Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2022 2:49 am
I'm going to puke if my solve is correct. I'm most willing to reassess on Gandhi.
That's my bad I'm pretty sure I started that trend
That's my bad I'm pretty sure I started that trend
In post 225, Frogsterking wrote:I'm going to puke if my solve is correct. I'm most willing to reassess on Gandhi.
In post 227, Frogsterking wrote:Ego
the fact that you have hoppip above "lurkers always scum in there"(which i disagree with, on rational principle) worries me.In post 219, DeltaWave wrote: asuka strikes me as town.
furtiveglance also strikes me as town. although his vote against me is wrong, the rationale seems towny.
bbt, on the other hand, strikes me as someone who wanted to piggyback off furtive's reasoning to join a relatively uncontroversial wagon that coincidentally targets the main person campaigning against inutile.
hoppip is neutral, leaning town. the rationale for sussing me wasn't great but is the kind of rationale i could expect from townspeople.
nuclear g - again, not sure what to make of this player since i just don't have a read on them and i'm confused as to why this is the biggest wagon rn. i'm not saying it's wrong, just don't know if it's right
juice, hut, miralax, and mohab all fall into the same category for me, which are low activity lurkers. there is ALWAYS scum in this group on d1. i wouldn't be surprised if juice is scum who is letting us slug it out. only two posts and still maintaining an RVS vote when we're nine pages in.
i wouldn't be terribly surprised if it's inutile/juice/bbt, assuming a standard 10:3 split.
I haven't outed my other 2 scumreads yet in an effort not to alarm them. My plan is to explain all of my reads after I get replies from my survey. I've been procrastinating posting my survey.In post 228, Eiralox wrote:im sorry im a bit of a tipsy lazy reader today. what xactly is ur solve? excluding gandhi, let's assume they are tovn for this experiment, vhich 3 slots vould u say are scum?
In post 231, Frogsterking wrote:I haven't outed my other 2 scumreads yet in an effort not to alarm them. My plan is to explain all of my reads after I get replies from my survey. I've been procrastinating posting my survey.In post 228, Eiralox wrote:im sorry im a bit of a tipsy lazy reader today. what xactly is ur solve? excluding gandhi, let's assume they are tovn for this experiment, vhich 3 slots vould u say are scum?
tbh furtive gave me town vibes from the start. the gandhi pairing was more of a test and i like their reaction to it. i never like to be certain, complacent, so my read on furtive was a fabrication. i hope im right and they're green cos they've felt like it thus far.In post 233, Frogsterking wrote:Do you still think furtive is scum? From my point of view your interaction looks quite a bit TvT.
It is usually true that at least one mafia will lurk in order to avoid attention. It is very interesting that you perked up now that I've thrown a bit of shade on you by including you in the lurker category.In post 230, Eiralox wrote:
the fact that you have hoppip above "lurkers always scum in there"(which i disagree with, on rational principle) worries me.
the fact that you don't address Frogster, who is obvious town, worries me.
The fact that you are not happy with the gandhi wagon this early worries me.
The fact that juice isn't at null worries me.
why do you worry me?
i do not really understand why you’re discounting the player familiar with me (greeting) saying i play like this nor why you haven’t simply looked at my previous games yourself, but to make it very easy here are my isos from a few of my most recent games:In post 219, DeltaWave wrote:i truly do not understand why people see inutile as town. as i said before, if there's evidence that she always plays this way (even as town) then my tune might change but to date, nobody has done so unless I somehow missed it.
This is a clear indicator to me that my first solve was wrong.In post 237, Juice wrote:someone scum reads me for my RVS - ROFLCOPTER
Yes you asked him something I wanted to ask him, it was something along the lines of why he was he voting for someone he's TRing (Gandhi). Anyway, things got cleared up as the game progressed.In post 148, furtiveglance wrote:Did I ask Frogsterking a question that you wanted to ask him, or did you want to ask me a question?In post 132, hutmeil wrote:UNVOTE: Furtive
I had the same question as him for Frog which I TR him for.
In post 235, DeltaWave wrote:It is usually true that at least one mafia will lurk in order to avoid attention. It is very interesting that you perked up now that I've thrown a bit of shade on you by including you in the lurker category.In post 230, Eiralox wrote:
the fact that you have hoppip above "lurkers always scum in there"(which i disagree with, on rational principle) worries me.
the fact that you don't address Frogster, who is obvious town, worries me.
The fact that you are not happy with the gandhi wagon this early worries me.
The fact that juice isn't at null worries me.
why do you worry me?
I forgot about frogater. Id say neutral leaning town but it's not super solid.
I never said I wasn't happy with the ghandi wagon. I just don't really understand it. Don't misrep me.
Let me guess. You are trying to slow walk your way onto my wagon so you can be with bbt.
Clinging to that rvs for dear life lmao
Interesting that he started his RVS on page 8. It could be he's just getting started.
it's page 10. so? juice is still null. im not against any votes there but data-wise iffy. why do I get the feeling that you're hunting for easy elims Delta?
OH yeah that must be why I'm still voting inutileIn post 245, Eiralox wrote:it's page 10. so? juice is still null. im not against any votes there but data-wise iffy. why do I get the feeling that you're hunting for easy elims Delta?
In post 246, DeltaWave wrote:OH yeah that must be why I'm still voting inutileIn post 245, Eiralox wrote:it's page 10. so? juice is still null. im not against any votes there but data-wise iffy. why do I get the feeling that you're hunting for easy elims Delta?
Try to make up better rationales please
Sorry.
I don't fully agree with this. Casting suspicion on players who are obvtownIn post 219, DeltaWave wrote: that's a fallacy that even very seasoned mafia players make, so i'll call it a null for you. specifically, I'm referring to the idea that if you think Player A is town and Player B votes for Player A then Player B is likely mafia. makes assumptions that aren't true, and day 1 usually consists of town primarily going at each other while mafia eggs it on or hides. but like I said, even people who have played many many games make this mistake so I will call it a null for you.
Is 67 the only reason you are sussingIn post 219, DeltaWave wrote:i'm standing by my position that inutile is sus and i really don't care that it's making people scumread me. i'm not going to back off what i think is my best read right now because it's unpopular or it might get me eliminated. clearly, an inutile elimination is not going to happen right now based on how people are reading her but i don't operate on consensus like that. i truly do not understand why people see inutile as town. as i said before, if there's evidence that she always plays this way (even as town) then my tune might change but to date, nobody has done so unless I somehow missed it. you can think i'm mafia all you want but i would have picked a safer bet than this if that was the case. if you really think that mafia will wagon popular players instead of killing them at night i dont know what to tell you.