Mafiascum.net

Wondering the same.

In post 2244, Gamma Emerald wrote: The thread is pretty long so I don’t care to go back if someone can help me now
Thanks RCE btw

Sorry didn't mean to sound douchey. What I meant is that asking for help it's usually suboptimal since other players could give you a biased stance of what happened, and the best way to have an unbiased read is well... Doing it yourself. RCE did a good job tho; Thor, not so much. I mean, I have the same impression, but clearly inclined in favor of Tails when you're asking for info and not an opinion.

In post 2193, RCEnigma wrote:Lol I'd vig Gamma for that alone.

Flavor care to enlighten this poor fool?

In post 2198, RCEnigma wrote:Can we get chickadee today and DGB tomorrow? If I need the puppy dog eyes ok but...

No.
Chick/Clem seems to be a LHF push based on activity

In post 2214, Wisdom wrote:now im interested in who tails is
off to althunt

Figured it out: have you?

In post 2252, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2193, RCEnigma wrote:Lol I'd vig Gamma for that alone.

Flavor care to enlighten this poor fool?

Oh no I'm aware of the reference lol.

In post 2198, RCEnigma wrote:Can we get chickadee today and DGB tomorrow? If I need the puppy dog eyes ok but...

Oh, skipped this post. If Clem flips scum, Nero shouldn't pass the night. If he does, I'm going all in

In post 2255, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 2252, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2193, RCEnigma wrote:Lol I'd vig Gamma for that alone.

Flavor care to enlighten this poor fool?

Oh no I'm aware of the reference lol.

Then why would you unironically call for a vig on that ewwwww

So those things on the DrewVa v Tails thing were enlightening but didn’t give me what I needed. The thing DrewVa said about having done things to try and change Tails’ mind struck me as possibly scummy for trying to get townread over scumhunting, but also seemed somewhat pure in feelings, so I want to determine whether the feelings outweigh the potential scum motivation for me.

In post 2253, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2198, RCEnigma wrote:Can we get chickadee today and DGB tomorrow? If I need the puppy dog eyes ok but...

No.
Chick/Clem seems to be a LHF push based on activity

You didn't read any of the cases. Clemency then came in and had even worse interactions under the threat of pressure. He gave himself a 48 hour window but I expect it to be much more of the same poor defense of his slot despite stating he was read up at the time. His only read was also on Chickadee...his slot.

Don't know either of these players, Clemency feels like scum with limited range (no offense, personally my scum range is very limited as well).

Because it's a line I would unironically vig you for.

In post 2251, pinturicchio wrote:usually suboptimal since other players could give you a biased stance of what happened, and the best way to have an unbiased read is well... Doing it yourself. RCE did a good job tho; Thor, not so much.

You are incorrect - i did a better job because I offered opinions upon the facts.
RCE avoided doing so.
Lrn2scumhunt

Yeah I don’t see why scum plays like that unless they’re super dedicated to a WIFOM strat, which I doubt Clemency does, cos while they’ve been on site for some time I still perceive them as a newb
Also why would you unironically vig me for a joke you were 100% aware of? That’s hella gross and looks scummy.

I have my own thoughts about it, waiting to see what comes of it. Didn't mind hearing Thor's thoughts on it. Any input from Thor is helpful to determine his alignment at the very least, it destroys the early scumreads on his slot that we're based on activity and lack of contribution.

world's best newb ever
while i suck at putting my thoughts into words i generally play the way i do because i try to be entertaining
so far it's worked for me but it's awful when i have to replace in to a polar opposite of myself

i'm around again now btw so lay it on me sweethearts

Ok, explain to me why town plays like that then. Also explain to me why telling you I would shoot you for it is scummy.

Youre pretty entertaining, I like you. Not enough to not Lynch you though. Sorry.

In post 2261, Thor665 wrote:

In post 2251, pinturicchio wrote:usually suboptimal since other players could give you a biased stance of what happened, and the best way to have an unbiased read is well... Doing it yourself. RCE did a good job tho; Thor, not so much.

