Page 92 of 132
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:38 am
by Eleven
I mean either way we've got a scumbag and stuff but like let's be real eaglekit are scum like so yeah
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:38 am
by Eleven
oh is your sanity guaranteed btw?????
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:40 am
by EagleKit
no
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:40 am
by Gammagooey
also just wanna point out that tunnelling a person for day 1 and then investigating them so you can tunnel the exact same amount and not claim until you're about to be lynched is a very silly thing that didn't happen.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:41 am
by Eleven
:/ sorry i did get help a lot w/ actiondan in my defense?
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:42 am
by EagleKit
@ gamma, again we still got her to l-1 and were definitely going to survive long enough to investigate again after she flipped scum. im not going to apologize for an approach that should have been succrssful.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:45 am
by EagleKit
blame mala for completely noshowing d1 and a combination of me being legitimately busy and avoiding townreads
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:47 am
by Eleven
In post 1877, EagleKit wrote:@Mollie: what exactly put us back to scum read? Was it me agreeing with Desperado about his scum read on you?
Also you do have a good point about CD. Something feels off about him over the last two games I played with him. I need to pinpoint that more than gut at this point.
desperado did mala know you guys investigated her? b/c her posts are super weird "you do have a good point" to someone who's confirmed scum to her is pretty watarrific.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:48 am
by EagleKit
mala knows if she checked our pms, otherwise i cant say
we still havent synched up yet.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:49 am
by Eleven
what
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:51 am
by EagleKit
we havent been online at the same time sincr the game started.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:54 am
by Eleven
"to: Malakittens,
Hey, we got a guilty on MOLLIE LOL KNEW IT. How do you want to play it? I'm trying to slow roll it"
like weren't you afraid she might out the guilty or something when she saw it. this is hilariously implausible. anyway i'm off for a bit. can't wait for everyone to CHECK IN.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:59 am
by EagleKit
no? she was totally non-existent d1 and i expected that to continue. i also think she is smart enough to deduce my approach.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:04 am
by Eleven
huh AP has used a scum hider before, strange.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:07 am
by Eleven
desp can you please elaborate on why your flavor isn't complete bullshit
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:10 am
by Eleven
-kittymo
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:25 am
by Sir Waffles Wafflington
Hmm. Right now I think:
1) They're more likely to be lying than to be telling the truth.
2) It's better play to wait one more night before lynching a claimed cop.
The question is which outweighs the other.
Uh...you asked the mod, "Are we a sane cop?" and they refused to answer you? Or it's explicitly stated in your PM that your sanity is unknown?
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:26 am
by EagleKit
not beyond what i've already said
pedit: the former
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:27 am
by EagleKit
and we cant investigate tonight so your math is off
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:28 am
by Ythan
One second while I make sure I'm not about to hammer you.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:29 am
by Ythan
OH I CAN
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:31 am
by Ythan
EagleKit clarify your flavor in the next two minutes.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:31 am
by Untrod Tripod
so how about we lynch mollie tomorrow if they're not lying, yeah?
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:32 am
by Ythan
Obviously.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:36 am
by Sir Waffles Wafflington
BUT MAYBE THEY'RE NOT A SANE COP!!!111!!!!11
When exactly did you ask the mods if you were a sane cop? And what you're saying is that you were not going to claim your guilty result until
day four
?