Page 93 of 205

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:25 am
by Metal Sonic
my slot didnt even post shit...

Amrun why are you so reckless?

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:43 am
by No Brains Here
In post 2300, Metal Sonic wrote:my slot didnt even post shit...

Amrun why are you so reckless?
so what are your thoughts on the game state so far? have you read it? when you asked for a summary did you look back on what was summarised? if so what are your thoughts?

inquiring minds want to know

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:35 am
by Metal Sonic
In post 2301, No Brains Here wrote:
In post 2300, Metal Sonic wrote:my slot didnt even post shit...

Amrun why are you so reckless?
when you asked for a summary did you look back on what was summarised? if so what are your thoughts?
actually i didnt

i will read the day in depth when im really free

because nothing beats scumhunting like the actual posts

but yeah thanks for the summary toogaloo you get to be the first on my town list

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:29 am
by Titus
In post 2302, Metal Sonic wrote:
In post 2301, No Brains Here wrote:
In post 2300, Metal Sonic wrote:my slot didnt even post shit...

Amrun why are you so reckless?
when you asked for a summary did you look back on what was summarised? if so what are your thoughts?
actually i didnt

i will read the day in depth when im really free

because nothing beats scumhunting like the actual posts

but yeah thanks for the summary toogaloo you get to be the first on my town list
While Toogaloo is likely town, putting him there for solely his lists is a mistake. The big list maker in my fisrt game of 20 plus off–site was totally scum.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:53 am
by Toogeloo
I've already stated my reads today. I'm flavor speccing and gpffing off waiting for every one else to get it into gear and wrap this day up.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:57 am
by Aj The Epic
In post 2291, Sugar Cain wrote:Because, Hey

we're scum for being the 4th vote on a lynched townie. Like that tell isn't over-done as is.
Every slot on a wagon is analyzed by scum tells is some way. I personally look 3rd from the end and l-1, but it's player dependent.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:11 am
by Amrun
In post 2300, Metal Sonic wrote:my slot didnt even post shit...

Amrun why are you so reckless?
Yes, it did, and throwing down one vote isn't "reckless" by any means. Very strange reaction. Happy with my vote.

Aj, who is scum?

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:24 am
by Sugar Cain
In post 2074, Aj The Epic wrote:
In post 1719, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 1713, Amrun wrote:
In post 1712, Sugar Cain wrote:no Matt, this is scum. Amrun, didja ever read my Titus/AJ connection?
Why was leaving out AJ in particular so damning?
'cause I think buddies like to avoid mentioning each other and its a logical disconnect.
Seriously, you have four to five flaws here.

1. You're underestimating my ability to play scum
2. You're using confirmation bias on yourself because I have had you as scum all day and been very vocal about it.
3. That wasn't really a legitimate connection. I voted for JD because I thought the 5 post in a row a scum tell and OMGUS on OGML's calling flavor analysis a scum tell.
4. I've posted a very low amount since that incident and am admittedly more or less forgettable.
5. That was a terrible bus if it was one, and an even worse reaction.
1. ok? I don't see what that has to do with anything.
2. No. I'm pretty sure that if you were town and you were scumreading a player and that player was all like "oh, there HAS to be scum pushing me" but ignores one of the pushers. Titus said that she felt she was being pushed by scum but she was ignoring your push. Though I kinda fucked up 'cause there were other player scumreading her slot that she never mentioned like Bork and Amrun.
3. ok? Are you even reading here? I said I thought you were scummy 'cause I thought Titus was scummy and she was NOT calling you scum despite the theory that scum were pushing her. I mean she later (maybe a backtrack) called you scum but she wasn't scum reading you for awhile.
4. Why are you posting such a small amount?
5. So your defense is that it was too terrible of reaction to come from scum, ok.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:32 am
by Titus
You really need to stop scum via association on living players. You also constently misrep my theory. Scum was somewhere pushing me, so I investigated within that group and I still am. When Aj came back to life, I questioned him. I cannot question a lurker effectively. Those who were scumreading me and active,I questioned.

Aj, who do you townread at the moment?

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:39 am
by Aj The Epic
Thor, NBH, Sangres, OGML, Desperado, MattP, Amrun, Red Coyote

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:39 am
by Amrun
Who do you scumread?

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:48 am
by Sugar Cain
Why? For example, in mainstream mafia we thought that McQueen/Johog/Thad were all scummy together and hey they all were so I see nothing wrong with speculating who might be buddies together.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:50 am
by Amrun
Speculating, yes. Basing entire plays off of unflipped players, not so much.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:51 am
by Titus
In post 2311, Sugar Cain wrote:Why? For example, in mainstream mafia we thought that McQueen/Johog/Thad were all scummy together and hey they all were so I see nothing wrong with speculating who might be buddies together.
Getting lucky doesn't mean it was right. Associations are better done with dead scum. Yet you don't seem keen on that analysis.

You should focus on all pieces of the puzzl rather than focusing on your hunch.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:52 am
by Sugar Cain
So you think I'm basing my entire play off of Titus? lol

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:54 am
by Sugar Cain
In post 2313, Titus wrote:Getting lucky doesn't mean it was right. Associations are better done with dead scum. Yet you don't seem keen on that analysis.
Well guess what? We don't have any dead scum yet.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:55 am
by Sugar Cain
errr, we do but I don't think we can really get anything from Chess.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:56 am
by Aj The Epic
In post 2310, Amrun wrote:Who do you scumread?
Sugar Cain
Mastin
Titus
Metal Sonic

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:56 am
by Sugar Cain
or do you think one of Dan/Eli is scum due to him challenging them to hammer?

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:59 am
by Titus
In post 2315, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 2313, Titus wrote:Getting lucky doesn't mean it was right. Associations are better done with dead scum. Yet you don't seem keen on that analysis.
Well guess what? We don't have any dead scum yet.
So chesskid3 wasn't scum?

VOTE: Sugar Cain

@Aj, Common sense says i is highly unlikely Sugar and I are scum together.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:01 am
by Titus
In post 2316, Sugar Cain wrote:errr, we do but I don't think we can really get anything from Chess.
You never even looked at his ISO. You should have. It likely confirms Brains as town.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:02 am
by Sugar Cain
In post 2319, Titus wrote:@Aj, Common sense says i is highly unlikely Sugar and I are scum together.
???????

So when I flip town that means you are scum? awesome. Thank you for letting us know.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:04 am
by Sugar Cain
In post 2320, Titus wrote:
In post 2316, Sugar Cain wrote:errr, we do but I don't think we can really get anything from Chess.
You never even looked at his ISO. You should have. It likely confirms Brains as town.
What? My thinking that nothing productive will come from Chess makes you think I didn't read his ISO. What the fuck is that?

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:12 am
by Titus
In post 2322, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 2320, Titus wrote:
In post 2316, Sugar Cain wrote:errr, we do but I don't think we can really get anything from Chess.
You never even looked at his ISO. You should have. It likely confirms Brains as town.
What? My thinking that nothing productive will come from Chess makes you think I didn't read his ISO. What the fuck is that?
Common sense says someon being tunneled and the tunneler are not scum together. Somehow you interpret that as a scum claim.

Also, you should have ISOed him when he flipped scum if you're as big on associations as you say. Yet you totally forgot that. Then you say looking for associations in known scum is worthless. The play makes no sense.

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:13 am
by Titus
*Him in paragraph 2 is chesskid.