Mafiascum.net

In post 1944, Gypyx wrote:Oh god i promised myself to look at this game and now it's midnight

Please pressure me to post tommorow if i still manage to procrastinate

VOTE: Gypyx

its scummy to write 5 lines of thought that don't amount to anything with no analysis.

i think they call it IIoA?

In post 2265, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 2250, Dunnstral wrote:It doesn't have to remain static, but it feels like you've regressed instead of progressed

i don’t feel like i have personally but rather like evaluated and crafted a town block for myself

ig i didn’t refine that process in thread so it probably seems shitty s:

What is your town block?

In post 2276, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:its scummy to write 5 lines of thought that don't amount to anything with no analysis.

i think they call it IIoA?

IIoA is when you state facts without giving your opinion. Dunn gave opinions on some of the things he liked and didn't like about skitter, which is reasonable when asked for your thoughts on a player. I'm not sure what more you were looking for? I feel like you're trying to find things that are scummy because no one is being scummy, which is understandable, but it's not really getting anywhere.

One thought I had was that maybe the setup is 11:2 and scum has some cool factional powers.

lines 1,2,5 are statements of fact but he doesn't use them to conclude anything about her alignment, incentives, or frame of mind - it feels like he's trying to shade her but he doesn't commit and hedges.

lines 3/4 are just him stating he likes her defense of him but doesn't like her defense of me.

Lines 1 and 2 imply some sort of dissatisfaction/scum-leaning behavior, line 5 is a summary

Shading and hedging may be terms I would use if I knew dunn was scum, but I think it's just as likely but town who is unsure about a read

it feels like the kind of shading you do when you want somebody to die but you dont want to put your finger prints on the murder weapon.

In post 2277, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2265, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 2250, Dunnstral wrote:It doesn't have to remain static, but it feels like you've regressed instead of progressed

i don’t feel like i have personally but rather like evaluated and crafted a town block for myself

ig i didn’t refine that process in thread so it probably seems shitty s:

What is your town block?

gloria + mt + jessie + hopkirk + flea (with an asterisk)

tonally line 1/2 sounds like he is SRing her no?

In post 2278, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 2276, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:its scummy to write 5 lines of thought that don't amount to anything with no analysis.

i think they call it IIoA?

IIoA is when you state facts without giving your opinion. Dunn gave opinions on some of the things he liked and didn't like about skitter, which is reasonable when asked for your thoughts on a player. I'm not sure what more you were looking for? I feel like you're trying to find things that are scummy because no one is being scummy, which is understandable, but it's not really getting anywhere.

One thought I had was that maybe the setup is 11:2 and scum has some cool factional powers.

Such as? And how does this have anything to do with it being so difficult to find scumreads?

In post 2281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it feels like the kind of shading you do when you want somebody to die but you dont want to put your finger prints on the murder weapon.

I don’t think anything Dunn wrote is going to convince anyone to vote Skitter?

In post 2281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it feels like the kind of shading you do when you want somebody to die but you dont want to put your finger prints on the murder weapon.

That doesn't make sense with this gamestate though, since if dunn wanted skitter to die he'd have to vote there

PEdit: idk, an extra night kill is the only one I can think of that makes sense with an all VT game. Or maybe they can make scum harder to elim.

and it's difficult to find scumreads because there are fewer scum, though that doesn't totally solve the problem

In post 2281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it feels like the kind of shading you do when you want somebody to die but you dont want to put your finger prints on the murder weapon.

I hadn't mentioned skitter until I was directly asked about skitter

In post 2282, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 2277, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2265, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 2250, Dunnstral wrote:It doesn't have to remain static, but it feels like you've regressed instead of progressed

i don’t feel like i have personally but rather like evaluated and crafted a town block for myself

ig i didn’t refine that process in thread so it probably seems shitty s:

What is your town block?

gloria + mt + jessie + hopkirk + flea (with an asterisk)

Whoever’s town, please unvote this. Ydrasse is a suboptimal flip and I really don’t see how she’s scum here.

In post 2287, Dunnstral wrote:I hadn't mentioned skitter until I was directly asked about skitter

so why would you avoid mentioning somebody who is a leading candidate to be elimed?

In post 2286, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 2281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it feels like the kind of shading you do when you want somebody to die but you dont want to put your finger prints on the murder weapon.

That doesn't make sense with this gamestate though, since if dunn wanted skitter to die he'd have to vote there

PEdit: idk, an extra night kill is the only one I can think of that makes sense with an all VT game. Or maybe they can make scum harder to elim.

and it's difficult to find scumreads because there are fewer scum, though that doesn't totally solve the problem

Kanna said no midgame alignment changes but how do we know that that doesn’t apply to the dead? Right? Could I possibly be onto something with this?

In post 2286, Infinity 324 wrote:That doesn't make sense with this gamestate though, since if dunn wanted skitter to die he'd have to vote there

no he doesn't have to vote there

if skitter is leading with 3 votes, she will die by plurality anyway.

I'm not responsible for skitter having 3 votes

And I've been urging other people to place votes

I'm voting gypyx currently

In post 2290, Gloria Cleary wrote:

In post 2286, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 2281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it feels like the kind of shading you do when you want somebody to die but you dont want to put your finger prints on the murder weapon.

That doesn't make sense with this gamestate though, since if dunn wanted skitter to die he'd have to vote there

PEdit: idk, an extra night kill is the only one I can think of that makes sense with an all VT game. Or maybe they can make scum harder to elim.

and it's difficult to find scumreads because there are fewer scum, though that doesn't totally solve the problem

Kanna said no midgame alignment changes but how do we know that that doesn’t apply to the dead? Right? Could I possibly be onto something with this?

That's still a mid-game alignment change, no?

I didn't say you were responsible.

I said you choose not to take a position on her when she's a likely flip candidate hours before deadline and posting 5 lines that lean SR but explicitly doesn't say it is super shady.

In post 2290, Gloria Cleary wrote:Kanna said no midgame alignment changes but how do we know that that doesn’t apply to the dead? Right? Could I possibly be onto something with this?

What do you mean, that the dead come back as scum somehow? Hmm

I really hope ~something happens~ during n1 so we at least have something to go off of

In post 2291, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 2286, Infinity 324 wrote:That doesn't make sense with this gamestate though, since if dunn wanted skitter to die he'd have to vote there

no he doesn't have to vote there

if skitter is leading with 3 votes, she will die by plurality anyway.

So vote Gypyx and guarantee her safety?

i kinda want to kill dunn tho -_- ;;