You are incorrect - i did a better job because I offered opinions upon the facts.
RCE avoided doing so.
Lrn2scumhunt

If he's town, it's his job to scumhunt for himself, not yours. That's what I meant. As I said, I agree with your opinion in that subject, but I don't think what he needed was an opinion

well i'm assuming if i don't die day 1 i'm taking a bullet n1 so i'm just gonna drop trying to defend myself and try to give a read or two

In post 2268, pinturicchio wrote:

In post 2261, Thor665 wrote:

In post 2251, pinturicchio wrote:usually suboptimal since other players could give you a biased stance of what happened, and the best way to have an unbiased read is well... Doing it yourself. RCE did a good job tho; Thor, not so much.

You are incorrect - i did a better job because I offered opinions upon the facts.
RCE avoided doing so.
Lrn2scumhunt

If he's town, it's his job to scumhunt for himself, not yours. That's what I meant. As I said, I agree with your opinion in that subject, but I don't think what he needed was an opinion

I agree it's his job to scumhunt.
The only way he's scumhunting by asking that question is to get people to offer views.
So I helped his useless behavior become scumhunting for everyone.
RCE did nothing and added to the post count of the game.
Gamma basically did nothing and added to the post count of the game.
I provided scumhunting.

But if you think people re-quoting other people's posts (which would be the theory 'best' answer to Gamma's question by your stated assessment here, or the secondary possibility of telling someone to go read who is providing us clear evidence they don't care to go read) then I submit you're doing it wrong.

What's your take on Tails v. DrewVa?
Not a description of it, but an opinion upon it.

In post 2264, Clemency wrote:but it's awful when i have to replace in to a polar opposite of myself

How does this possibly matter?

In post 2271, Thor665 wrote:

In post 2264, Clemency wrote:but it's awful when i have to replace in to a polar opposite of myself

How does this possibly matter?

because there's a certain implication already on the slot, so it'll always look off when it suddenly 180's

In post 2270, Thor665 wrote:

In post 2268, pinturicchio wrote:

In post 2261, Thor665 wrote:

In post 2251, pinturicchio wrote:usually suboptimal since other players could give you a biased stance of what happened, and the best way to have an unbiased read is well... Doing it yourself. RCE did a good job tho; Thor, not so much.

You are incorrect - i did a better job because I offered opinions upon the facts.
RCE avoided doing so.
Lrn2scumhunt

If he's town, it's his job to scumhunt for himself, not yours. That's what I meant. As I said, I agree with your opinion in that subject, but I don't think what he needed was an opinion

I agree it's his job to scumhunt.
The only way he's scumhunting by asking that question is to get people to offer views.
So I helped his useless behavior become scumhunting for everyone.
RCE did nothing and added to the post count of the game.
Gamma basically did nothing and added to the post count of the game.
I provided scumhunting.

But if you think people re-quoting other people's posts (which would be the theory 'best' answer to Gamma's question by your stated assessment here, or the secondary possibility of telling someone to go read who is providing us clear evidence they don't care to go read) then I submit you're doing it wrong.

What's your take on Tails v. DrewVa?
Not a description of it, but an opinion upon it.

Note this is a recurring theme in Gammas iso.

In post 2270, Thor665 wrote:

In post 2268, pinturicchio wrote:

In post 2261, Thor665 wrote:

In post 2251, pinturicchio wrote:usually suboptimal since other players could give you a biased stance of what happened, and the best way to have an unbiased read is well... Doing it yourself. RCE did a good job tho; Thor, not so much.

You are incorrect - i did a better job because I offered opinions upon the facts.
RCE avoided doing so.
Lrn2scumhunt

If he's town, it's his job to scumhunt for himself, not yours. That's what I meant. As I said, I agree with your opinion in that subject, but I don't think what he needed was an opinion

I agree it's his job to scumhunt.
The only way he's scumhunting by asking that question is to get people to offer views.
So I helped his useless behavior become scumhunting for everyone.
RCE did nothing and added to the post count of the game.
Gamma basically did nothing and added to the post count of the game.
I provided scumhunting.

But if you think people re-quoting other people's posts (which would be the theory 'best' answer to Gamma's question by your stated assessment here, or the secondary possibility of telling someone to go read who is providing us clear evidence they don't care to go read) then I submit you're doing it wrong.

What's your take on Tails v. DrewVa?
Not a description of it, but an opinion upon it.

Well I did give an opinion, just not on what you two were focusing on