Mafiascum.net

I will never trust luke

same tbhs

i feel like he can easily pull a fast one on us if he happened to be red

In post 85, Lukewarm wrote:I just played 2 back to back games with you when you were scum. The vibes are right this time.

You seem hella relaxed. I also liked you calling me scum, because in both of those games I spotted you as scum pre page 10, so I feel like you would want to keep me in your good graces if you were scum again.

This read was wrong the last time you posted it

In post 28, Bell wrote:So the monster in black.
And then there’s the others.

Who would the rest of the bad guys be? Like traitors? Dead weight?
I never watched lost.

In post 32, Bell wrote:Mafia is not determined by flavor.
Nvm. Skimmed rules.
Also I joined a bastard game.
And roles don’t flip with alignment. Which is fine because honestly I just get canfused with roles anyway

This could be scum trying to pull a fast one on us by pretending not to know

In post 138, Cephrir wrote:hi my role has a drawback and i haven't decided yet whether to claim harder than that or not

VOTE: enchant i don't think a rock will help us survive this situation

In post 210, Cephrir wrote:What if we didn't do this every time

I guess I should out my drawback as Hated if we're doing this again

What made you want to keep the hated part a secret initially?

In post 227, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 85, Lukewarm wrote:I just played 2 back to back games with you when you were scum. The vibes are right this time.

You seem hella relaxed. I also liked you calling me scum, because in both of those games I spotted you as scum pre page 10, so I feel like you would want to keep me in your good graces if you were scum again.

This read was wrong the last time you posted it

My read on her that you just linked in that game is not the same as what I said this game.

In that game I did a full scum case on her, and I thought her reaction to that case was townie. That is irrelevant to this game, as I have not scum cased her lol

You basically say "this is not how marci acts as scum" and "I like that she isn't pushing me" in the post I linked

Which is close to what you are saying in this game, too.

In post 229, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 138, Cephrir wrote:hi my role has a drawback and i haven't decided yet whether to claim harder than that or not

VOTE: enchant i don't think a rock will help us survive this situation

In post 210, Cephrir wrote:What if we didn't do this every time

I guess I should out my drawback as Hated if we're doing this again

What made you want to keep the hated part a secret initially?

I think my flavor is guessable or at least pretty narrow downable from that info and also another reason for later

No. You are comparing a read based on her general early prescence to a read based on how she responded under pressure. Those are distinctly different thing metrics.

Key words for the post you just linked:

In post 768, Lukewarm wrote:My experience with scum marci has been -

that under pressure she ...

The way that she responded under pressure that game turned my read around on her for a while. But, I correctly scum read her based off of her early presence that game.

can people voting Ceph tell me their thoughts on his posting so far
I feel like something rings genuine, which is probably a sign he's town because when he's been scum his posting has felt very mid
~GE

In post 228, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 28, Bell wrote:So the monster in black.
And then there’s the others.

Who would the rest of the bad guys be? Like traitors? Dead weight?
I never watched lost.

In post 32, Bell wrote:Mafia is not determined by flavor.
Nvm. Skimmed rules.
Also I joined a bastard game.
And roles don’t flip with alignment. Which is fine because honestly I just get canfused with roles anyway

This could be scum trying to pull a fast one on us by pretending not to know

Lol

In post 212, Cephrir wrote:

In post 191, PenguinPower wrote:all you vanity voters need to do something...shame on you.

Is this a joke?

Very clearly.

In post 229, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 138, Cephrir wrote:hi my role has a drawback and i haven't decided yet whether to claim harder than that or not

VOTE: enchant i don't think a rock will help us survive this situation

In post 210, Cephrir wrote:What if we didn't do this every time

I guess I should out my drawback as Hated if we're doing this again

What made you want to keep the hated part a secret initially?

rofl i thought he was joking

Like, my last two games with Marci, she was scum, and I was really sure she was scum by page 5

Mafia Invictus Redux

In post 97, Lukewarm wrote:I think marci is just scum here.

Moderators of the Discord Server

In post 32, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 24, marcistar wrote: wdym you thought i already knew

I think that that was a faked dumb tell, and that you are scum.

Yes, in the Invictus game I talked myself out of it, and then back into it a couple times throughout the game.

But based on early vibes, I feel like I have done pretty decent at spotting her recently - and my read on her right now is an early vibes read.

And hell, I very well might talk myself out of before the end of the game, but at this moment, I am town reading her early posting

In post 214, Off The Hook wrote:was this serious?

do you think it was?

