Page 92 of 323
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:59 pm
by OkaPoka
Dance is not awful because any ability that denies scum the nk is not awful.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:00 pm
by OkaPoka
Quiz is also not "awful"
It's a conditional power that should be reserved for post 1of4
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:00 pm
by RadiantCowbells
dance games are weighted to be harder than mountainous and that's with town having some influence over the pairings.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:00 pm
by RadiantCowbells
we are never using quiz.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:01 pm
by RadiantCowbells
unless like
we're in 6 way with 1 scum and it's free
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:02 pm
by OkaPoka
well that's why its a conditional power
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:02 pm
by Titus
In post 2274, RadiantCowbells wrote: In post 2272, Titus wrote: In post 2259, RadiantCowbells wrote:okapoka must also be scum because he tmid the knowledge that tmck was fake
so we have guilties on okapoka and tmck
gg
Do you feel Oka's plan is bad? Where's the flaw?
i want to win the game with the second coalition and if we're doing first set of people then leftovers you can nearly guarantee that we won't end up with a 3/0 setup
I think we should realistically divide the camps based on internal politics in the thread.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:02 pm
by OkaPoka
I would like everyone to sign onto the idea that both coalition pools must be with completely separate people barring the repicker
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:03 pm
by RadiantCowbells
it's unfortunate that there's only two good powers that kill an odd number of people
I would like everyone to sign onto the idea that both coalition pools must be with completely separate people barring the repicker
i do not sign on.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:03 pm
by OkaPoka
In post 2283, RadiantCowbells wrote:it's unfortunate that there's only two good powers that kill an odd number of people
I would like everyone to sign onto the idea that both coalition pools must be with completely separate people barring the repicker
i do not sign on.
What's wrong with my plan?
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:04 pm
by Titus
In post 2282, OkaPoka wrote:I would like everyone to sign onto the idea that both coalition pools must be with completely separate people barring the repicker
I think the repicker should not be duplicated as we get more info. Technically, RC cced.
Yes, I sign on.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:05 pm
by OkaPoka
Repicker would be conf town by end of this phase thus if they are duplicated its okay because it is preferable to PoE from a pool of 4 than 5.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:05 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 2286, OkaPoka wrote:Repicker would be conf town by end of this phase thus if they are duplicated its okay because it is preferable to PoE from a pool of 4 than 5.
where the fuck are you getting pool of 4 from
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:06 pm
by OkaPoka
RC, can I have confirmation that you are/are not the repicker? If that's a real cc then the game plan shifts.
@nancefloor read some of my earlier posts
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:06 pm
by Titus
In post 2286, OkaPoka wrote:Repicker would be conf town by end of this phase thus if they are duplicated its okay because it is preferable to PoE from a pool of 4 than 5.
The role would be conftown. Both RC and tmck would claim they repicked.
I think we should do 4 4 left overs
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:06 pm
by 0verki11
@mod
With treestump is the following true
1. Their alignment is flipped
2. They can not be attacked
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:07 pm
by NanceFloor
In post 2288, OkaPoka wrote:RC, can I have confirmation that you are/are not the repicker? If that's a real cc then the game plan shifts.
@nancefloor read some of my earlier posts
I have read them
I'm not sure you understand how coalition works
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:07 pm
by RadiantCowbells
because you can 100% guarantee that we won't win off of the coalition if we're doing it like that
and if mbaki is going to prevent my being prevented i either need to seriously invest into this game and be willing to toxic it up to get myself prevented and murder him or accept that i'm going to be nightkilled and he's going to win
i'd rather just win the game with minimal interplayer bloodshed today with coalition.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:08 pm
by OkaPoka
Theory of Coalition 4-pool
Assuming nobody ccs tmck, then tmck is conf town
Coalition is a pool of 5, but tmck being conf town locks it to 4 people left
If we do not win, then we know there is at least one scum in this "pool" for coalition.
Second coalition is the same, we should pick a different 4 + tmck.
Again if we do not win, we know there is at least one scum in this "pool"
That's why of this pool of 4, one must be scum.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:08 pm
by RadiantCowbells
ITS A POOL OF 9 PEOPLE OKAPOKA
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:09 pm
by NanceFloor
jesus fucking christ
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:09 pm
by OkaPoka
In post 2292, RadiantCowbells wrote:because you can 100% guarantee that we won't win off of the coalition if we're doing it like that
and if mbaki is going to prevent my being prevented i either need to seriously invest into this game and be willing to toxic it up to get myself prevented and murder him or accept that i'm going to be nightkilled and he's going to win
i'd rather just win the game with minimal interplayer bloodshed today with coalition.
and in the scenario you propose, we don't win?
Then we will have a blob of pools where either one must be scum in both pools or we have two different scums in each pool and now we can't guarantee of PoE.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:09 pm
by RadiantCowbells
so basically
you either let me do my thing and win without having to deal with you all being bad
or you force me to make this game a bloody wasteland, which I don't want to do.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:09 pm
by OkaPoka
No it's two separate pools of 4?
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:10 pm
by 0verki11
also 1 in 4 is trash because we dont gain info from it if scum selects 1 obv scum and another not as open scum particulary if we always lynch the obv scum.
I probably explained that trash but whatever.