Mafiascum.net

Votecount 3.04

Dunnstral (3)

- Blair(Freddietheladie), Nauci, Tuxedo Mask,

No Lynch (1)

- Dunnstral (Lilith2013),

Not Voting (3) -

Aloratom (Votato) Battle Mage (Formerfish),

With 6 players alive it takes 4 votes to lynch.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2020-06-11 08:15:00)

Elmo's here! Quick lynch Dunnstral so the day can end.

Why are you in such a hurry to lynch me Tux?

Cause the game feels pretty locked in at the moment, so why waste our time?

Best panada yet tbh

My reading comprehension is in the dumps for now, and I'm going to bed. I'll pick this up tomorrow sometime.

In post 2249, Blair wrote:Did he say I was jailed? I missed that. If he did, my apologies.

That's why 2166 = scumstral

In post 2281, Nauci wrote:scumstral

Haven't heard that one before (lie)

At least you're labeling them now.

@BM if even mass claiming would not push you into voting for scum, what would? And why not? What is the benefit of letting a demonstrated liar make it to LYLO with or without mass claim?

I'm not a 'demonstrated liar' unless you're talking about, in which case

2822

*2282

dunnstral claimed tracker with no counterclaim? and he's at -1 in lylo? is that right....

if tux aint claiming, we may as well as end the day and try again tomorrow. will leave the final decision to Aloratom.

VOTE: no lynch

Seriously, everything about today reads Dunnstral and Blair as both being scum. Nearly every post Blair makes, makes it seems like the most transparent bus ever. It actually makes me cringe to read.

HOWEVER - Tux hasn't claimed, although he has hinted at having some relevant info about the Dunnstral claim, so I don't know what to make of that.

Likewise, in theory, Nauci and Aloratom could still be scum with Dunnstral (although presumably Aloratom is town if Dunnstral is town). Aloratom is the easiest townread really.

A massclaim would have busted this game open. The only reason I'm not hammering Dunnstral is because it's a reckless play and as I'm not 100% sure he's scum, there is no need to. We need to find 2 scum anyway, so no merit whatsoever in holding back on claims today.

UNVOTE:

Aloratom - please come in here, talk some sense and help a brother out.

In post 2288, Battle Mage wrote:dunnstral claimed tracker with no counterclaim? and he's at -1 in lylo? is that right....

Reducing this situation down to that?

Found the partner. Game solved.

In post 2290, Battle Mage wrote:Seriously, everything about today reads Dunnstral and Blair as both being scum. Nearly every post Blair makes, makes it seems like the most transparent bus ever. It actually makes me cringe to read.

HOWEVER - Tux hasn't claimed, although he has hinted at having some relevant info about the Dunnstral claim, so I don't know what to make of that.

Likewise, in theory, Nauci and Aloratom could still be scum with Dunnstral (although presumably Aloratom is town if Dunnstral is town). Aloratom is the easiest townread really.

A massclaim would have busted this game open. The only reason I'm not hammering Dunnstral is because it's a reckless play and as I'm not 100% sure he's scum, there is no need to. We need to find 2 scum anyway, so no merit whatsoever in holding back on claims today.

UNVOTE:

Aloratom - please come in here, talk some sense and help a brother out.

He's "not 100% sure" Dunnstral is scum. Even though Dunnstral is scum in all three of the scenarios he gave in this very post. (1: Dunnstral & Blair are cross-bussing 2: Tux has a claim that incriminates Dunnstral 3: Nauci or Aloratom are scum with Dunnstral)

This is transparent scum setting himself up for all options after his partner flips.

I had two scumreads right out the gate when I joined this game. Glad one of them was right.

Sorry, Gibus.

In post 2291, Blair wrote:

In post 2288, Battle Mage wrote:dunnstral claimed tracker with no counterclaim? and he's at -1 in lylo? is that right....

Reducing this situation down to that?

Found the partner. Game solved.

Blair, you've been trying to subtly set me up as tomorrow's mislynch for like 4 pages now, and I've just read it and ignored it because that's the pro-town play. Just because my post count is lower, doesn't mean I'm always a total idiot who can't see through BS.

If I've got the situation wrong, do smarten me up though!

Dunnstral has the most convenient fake claim imaginable, crafted entirely from information scum would have already had. He also speculated openly about night actions that he would have already known were impossible according to the details of his own claim.

That's the part you forgot.

Blair, I'm not even going to get into a debate with you over this. If you're town, you've obviously completely gone off the rails, but it's far more likely you're scum trying to misconstrue everything I say (and in fact, I've said very little) into making me sound scummy because you know you need a mislynch tomorrow to justify bussing your partner today.

I'm just happy it's on record that I did realise you were scum several pages ago, despite the lack of anyone doing anything I suggested.

In post 2294, Battle Mage wrote:Blair, you've been trying to subtly set me up as tomorrow's mislynch for like 4 pages now

Notice here how he knows there will be a "tomorrow" after Dunnstral's lynch.

Turns out he was sure about Dunnstral after all. Who knew?

In post 2295, Blair wrote:Dunnstral has the most convenient fake claim imaginable, crafted entirely from information scum would have already had. He also speculated openly about night actions that he would have already known were impossible according to the details of his own claim.

That's the part you forgot.

Sounds like you're saying his claim is weak and COULD be made up, and he said something dumb about night actions? Doesn't say to me 100% confirmed scum, so you'll forgive me if I don't risk throwing the game away for that.

In post 2296, Battle Mage wrote:because you know you need a mislynch tomorrow to justify bussing your partner today.

Here you are again knowing Dunnstral is scum.

Yet you keep claiming you're undecided.

Go ahead. Help me "bus my partner." We can deal with the next step after.