In post 222, Andante wrote:lol ahhh well, there's no shade there... if there is it's not intentional, but I'm just saying my interpretation of why you're voting me is cause of my "terrible claim"In post 219, JacksonVirgo wrote:Shading out of retaliation.In post 216, Andante wrote:oooh retaliatory shade... sounds kinda cool!!!! idk what that is though lolIn post 214, JacksonVirgo wrote:Add retaliatory shade to my list.In post 209, Andante wrote:Jackson, you're voting me FOR CLAIMING PR... want me to change my claim to VT?
I mean hey, I don't think maf is bold enough to do that, so you're likely town, but meh
Oh I'm terrible at poker, laugh at everythingIn post 225, Val89 wrote:You would make a terrible poker player, Andante.In post 206, Andante wrote:Hey Val, I'm e-1... wanna hammer this? I'm a pr....
Ill take your word for the fact you are at e-1.
INTENT TO HAMMER
You are aware that I want you to be Town no? I am actively holding shit back as much as I can to benefit you more than you know as to which which you are making it quite difficult.In post 231, Andante wrote:right... cause unvoting can happen after the e-1 vote...
I mean, I've talked to Val all game, I KNOW val is serious,...In post 235, JacksonVirgo wrote:You are aware that I want you to be Town no? I am actively holding shit back as much as I can to benefit you more than you know as to which which you are making it quite difficult.In post 231, Andante wrote:right... cause unvoting can happen after the e-1 vote...
And hammer vote cannot be undone, but the fact Val said intent means they aren't a fool that wants to hammer you without a claim. I cannot get mad at them if you refuse any further and they then vote, as I would do the same.
Claim. Final warning from me and if you don't I consider you lock-scum.
In post 237, Andante wrote:I mean, I've talked to Val all game, I KNOW val is serious,...In post 235, JacksonVirgo wrote:You are aware that I want you to be Town no? I am actively holding shit back as much as I can to benefit you more than you know as to which which you are making it quite difficult.In post 231, Andante wrote:right... cause unvoting can happen after the e-1 vote...
And hammer vote cannot be undone, but the fact Val said intent means they aren't a fool that wants to hammer you without a claim. I cannot get mad at them if you refuse any further and they then vote, as I would do the same.
Claim. Final warning from me and if you don't I consider you lock-scum.
Why would you say we were doomed or whatever you said about a vig role.In post 233, Andante wrote:whatever, I'm a vig, pew pew I shoot the bad guys!!
Why is this The Interrogation of Andante?In post 240, JacksonVirgo wrote:In post 237, Andante wrote:I mean, I've talked to Val all game, I KNOW val is serious,...In post 235, JacksonVirgo wrote:You are aware that I want you to be Town no? I am actively holding shit back as much as I can to benefit you more than you know as to which which you are making it quite difficult.In post 231, Andante wrote:right... cause unvoting can happen after the e-1 vote...
And hammer vote cannot be undone, but the fact Val said intent means they aren't a fool that wants to hammer you without a claim. I cannot get mad at them if you refuse any further and they then vote, as I would do the same.
Claim. Final warning from me and if you don't I consider you lock-scum.Why would you say we were doomed or whatever you said about a vig role.In post 233, Andante wrote:whatever, I'm a vig, pew pew I shoot the bad guys!!
OMG im laughing so damn hard.In post 233, Andante wrote:whatever, I'm a vig, pew pew I shoot the bad guys!!
seriously?In post 243, Kcdaspot wrote:OMG im laughing so damn hard.In post 233, Andante wrote:whatever, I'm a vig, pew pew I shoot the bad guys!!
if you're just a vig wtf was 171
no matter the result of this day and game you should probably just stick to mish mash lady.
holy fucking christ.
Mokeyboi has a point here. You say the modifer itself changes the GS reuslt. Where the base-role would in the case of a vigiIn post 171, Andante wrote:Actually... lmao I just looked up what my modifier does... I have a strong feeling we have a GS and my role just exists to mess up GS? ehhh idk, I already claimed more than enough, GS do not check me, you will get a "guilty" or whatever