Mafiascum.net

In post 2271, Scioness Sajj wrote:Nancy, I think it was actually wheme that unvoted first.
where did you get that i'm convinced he isn't a player because he is a villian?

So, you’re convinced that Jareth isn’t a player because he is the villain in Labrynth, so I find that highly unlikely. Hmmm . . .

No, what I meant is that I think it’s highly unlikely that Jareth isn’t a player because he’s a villian in Labrynth. I didn’t mean that you think that. I’m asking you why you don’t think he’s a player, basically.

In post 2274, Scioness Sajj wrote:sounds incriminating

So, why did you drop out of the underground chat?

In post 2272, Reality Check wrote:because the one in a dozen games where I play really well or learn a lot is worth the 9-10 games of torture and 1-2 games of being unable to care

Lol, I can totally relate.

In post 2273, Reality Check wrote:

In post 2271, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 2268, Reality Check wrote:iirc Sajj kind of dropped out of the conversation while worst and I were hashing our feelings about mafia and how much we (mainly I) hate it

and what does it tell you?

that you didn't care at the time

Yeah and since all 3 of you were informed about your not being able to either be able to vote or post, so that is definitely odd considering the circumstances.

tbf none of us cared

but worst is a cool person in general so I talked to him anyways

In post 2275, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 2271, Scioness Sajj wrote:Nancy, I think it was actually wheme that unvoted first.
where did you get that i'm convinced he isn't a player because he is a villian?

So, you’re convinced that Jareth isn’t a player because he is the villain in Labrynth, so I find that highly unlikely. Hmmm . . .

No, what I meant is that I think it’s highly unlikely that Jareth isn’t a player because he’s a villian in Labrynth. I didn’t mean that you think that. I’m asking you why you don’t think he’s a player, basically.

it looks like a daily event. it's been negative - neutral - negative, if tomorrow's even has neutralish utility then it's a pattern. After underground I expected Anka or TW to die. From the underground message we received it looked like we were there only till the night. If it was mafia doing I'd expect them to know that and kill one of them.

In post 2276, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 2274, Scioness Sajj wrote:sounds incriminating

So, why did you drop out of the underground chat?

i said most of the things i wanted to say at the beginning then Anka started talking about some life-related stuff and i checked out i guess.

In post 2280, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 2275, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 2271, Scioness Sajj wrote:Nancy, I think it was actually wheme that unvoted first.
where did you get that i'm convinced he isn't a player because he is a villian?

So, you’re convinced that Jareth isn’t a player because he is the villain in Labrynth, so I find that highly unlikely. Hmmm . . .

No, what I meant is that I think it’s highly unlikely that Jareth isn’t a player because he’s a villian in Labrynth. I didn’t mean that you think that. I’m asking you why you don’t think he’s a player, basically.

it looks like a daily event. it's been negative - neutral - negative, if tomorrow's even has neutralish utility then it's a pattern. After underground I expected Anka or TW to die. From the underground message we received it looked like we were there only till the night. If it was mafia doing I'd expect them to know that and kill one of them.

When the top 3 posters are unable to post or vote and results in a no lynch, I don’t view that as neutral. I think Jareth gave us the masquerade ball, to throw us off the track - ie. underground.

The fact as backed up by all the flips, is that all roles are both flavour based and totally AI, which majes it extemely unlikely that Jareth isn’t scum. Outside chance of a 3P but definitely anti-town.

Lol, why is it saying d2, it’s d3 now.

I think you are confusing something?

taking people away (underground)- negative
neighbourhoods (ball)- neutral
being loved (today)- negative

Of what track was the ball supposed to throw us? Creature lynch? eh, I guess that's possible but if Underground even was picked by the player to happen d1 i'd say that's a waste.

roles are flavor based yes, totally AI? well, we will see.

In post 2272, Reality Check wrote:because the one in a dozen games where I play really well or learn a lot is worth the 9-10 games of torture and 1-2 games of being unable to care

I think you’d make a fine addition to the Normandy full time.

you will get the vc with the eod post

ma and wheme on chick
aa9 on me
rest on aa9

My flip can speak for me now. Cant deal with stupid heads

Mastina gotta to be scum. If he is town, he knows that this is me as town. So Reality check should die next

AA9

for the fucking 20th time

mastina hasn't posted in the thread in the past

why not?

she's barely even been keeping up because of RL things

she hasn't had updated reads since early-mid day one

she offers her opinion on some of the stuff I've been posting in the hydra PT, but it's not extensive by any means

In post 2287, ArcAngel9 wrote:My flip can speak for me now. Cant deal with stupid heads

Mastina gotta to be scum. If he is town, he knows that this is me as town. So Reality check should die next

In post 2288, Reality Check wrote:AA9

for the fucking 20th time

mastina hasn't posted in the thread in the past

MONTH

Reality spewed town after Angel flip.

In post 2284, Scioness Sajj wrote:I think you are confusing something?

taking people away (underground)- negative
neighbourhoods (ball)- neutral
being loved (today)- negative

Of what track was the ball supposed to throw us? Creature lynch? eh, I guess that's possible but if Underground even was picked by the player to happen d1 i'd say that's a waste.

roles are flavor based yes, totally AI? well, we will see.

What exactly do you think I’m confusing here?

Yes the ball is neutral but it’s WIFOM to makes us not suspicious of underground incident.

No, we’ve already seen. Name me one flip so far that has not been AI. You can’t.

the ball is net-positive

neighborhoods are pro-town with competent town

Nancy please

In post 2282, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:When the top 3 posters are unable to post or vote and results in a no lynch, I don’t view that as neutral.

never wrote that underground was neutral. that's what i think you were confusing

the rest will have to wait because i'm not pulling out nico

In post 2225, Commander Shepard wrote:Can we like end this day already please?

Do you think we might possibly get another surprise from Jareth because I can’t understand why this day hasn’t ended yet, since we already hammered last night.

In post 2293, Reality Check wrote:the ball is net-positive

neighborhoods are pro-town with competent town

That is true but if Jareth is a player and based on all of the flips far being flavour based, I still think it’s more than likey WIFOM.

I suppose they could still possibly a 3P though but the underground, the creepy video RC posted, AI flavour, make it highly unlikely they’re town.

In post 2295, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 2282, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:When the top 3 posters are unable to post or vote and results in a no lynch, I don’t view that as neutral.

never wrote that underground was neutral. that's what i think you were confusing

the rest will have to wait because i'm not pulling out nico

I think what we have is a failure to comminicate. XD. I never said you did. You said that the ball was neutral and the underground and the video were negative. Reality is right that the ball is actually positive than neutral. I certainly found it very helpful but than I kind of lucked out having had Random as my partner. I had a PT with a wolf in a past game and it was anything but enjoyable.

Like, it 110% would not be positive if I got a hood with Angel. I would have just boycotted that altogether in that case.

omfg sorry i forgot this