In post 2167, Titus wrote:@Lukewarm, I'm not sure when I figured it out. I was confused and probably thinking both simultaneously until Annie quoted the mod for me. There's no way I can know the exact post when I was first told. The mod got back to me right as Annie posted.
Anyone else have any thoughts on Titus's tone in responding to me. Because imo, it looks like she forget that I am one of scum reads that she has been pushing for a long time.
I think Lukewarm is scum, which makes me a little reluctant to actually vote Spiffeh due to me not thinking they are teamed from what little I have comprehended.
In post 1979, Titus wrote:
I think it's Pooky, Lukewarm and you atm. You and Lukewarm are weaker because my reads on you two are tonal and unflipped wagon analysis.
There is no hint of the immediate doubt in my genuineness I would expect from someone seeing one of their biggest scum reads coming at them with a potentially incriminating line of questioning
I have already said that a) I thought you were scum and b) scum would push me because they had no other place to go. To demand I say that in every reply is scummy and looking for reasons to scumread me. Pooky did that and now you are too.
You're also trying to rehash a conversation that happened in real time and trying to place an unreasonable burden of pointing out to recreate the exact process of my thoughts when it's there in the thread. You're flailing looking for some gotcha moment.
I reacted to you and gave you a chance to show if you were scumhunting this game by asking you about the reactions to my claim. You sidestepped this. Then you tried to claim no one else asked me questions about my read. That's a blatant lie (Annie, SF, and Maeda all had questions) designed to turn the thread back to me.
VOTE: Lukewarm
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:06 pm
by Titus
In post 2223, Medea the Alien wrote:{fferybell, ArcAngel9}
{Titus*, Annie} *I have not done more than skim about the Luke case made about the claim and need to go re-read for content.
{Dunn, Spiff, Uwnd, Pooks}
{Rhea, Dragons}
{Luke*, Manatee} *See above note about Luke's recent content
Let's talk.
Here's mine
Ffery, SF
Annie, Dunn
Unwnd, AA9, Madea
STD, Manatee, Rhea (Null)
Spiffeh (gtmh scum)
Pooky
Lukewarm
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:07 pm
by Annie Edison
Did you just count Ffery twice
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:07 pm
by Medea the Alien
...ffery IS SF? Typo? or did you mean to have another name next to them?
In post 2284, Medea the Alien wrote:I guess the ones I'd be most interested in are your Dunn-read and your Pooky read, given where our lists diverge somewhat.
Pooky doesn't have anything really town about him and fell for the bait.
Dunnstral has been pretty vocal for him and I don't see anything in his posts that look scummy. He's also not posting wordy things in short bursts to look like he's contributing. He's straight to the point and in a game like this, I like it.
If I found omissions of names, obvious mechanical falsehods, and blatant lack of reading the setup notes scummy by default, this game would be an inverted 3-town 10-mafia game.
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:14 pm
by Titus
Well before that copy paste. LLD is not null and you can tell by how I treat her. It's LLD's confidence that stops Madea from being a higher read.
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:49 pm
by Medea the Alien
Swapping to my phone but nobody other than Titus cares to read them so the loss of fancyness afforded by mobile posting is nbd.
Yes I'm bitter.
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:50 pm
by Snarky Fishes
In post 2277, Annie Edison wrote:Ffery I don’t know. I feel like as the days gone on I’ve gotten more lost in the excessive townreads I was concerned about early.
I think unwnds right we should try to go big and see what shakes out though, I think there’s a lot less room for scum to hide that way.
This doesn't read like you're actually ready to end the game day.
In post 2293, Medea the Alien wrote:Swapping to my phone but nobody other than Titus cares to read them so the loss of fancyness afforded by mobile posting is nbd.
In post 2293, Medea the Alien wrote:Swapping to my phone but nobody other than Titus cares to read them so the loss of fancyness afforded by mobile posting is nbd.
Yes I'm bitter.
I owed the pup a real walk tonight.
A simple "yes but later" would have hurt a lot less :~(
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2021 5:06 pm
by Snarky Fishes
Your reasons don't really give me a sense of why they're in this grouping.
In post 2293, Medea the Alien wrote:Swapping to my phone but nobody other than Titus cares to read them so the loss of fancyness afforded by mobile posting is nbd.
Yes I'm bitter.
I owed the pup a real walk tonight.
A simple "yes but later" would have hurt a lot less :~(