Mafiascum.net

boop

i think both players had at least some aforementioned read on me, and they didnt try to posture their vote with a reasoning i disagree with

my reads in poorly formatted list

[Titus, Bee]
[CSF. the worst, PP, Auro, House]
[S_S, Thor, MM] null
[Enchant, Gamma]
[Flea]

mmm - that's not a horrible readlist. some swaps imo, but ok.

In post 2252, ManateeGal wrote:my reads in poorly formatted list

[Titus, Bee]
[CSF. the worst, PP, Auro, House]
[S_S, Thor, MM] null
[Enchant, Gamma]
[Flea]

At this point, I'd swap Titus & Gamma in your list.

How in the hell is Bee top town?

CSF is good. the worst is fine

PP is way too high.

I don't get the Auro read.

All your null reads have 100+ posts. Does the fact they've made plenty of content without being readable mean anything to you at all? The only correct read for Thor on d1 is "Thor is Thor".

Enchant, eh, I've kinda cooled on him myself. No objections there.

flea, I'm trying to wrap my head around. Show me whatcha got on faer, please.

hey - would be better just to give yours to compare!

but sure - let's confound and make it difficult.

In post 2255, PenguinPower wrote:hey - would be better just to give yours to compare!

You, Titus, or MG are my vote options at this point. MG or Titus, preferably. I'm concerned that our friction may not be game related.

Cool. It at all what I said. You picked at the reads list without providing your own when that probably would have been the best venue to show disagreement instead of “too high too low”

Of course given I’m quite comfortable voting sea cow I would love to hear that expounded upon as well.

In post 2258, PenguinPower wrote:Cool. It at all what I said. You picked at the reads list without providing your own when that probably would have been the best venue to show disagreement instead of “too high too low”

I've made my opinion of posting full readslists known, but simply saying i disagree with MG's list as she posted it wouldn't really mean much.

Cool.

Think I’m just going to have to read you like I would read me.

In post 2220, ManateeGal wrote:ok im gonna lay this out as calmly as i can cos today has been very very frustrating in and out of game.

house you are either purposely or unconciously misunderstanding and miscontruing my statements regarding my wagon. gammas vote on me was directly after bee placed their vote stating they wanted to wagon me to develop a read. i thought this was odd considering gamma had already stated. i am begging u to look critically and analytically at my statement and think about context.

this kinda makes sense but just because I followed Bee doesn't mean I shared her reason for voting you

In post 2251, ManateeGal wrote:i think both players had at least some aforementioned read on me, and they didnt try to posture their vote with a reasoning i disagree with

hmmmm

In post 2252, ManateeGal wrote:my reads in poorly formatted list

[Titus, Bee]
[CSF. the worst, PP, Auro, House]
[S_S, Thor, MM] null
[Enchant, Gamma]
[Flea]

In post 2257, House wrote:

In post 2255, PenguinPower wrote:hey - would be better just to give yours to compare!

You, Titus, or MG are my vote options at this point. MG or Titus, preferably. I'm concerned that our friction may not be game related.

this is intriguing given you objected to Enchant's PP Sr earlier, unless I misinterpreted

In post 1884, Gamma Emerald wrote:CSF, House, and ig Titus are the people I feel like are solidly town
tw is probably close behind, and PP is also probably up there

Beyond that I don’t feel like there’s too much I feel good about

I'm still pretty much holding the line on this

In post 2220, ManateeGal wrote:ok im gonna lay this out as calmly as i can cos today has been very very frustrating in and out of game.

house you are either purposely or unconciously misunderstanding and miscontruing my statements regarding my wagon. gammas vote on me was directly after bee placed their vote stating they wanted to wagon me to develop a read. i thought this was odd considering gamma had already stated. i am begging u to look critically and analytically at my statement and think about context.

It was rude of me not to reply, my apologies.

I think you're being wrongheaded about Gamma.

I never thought that he voted for you for the same reason Bee did. You, for some reason or other, seem to have made that assumption.

If i give up on voting a scumread because nobody else is getting on the wagon, I'll jump right back on if there is renewed interest. That looked to me to be what Gamma was doing.

Yeah - pretty comfortable with town!gamma

In post 2265, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2257, House wrote:

In post 2255, PenguinPower wrote:hey - would be better just to give yours to compare!

You, Titus, or MG are my vote options at this point. MG or Titus, preferably. I'm concerned that our friction may not be game related.

this is intriguing given you objected to Enchant's PP Sr earlier, unless I misinterpreted

I believe you misinterpreted.

In post 1589, Enchant wrote:Actually Penguin asked why i townread you, so i answered, then shit thrown on the fan and it started.

In post 1590, House wrote:

In post 1559, Enchant wrote:I townread House, because i find his nature of posting a townie. He was plenty understandbly annoyed by Thor. I disliked push on him at all, because you seemed just sheeping Gamma who made up accusation like "Can't tell why but he is mafia". Like, i too have another reasons for townreading him, but can't tell them, now what?

You cannot blame Peng for this.

I wasn't objecting to a read. I was objecting to him trying to shed responsibility for his posts.

gamma is probably town

Speaking of Enchant, he's been awfully quiet lately.

we could just flash elim enchant for the laughs.

In post 2263, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2220, ManateeGal wrote:ok im gonna lay this out as calmly as i can cos today has been very very frustrating in and out of game.

house you are either purposely or unconciously misunderstanding and miscontruing my statements regarding my wagon. gammas vote on me was directly after bee placed their vote stating they wanted to wagon me to develop a read. i thought this was odd considering gamma had already stated. i am begging u to look critically and analytically at my statement and think about context.

this kinda makes sense but just because I followed Bee doesn't mean I shared her reason for voting you

ohh i guess i could understand that. i'll admit my conclusion on you was wrong then

In post 2272, the worst wrote:we could just flash elim enchant for the laughs.

i would be fine w this