Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:11 pm
Also I'm not in the mood for your bullshit right now so don't push me, mmkay?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Here, in case you're fucking illiterate, I spelled it out like I would teach a five year old. And super-sized, so you don't miss any of it.
In post 2279, Elyse wrote:Yeah pretending I'm stupid won't help your cause.
There are three other scum besides NS and you only named two.
You're lookin' pretty stupid from this end.In post 2274, Majiffy wrote:And we'll cross that bridge when we get there.
I'm hostile because your inability for basic reading comprehension has made this game unenjoyable.In post 2280, Elyse wrote:And why do you have to be so hostile? You're one of the main reasons this game is unenjoyable.
Quote it, then.In post 2288, Elyse wrote:I've already responded to your reasoning, Majiffy. So what you are saying is completely false.
In post 2251, Elyse wrote:That's lynchworthy?
I correctly read two players so that means I'm scum? Dafuq? Because I would definitely try not to get a townie easily mislynched in a nightless game.
Bolded: Pretty much the definition of tying yourself with another player's flip.
Read: "When Amrun flips town I'm obvtown!"In post 1987, Elyse wrote:Hello double standard.In post 1958, Wisdom wrote:Dunno about taurus, but this looks to me like the scumteam is NS/Amrun/Elyse, Elyse did that on purpose, and Amrun used that to townread her.
It's fine when you townread me about it but when someone else does, I'm scum faking it and my partner is using it to townread me?
Hey isn't this the same defense you just tried to use for yourself? Hmm. Wonder what they would call that when you use the same defense on yourself as you do for a flipped townie...In post 1987, Elyse wrote:SHE DOESN'T MAKE SENSE AS ANYONE'S SCUM TEAMMATE. You seem to be trying to push her lynch saying she could be scum with me, but hello, there are FOUR people on the scumteam and you only have three. Who's the fourth? Answer: no one.
I also got a chuckle out of this, considering it completely betrays your defense from earlier.In post 1987, Elyse wrote:I don't have a list of reads ready for you for every possible scenario.
More lulz like the above.In post 1987, Elyse wrote:I'm not going to waste my time trying to find a townread scummy when my initial scumteam isn't even wrong yet. You're accusing me of not doing work I didn't need to do. How is that scummy at all?
More tying.In post 1993, Elyse wrote:Amrun - Didn't know how many scum there were, doesn't make sense with anyone as scum (besides me I guess but I know I'm town)
Far too confident an argument to take for someone who doesn't know the alignment of the person they're defending. This is basically a scum claim.In post 1993, Elyse wrote:And why are you scared I will use Amrun's flip against you? She's flipping scum, right?
Wait didn't you just say that Amrun works as your teammate?In post 2011, Elyse wrote:You're fucking stupid if you think Amrun is scum with me and qwints.
Tying Amrun/Coug together, which is essentially linking herself to Coug. Thus, tying yourself to two flipped townies.In post 2018, Elyse wrote:Neither. I'm on my phone. But your last few posts are a prime example as well as the ones after Coug's flip.
No it's not. At all. It's just the order of the sentence.Majiffy wrote:Bolded: Pretty much the definition of tying yourself with another player's flip.
What? How do you get that at all? Wisdom said I was scum with Amrun and I faked what I said to get her to townread me. Should my response be "Yeah, maybe"? NO.Majiffy wrote:Read: "When Amrun flips town I'm obvtown!"In post 1987, Elyse wrote:Hello double standard.In post 1958, Wisdom wrote:Dunno about taurus, but this looks to me like the scumteam is NS/Amrun/Elyse, Elyse did that on purpose, and Amrun used that to townread her.
It's fine when you townread me about it but when someone else does, I'm scum faking it and my partner is using it to townread me?
Hmmm...considering Amrun was TOWN, doesn't that, I dunno, make sense?Majiffy wrote:Hey isn't this the same defense you just tried to use for yourself? Hmm. Wonder what they would call that when you use the same defense on yourself as you do for a flipped townie...In post 1987, Elyse wrote:SHE DOESN'T MAKE SENSE AS ANYONE'S SCUM TEAMMATE. You seem to be trying to push her lynch saying she could be scum with me, but hello, there are FOUR people on the scumteam and you only have three. Who's the fourth? Answer: no one.
Yes but I'm only asking you one scenario and it directly affects today's lynch. And why didn't you say something like this earlier? Instead, you made it seem like you had a plan for when I flipped town. That's scummy. You didn't play it off like I did.Majiffy wrote:I also got a chuckle out of this, considering it completely betrays your defense from earlier.In post 1987, Elyse wrote:I don't have a list of reads ready for you for every possible scenario.
