Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:40 pm
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 2245, Elscouta wrote:So this is a 1v1 Tierce vs PeregrineV?
I don't know. On one side, i tend to give the benefit to the player forcing the 1v1, and it justifies a bit that PV pushed a forced case on Tierce yesterday. On the other hand:
- do you really keep a tracker-guilty under the belt when you have a reasonable chance of getting NK'ed, and when 2 scums are already down?
- 2 Trackers, 1 Weak Doc and 1 Super VigCop of Doom?
Unvote while I ponder.
Doesn't matter. Scum would know better and that doesn't match your proposed rationale for unclaiming Jailkeeper.In post 2271, Tierce wrote:Which shos had said he wasn't, so...?
I've already said that I don't much care about this Today. Peregrine goes first becauseIn post 2279, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:If you're town, Tierce, there's a 3-man scum team out there to catch with connections between them. So catch that scum team.
Tierce wants you to believe there's 5 scum and it's lylo after she had a guilty on her. How is that derp and not scum?In post 2284, ActionDan wrote:I don't believe there's 5 scum if peregrine is scum. If he's town I don't think there's 5 either. People thinking there is 5 scum seem kinda derpy to me
Like thisIn post 2279, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Doesn't matter. Scum would know better and that doesn't match your proposed rationale for unclaiming Jailkeeper.In post 2271, Tierce wrote:Which shos had said he wasn't, so...?
If you're town, Tierce, there's a 3-man scum team out there to catch with connections between them. So catch that scum team.
I'm not expressing a belief in a 5-man scum team there. I'm trying to see where Tierce takes that logic.In post 2286, ActionDan wrote:Like thisIn post 2279, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Doesn't matter. Scum would know better and that doesn't match your proposed rationale for unclaiming Jailkeeper.In post 2271, Tierce wrote:Which shos had said he wasn't, so...?
If you're town, Tierce, there's a 3-man scum team out there to catch with connections between them. So catch that scum team.
I'm willing to answer everything. I'm going to keep my cool right now and avoid the obvious posting that I so desperately want to do.In post 2287, ActionDan wrote:There's some stuff directed at you earlier. I haven't read it but some people say it's incriminating.
There was no first guilty.In post 2263, Elscouta wrote:He is scum because it is the second guily that he gets, and he never spoke of the first.
Yes, quite.In post 2263, Elscouta wrote:ABR claimed Even Night Cop on day 2 when JacobSavage was a claimed bodyguard.
PV is supposed to have tracked JacobSavage to MafiaSSK day 2, which would be at least a very strange target.
But, choosing bad targets as town happens. You can argue the whys, but there was, at that point, no reason to out myself when I had no usable results.In post 1489, Elscouta wrote:There is scum in ABR or Jacob, possibly both.
Tierce was busy bussing day3. Jacob was bussing. Since we were lynching scum, what's there to say?In post 2263, Elscouta wrote:He doesn't speak of it. He doesn't even pretend to be interested in what JacobSavage did, when asking "who did you target, JS" would have been totally fine on day3.
At what point was Jacob confirmed scum TO YOU?In post 2263, Elscouta wrote:He waits until day 4 when JS is confirmed scum to hop on the bandwagon.
She's not taking it anywhere. She's scum.In post 2288, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I'm not expressing a belief in a 5-man scum team there. I'm trying to see where Tierce takes that logic.In post 2286, ActionDan wrote:Like thisIn post 2279, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Doesn't matter. Scum would know better and that doesn't match your proposed rationale for unclaiming Jailkeeper.In post 2271, Tierce wrote:Which shos had said he wasn't, so...?
If you're town, Tierce, there's a 3-man scum team out there to catch with connections between them. So catch that scum team.
This one?In post 2294, ActionDan wrote:Peregrine after the comment "i want to believe Jacob" i made, what were you feeling in your next post?
This was my attempt to make scum not connect 1764 with a results-oriented counterclaim. I was hoping to squeeze out at least one more result.In post 1790, PeregrineV wrote:That was actually the fastest wagon/lynch I've seen recently.In post 1789, ActionDan wrote::/ i really want to believe him