Page 91 of 323
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:50 pm
by RadiantCowbells
8 people need to be in the coalition outside of tmck
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:51 pm
by OkaPoka
In post 2249, Titus wrote: In post 2244, OkaPoka wrote:Why you should not double 1 of 4 anymore
Scum give us 1 of 4 pool which guarantees us at least one scum.
Let's say there is 1 scum and three town. We have a 25% chance of hitting scum here.
If we hit scum, tmck can repick 1of4 and get nightkilled and we gucchi.
If we hit town, tmck repciks 1of4, draws nk.
Scum runs the same pool of 1of4 with 1 scum, 2 town, and one new person.
And we've learned nothing.
I can sheep this. If we do coalition, you agree that my scenarios are all valid? If we have that foundation, we can knock down how they should be drafted.
yes, but im saying for the sake of PoE we should only eliminate until we hit 1 scum in the coalition and then move onto the next coalition.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:51 pm
by OkaPoka
But we don't start lynching until we coalition twice.
Action order.
Coalition -> Repick coalition -> Eliminate coalition 1 scum -> Eliminate coalition 2 scum -> 1 of 4
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:52 pm
by NanceFloor
VOTE: coalition
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:52 pm
by OkaPoka
pls let everyone check in before we vote coalition
I don't want to risk anything yet.
We have time
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:53 pm
by Titus
In post 2248, OkaPoka wrote:Titus you are misunderstanding what I mean
We coalition twice, with two pools of different four.
If we succeed any, we win ok.
If we fail both, then we know both pools have at least "1 scum"
Therefore we should PoE lynch out the coalition pool until we hit the "1 scum" from each pool. Then move to next pool.
This will leave us with 1 scum left, we will have lynched 2 scum in the PoE and 1 scum already.
Then we 1of4 for final PoE. Which guarantees us scum lynch,
I don't see how the final 2 of 4 guarantees a scum lynch as the last scum could be in all the pools. I still think the action order is correct though.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:53 pm
by RadiantCowbells
ok ok i counterclaim repicker i am the real repicker tmck is confirmed scum
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by chennisden
In post 2248, OkaPoka wrote:Titus you are misunderstanding what I mean
We coalition twice, with two pools of different four.
If we succeed any, we win ok.
If we fail both, then we know both pools have at least "1 scum"
Therefore we should PoE lynch out the coalition pool until we hit the "1 scum" from each pool. Then move to next pool.
This will leave us with 1 scum left, we will have lynched 2 scum in the PoE and 1 scum already.
Then we 1of4 for final PoE. Which guarantees us scum lynch,
we need a pool of EIGHT.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by NanceFloor
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by RadiantCowbells
okapoka must also be scum because he tmid the knowledge that tmck was fake
so we have guilties on okapoka and tmck
gg
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by chennisden
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by OkaPoka
Scum must put a mafia member in 1of4
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by RadiantCowbells
3 confirmed scum
okapoka nancefloor tmck
ring 'er up
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by OkaPoka
Please don't troll.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:55 pm
by OkaPoka
I am actively avoiding scumhunting.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:55 pm
by chennisden
Oka, do you UNDERSTAND what coalition is?
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:55 pm
by NanceFloor
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm
by chennisden
We need to pick a total of NINE people.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm
by RadiantCowbells
good:1of4
Coalition
ok: Treestump
Protect
Arena
Call a Friend
Reveal
Vengeful
awful:
Dance
Popcorn
Quiz
Rank
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm
by OkaPoka
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm
by RadiantCowbells
actually
veto is pretty good tbh
idk how it didn't make the list
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:57 pm
by OkaPoka
anyways deadline doesnt carry over so we can spend our time as much as we want
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:57 pm
by Titus
In post 2259, RadiantCowbells wrote:okapoka must also be scum because he tmid the knowledge that tmck was fake
so we have guilties on okapoka and tmck
gg
Do you feel Oka's plan is bad? Where's the flaw?
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:57 pm
by OkaPoka
i feel like i said veto was good for eliminating pools
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:59 pm
by RadiantCowbells
In post 2272, Titus wrote: In post 2259, RadiantCowbells wrote:okapoka must also be scum because he tmid the knowledge that tmck was fake
so we have guilties on okapoka and tmck
gg
Do you feel Oka's plan is bad? Where's the flaw?
i want to win the game with the second coalition and if we're doing first set of people then leftovers you can nearly guarantee that we won't end up with a 3/0 setup