One Night Ultimate Ultimate Werewolf - Game Over

chennisden · Post Post #2250 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 11:56 am

im a ras alt and i lost.

Formerfish · Post Post #2251 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 12:49 pm

In post 2226, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 2220, Formerfish wrote:
In post 2210, Flavor Leaf wrote:Look at those beautiful untouched wolves.

Tbh, I had no clue what I was, but I figured I was some sort of scum, and when you said you switched me, I assumed you knew what I was, and you weren’t being against me, so I figured we were the same.

Fair assumption, but I didnt even know what my action did to you. I think I switched your card with the center card. I just lucked out picking a fake claim before the real claim could come out.

Raven1207 · Post Post #2252 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 12:59 pm

One thing I hated that I told the mod in the pms is that he was missing part of the script for when the Doppelganger copies another player's role on certain roles. With the app, it would say stuff like, "Doppelganger, if you viewed XXX, do XXX". Even if the Doppelganger didn't copy that specific role, the script for doing those part are still important. A person could still use them as a claim if they are evil. Or if the Doppelganger turns evil, they could use them as an excuse. It pissed me off a little when the mod ignore me and said it was irrelevant to put on the script. But to be honest, if you are using every role in the series, then every part of the script matters. In fact, on BGG, I was doing an all random game where anyone could any possible role(this was before ONUSV was a thing and I wrote a script that was very worded that can be seen here:

https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/203751 ... -it-win-it

And everything was included it including all the Doppelganger ones.

I felt cautious before joining this and my feelings seem to have been right about joining this, it's beside to what I already said, that I had a very good feeling the Villager Team was going to lose as our winning was more harder than the other teams. When you have 81 players with many different winning conditions, it is hard to point in the direction that would give the most players a win. It's hard for everyone to "trust" that we going to vote for the right people with this big of a group. Some of us had no info to go on and had to trust the people who did. Others like me and pytdarque would be apprehensive on who's team we were going to end with. Others like the suicidal roles and their apprentices knew they were going to lose. The Alien Team would in deep dooty with both Groob and Zerb outting their team and hoping the other died(Which also heart the Leader's chances of winning). I feel like this was a bad idea of doing with all the chaos there were. Although it could have been more worst if the Village Idiot didn't start in the center. It could have screwed teams more and could have made it where most of the Indies would have won and left the other teams, Villagers and bad guys.

ISO · Post Post #2253 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 1:28 pm

In post 2252, Raven1207 wrote:I feel like this was a bad idea

NotAJumbleOfNumbers · Post Post #2254 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 2:40 pm

In post 2174, Chemist1422 wrote:I should feel upset but tbh I don’t really care

legit awol'd after posting like 5 times

Chemist1422 · Post Post #2255 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 2:41 pm

In post 2133, Chemist1422 wrote:one night ultimate what is even going on

Maruchan · Post Post #2256 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 3:01 pm

In post 2184, Ircher wrote:
In post 2182, vonflare wrote:
In post 2178, Ircher wrote:Well it's a good thing this game isn't going on my wiki.
how dare you this is the greatest and most important game ever run on this site
It's not mafia and even if it were, it's so bastard that no one has a reasonable shot at winning.

Excuse me. I won. Intentionally

ISO · Post Post #2257 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 3:27 pm

You were trying to win?! That's so rude to the other factions

Aristophanes · Post Post #2258 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:24 pm

In post 2257, the worst wrote:You were trying to win?! That's so rude to the other factions

We won too, Worsty, so...

ofrhz · Post Post #2259 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:27 pm

tfw I lost but still don’t understand how I lost

vonflare · Post Post #2260 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:36 pm

In post 2259, ofrhz wrote:tfw I lost but still don’t understand how I lost

this is the intended feeling

jjh927 · Post Post #2261 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:36 pm

We lost because people were in a rush to end the day, mostly for no good reason, and night started before we confirmed the plan with key individuals

jjh927 · Post Post #2262 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:40 pm

Also I still maintain that it was a really bad moderator decision to end the day early with what, 50% of votes? We were not properly informed about this mechanic, and it was a rule change midgame that wasn't elaborated on in any detail at any point that happened with no warning. This kind of thing should always require both unanimity and good communication.

Maruchan · Post Post #2263 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:45 pm

Unanimity in a game with 81 players and people who hadn't even posted in the game? Okay

Jingle · Post Post #2264 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:53 pm

In post 2262, jjh927 wrote:Also I still maintain that it was a really bad moderator decision to end the day early with what, 50% of votes? We were not properly informed about this mechanic, and it was a rule change midgame that wasn't elaborated on in any detail at any point that happened with no warning. This kind of thing should always require both unanimity and good communication.

Normally, I'd agree with you. In reality, I think the EoD was more in keeping with the spirit of One Night than the rest of the game combined, and was actually pretty much perfect as an end to this game.

jjh927 · Post Post #2265 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 4:59 pm

In post 2263, Maruchan wrote:Unanimity in a game with 81 players and people who hadn't even posted in the game? Okay

Yep. Or at least something closer to it than 50%, which just isn't enough.

Aristophanes · Post Post #2266 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:02 pm

I was perfectly okay with it all. I felt it had been talked to death and the game was at a high rink of losing people and interest if it had continued further.

Formerfish · Post Post #2267 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:03 pm

In post 2261, jjh927 wrote:We lost because people were in a rush to end the day, mostly for no good reason, and night started before we confirmed the plan with key individuals

I wanted to rush the day because I felt it helped me as a wolf.

jjh927 · Post Post #2268 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:06 pm

Well yeah, the fact that it's a midgame rule change to the benefit and detriment of different factions in the game is what makes it such a bad decision

Formerfish · Post Post #2269 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:08 pm

Don't hate the player hate the gam... Wait, nevermind.

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #2270 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:17 pm

I don’t think this was ever expected to be some masterpiece of a game, tbh.

It was just an event game that we should just appreciate for what it was.

If y’all want, I’ll run an 81 player game that everyone can consider solid gameplay, but trust me.

NOBODY WANTS THAT.

that’s just toxic city and year +

Jingle · Post Post #2271 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:20 pm

Do Eeeet. But also, 30+ dayvigs of like 6 different alignments.

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #2272 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:43 pm

In post 2271, Jingle wrote:Do Eeeet. But also, 30+ dayvigs of like 6 different alignments.

Yeah, I could do a big one soon. Hmm....maybe not 81 yet.

I do have 2 games after Boon Wars in the works. Hmm...

Aristophanes · Post Post #2273 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:47 pm

chennisden · Post Post #2274 (ISO) » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:48 pm

In post 2262, jjh927 wrote:Also I still maintain that it was a really bad moderator decision to end the day early with what, 50% of votes? We were not properly informed about this mechanic, and it was a rule change midgame that wasn't elaborated on in any detail at any point that happened with no warning. This kind of thing should always require both unanimity and good communication.

Agree to some extent. I don't think it should be unanimous but definitely a supermajority