Grim never prompted me before that. I would have no problem if he asked me specifically for my scumteam if a scumread flipped town, but he just said "You're scummy for not looking at every option." This case is completely different. I'm not calling you scummy for not considering your scumreads wrong, I'm calling you scummy for not being able to come up with a scumteam for when I flip town.Majiffy wrote:More lulz like the above.In post 1987, Elyse wrote:I'm not going to waste my time trying to find a townread scummy when my initial scumteam isn't even wrong yet. You're accusing me of not doing work I didn't need to do. How is that scummy at all?
It's true. Everyone said Amrun didn't make sense with anyone as scum but me. How am I scum for saying that?Majiffy wrote:Here, have more.
More tying.In post 1993, Elyse wrote:Amrun - Didn't know how many scum there were, doesn't make sense with anyone as scum (besides me I guess but I know I'm town)
Oh, like confident enough to challenge a team when there wasn't even a consensus reached? You out of ANYONE should know confidence isn't a scumtell. Come on now.Majiffy wrote:Far too confident an argument to take for someone who doesn't know the alignment of the person they're defending. This is basically a scum claim.In post 1993, Elyse wrote:And why are you scared I will use Amrun's flip against you? She's flipping scum, right?
You missed the QWINTS part.Majiffy wrote:Wait didn't you just say that Amrun works as your teammate?In post 2011, Elyse wrote:You're fucking stupid if you think Amrun is scum with me and qwints.
Wtf is this? First, I'm not tying Amrun and Coug together. I was pointing out where Grim flip flopped on people. Second, even if I was, I'm not linking myself to Coug. This is bullshit.Majiffy wrote:Tying Amrun/Coug together, which is essentially linking herself to Coug. Thus, tying yourself to two flipped townies.In post 2018, Elyse wrote:Neither. I'm on my phone. But your last few posts are a prime example as well as the ones after Coug's flip.
Because it was already self-evident to the 4 people on your wagon. Why should I need to post a full case when the reasons you're scum are self-evident?In post 2297, Elyse wrote:Why did it have to take so much pushing and prodding to get this out of you?
That'd be easy to swallow if all the evidence didn't point to the contrary.In post 2297, Elyse wrote: No it's not. At all. It's just the order of the sentence.
No, your response should be "I'm not scum", not "Oh so I'm scum because x is scum townreading me for y?"In post 2297, Elyse wrote: What? How do you get that at all? Wisdom said I was scum with Amrun and I faked what I said to get her to townread me. Should my response be "Yeah, maybe"? NO.
Yes, it makes sense that you're using a defense you used on a townie to defend yourself.In post 2297, Elyse wrote:Hmmm...considering Amrun was TOWN, doesn't that, I dunno, make sense?
I do have a plan. Lynching other scum reads.In post 2297, Elyse wrote: Yes but I'm only asking you one scenario and it directly affects today's lynch. And why didn't you say something like this earlier? Instead, you made it seem like you had a plan for when I flipped town. That's scummy. You didn't play it off like I did.
Why is it scummy that I go after one scum at a time instead of trying to link associative after associative after associative on unflipped players? Because the latter is a highly ineffective strategy.In post 2297, Elyse wrote: Grim never prompted me before that. I would have no problem if he asked me specifically for my scumteam if a scumread flipped town, but he just said "You're scummy for not looking at every option." This case is completely different. I'm not calling you scummy for not considering your scumreads wrong, I'm calling you scummy for not being able to come up with a scumteam for when I flip town.
Because from your perspective, you aren't scum. Ergo Amrun doesn't make sense with anyone, not anyone (except maybe me I guess lol hehe look how town I am for admitting I might be scum! I'm gonna look soooo town when she flips town!)In post 2297, Elyse wrote:It's true. Everyone said Amrun didn't make sense with anyone as scum but me. How am I scum for saying that?
There isn't even a shred of an analogy between those two, I'll accept this as an admission of guilt.In post 2297, Elyse wrote:Oh, like confident enough to challenge a team when there wasn't even a consensus reached? You out of ANYONE should know confidence isn't a scumtell. Come on now.
So why did you include yourself, then?In post 2297, Elyse wrote:You missed the QWINTS part.
First, yes you are. By using Coug's flip as an example of reference in regard to Amrun's future flip.In post 2297, Elyse wrote: Wtf is this? First, I'm not tying Amrun and Coug together. I was pointing out where Grim flip flopped on people. Second, even if I was, I'm not linking myself to Coug. This is bullshit.