In post 233, Lukewarm wrote:No. You are comparing a read based on her general early prescence to a read based on how she responded under pressure. Those are distinctly different thing metrics.

Key words for the post you just linked:

In post 768, Lukewarm wrote:My experience with scum marci has been -

that under pressure she ...

The way that she responded under pressure that game turned my read around on her for a while. But, I correctly scum read her based off of her early presence that game.

In post 238, Lukewarm wrote:Like, my last two games with Marci, she was scum, and I was really sure she was scum by page 5

Mafia Invictus Redux

In post 97, Lukewarm wrote:I think marci is just scum here.

Moderators of the Discord Server

In post 32, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 24, marcistar wrote: wdym you thought i already knew

I think that that was a faked dumb tell, and that you are scum.

Yes, in the Invictus game I talked myself out of it, and then back into it a couple times throughout the game.

But based on early vibes, I feel like I have done pretty decent at spotting her recently - and my read on her right now is an early vibes read.

And hell, I very well might talk myself out of before the end of the game, but at this moment, I am town reading her early posting

OK, I accept your reasoning. I think that your second post here going into more detail about is a facet of your town play and something you are more likely to skip out on as mafia.

In post 235, Bell wrote:

In post 228, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 28, Bell wrote:So the monster in black.
And then there’s the others.

Who would the rest of the bad guys be? Like traitors? Dead weight?
I never watched lost.

In post 32, Bell wrote:Mafia is not determined by flavor.
Nvm. Skimmed rules.
Also I joined a bastard game.
And roles don’t flip with alignment. Which is fine because honestly I just get canfused with roles anyway

This could be scum trying to pull a fast one on us by pretending not to know

Lol

In post 237, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 229, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 138, Cephrir wrote:hi my role has a drawback and i haven't decided yet whether to claim harder than that or not

VOTE: enchant i don't think a rock will help us survive this situation

In post 210, Cephrir wrote:What if we didn't do this every time

I guess I should out my drawback as Hated if we're doing this again

What made you want to keep the hated part a secret initially?

rofl i thought he was joking

I don't joke around

In post 232, Cephrir wrote:

In post 229, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 138, Cephrir wrote:hi my role has a drawback and i haven't decided yet whether to claim harder than that or not

VOTE: enchant i don't think a rock will help us survive this situation

In post 210, Cephrir wrote:What if we didn't do this every time

I guess I should out my drawback as Hated if we're doing this again

What made you want to keep the hated part a secret initially?

I think my flavor is guessable or at least pretty narrow downable from that info and also another reason for later

clearly Ceph is Hated Godfather

but this is the part where he talks his way out of the lim with his godlike persuasion abilities and then manipulates us into killing each other

I don't think we should continue to push Cephrir without pointing to real reasons for doing so. Partially because it would be annoying for them, and partially because there are several people who voted for Cephrir who haven't given any reasoning for why they are doing so.

Every Michael Emerson scene is so good

In post 240, Dunnstral wrote:OK, I accept your reasoning. I think that your second post here going into more detail about is a facet of your town play and something you are more likely to skip out on as mafia.

Hmmm

I feel like my incessant need to make sure that people understand what I am trying to say when they appear to not understand is not alignment indicative for me, but sure.

In post 142, Frogsterking wrote:VOTE: csf for not providing a reason in their RVS vote

I have 1 serious town read and 1 serious scum read and I'm going to keep quiet on them for a little while.

You are being pretentious about this. Nobody else has placed great importance to your reads and there is no real reason for you to keep this information hidden.

In post 171, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 169, Rad wrote:

In post 168, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I actually have no idea why we're wagoning Cephrir BUT

He is probably the ONLY player on the site who rolls scum more frequently then I do

so it's a fine place to start

VOTE: Cephrir

Eventually you'd expect that heavy lean to equalize, yeah? So... shouldn't we lean town on him if we're going to draw conclusions based on rate of scum?

That's gambler's fallacy

Saying that he rolls scum frequently so he is more likely to be scum this game as well is also gambler's fallacy. That is what is being said in post 168, but you only call out post 169.

In post 247, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 240, Dunnstral wrote:OK, I accept your reasoning. I think that your second post here going into more detail about is a facet of your town play and something you are more likely to skip out on as mafia.

Hmmm

I feel like my incessant need to make sure that people understand what I am trying to say when they appear to not understand is not alignment indicative for me, but sure.

Maybe not. This is my own understanding of how you would play as town.