Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:04 pm
ank is gonna troll now.
Page 92 of 199
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:06 pm
ank doesnt strike me as the trolling type
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:06 pm
trolling doesn't require a type
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:08 pm
In post 2272, Firebringer wrote:Ankamius ur still not forgiven for skipping on our date.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:08 pm
it took an embarrassingly long time to make that postable on my phone
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:10 pm
Do u use AndroidIn post 2279, Ankamius wrote:it took an embarrassingly long time to make that postable on my phone
Android is shitty when it comes to posting images
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:10 pm
Yes android
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:12 pm
How did u do it
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:13 pm
I downloaded it and reuploaded it to imgur
then went to the image itself and copied the link
then went to the image itself and copied the link
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:16 pm
I have tried that but the imgur link seems to fail for me
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:17 pm
Do you have the link to the post or the picture
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:30 pm
I can avoid that term if Firebringer objects to it. I think Oka/gamma is a good lynch because Oka has a better than 3/16ths chance to flip scum and Gamma Emerald has a better than 3/16ths chance to flip scum each.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:49 pm
It was a while ago I tried itIn post 2285, Ankamius wrote:Do you have the link to the post or the picture
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:51 pm
This is just platitudes, you can't just say someone is >rand scum, you needs reasons. That's Fire's problem as I see it, "scum equity" isn't a reasonIn post 2286, popsofctown wrote:I can avoid that term if Firebringer objects to it. I think Oka/gamma is a good lynch because Oka has a better than 3/16ths chance to flip scum and Gamma Emerald has a better than 3/16ths chance to flip scum each.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:02 pm
Wow those pages were boring
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:04 pm
I've given reasons for scumreading each of you in past posts there's not a requirement that you quote your own iso every time you want to use the word "scum equity". You're just being obtuse
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:32 pm
I don't understand your scumreads on gamma or oka. I read through your ISO (skimmed trying to find interactions you had with them both), i found joke interaction (mostly sarcasm), but i didn't find much of reasons they were scum instead instances of things you didn't like.
What do you think is scummy about them that I am not getting?
What do you think is scummy about them that I am not getting?
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:33 pm
stop playing like how i remember you playing when we were scum teammates. It makes me want to not townread you.In post 2289, Cephrir wrote:Wow those pages were boring
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:52 pm
VOTE: Ceph/DV
I'm going to park my vote here.
I'm going to park my vote here.
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:18 pm
I'll just go have a waltz outside in the pale moonlight with my lovely gentleman caller if no one else at this ball is interested. Hmph!In post 2292, Firebringer wrote:stop playing like how i remember you playing when we were scum teammates. It makes me want to not townread you.In post 2289, Cephrir wrote:Wow those pages were boring
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:32 pm
By “park” do you mean that you are intending to keep it here for some time or is it more along the lines of “put my vote here”?
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:53 pm
I'm putting my vote here until I feel like there's a better vote.In post 2295, DeasVail wrote:By “park” do you mean that you are intending to keep it here for some time or is it more along the lines of “put my vote here”?
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 4:00 pm
This for Gamma. That one post bugs me a lot.In post 1161, popsofctown wrote:This deserves to be QFTed by at least one person that's not omgussing.In post 1068, Alisae wrote:thisIn post 1065, Gamma Emerald wrote:WhateverIn post 1052, Alisae wrote:YesIn post 1051, Gamma Emerald wrote:THAT DOESN'T EXPLAIN ANYTHING DIPSHITIn post 1024, Alisae wrote:because ur fakeIn post 994, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay that's a start: how am I a liar through that post?
You haven't acknowledged a single post countering your shitty single-pairing plan so obviously no rational thought occurs in that coconut shell of a skull
is a scummy post
Criticizing someone for inadequacies in setup-break theory is really scummy, because scum can solve a setupbreak solution independent of alignment and as scum it feels really good to be right about something when most of the time you are wrong (lying). It's a bad look that that's where GE went to pick on something. Especially when the final criticism was dumb, Alisae obviously read the other posts where the setup break counterstrategies were laid out later in her read up and didn't further clog up the thread by requoting it
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
Oka is scummy for goofing instead of producing content, then producing content for survivalism, which in turn suggests the original goofing was perhaps survivalism (people can't read you if you don't post content)
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 4:01 pm
Do make lots of post with unclarity about whether I dislike something or think it's scummy? They are in fact different things. I like Cephrir for instance
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2019 4:43 pm