Mafiascum.net

Mollie is independently scummy and I still wanted her lynched today.

what i was saying was we almost didnt need to claim to get her lynched

In post 2291, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Hmm. Right now I think:

1) They're more likely to be lying than to be telling the truth.
2) It's better play to wait one more night before lynching a claimed cop.

The question is which outweighs the other.

In post 2277, EagleKit wrote:no

Uh...you asked the mod, "Are we a sane cop?" and they refused to answer you? Or it's explicitly stated in your PM that your sanity is unknown?

why

In post 2296, Ythan wrote:EagleKit clarify your flavor in the next two minutes.

Or I will hammer you.

So our hydra should probably have been named viva la dissonance avec waffling.

(Mina don't correct my half-assed French.)

I'm liking my earlier theory that Mollie and Eaglekit are scum together as that makes things make so much more sense to me right now. It never made sense that Mollie "didn't know" it was desperado posting and not malakittens when it was bloody obvious that it was desperado. Mollie hasn't really been trying to figure out the game, but neither has eaglekit. Desperado is not stupid enough to lie about a guilty on day two after his partner got lynched, so I like faraday's suggestion that they're the godfather cuz of flavor, though I wasn't there so I don't know about the one time mina was able to contain her giggling and win as scum?, but that does make sense. Anywho, they're probably both scum.

OH please nobody hammer!

I need to make sure that Mina still wants to hide behind who our code leaves to.

Thank you!

In post 2304, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Desperado is not stupid enough to lie about a guilty on day two after his partner got lynched,

uh how would that be stupid since he had to claim something to not get him lynched.

the only thing that points to your theory being correct is desperado is like, basically making it as easy as possible to lynch him (obviously if mollie gets lynched and flips scum he's a "cop" who has to die before endgame @ some stage which could be awk) but yeah

In post 2306, Eleven wrote:

In post 2304, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Desperado is not stupid enough to lie about a guilty on day two after his partner got lynched,

uh how would that be stupid since he had to claim something to not get him lynched.

the only thing that points to your theory being correct is desperado is like, basically making it as easy as possible to lynch him (obviously if mollie gets lynched and flips scum he's a "cop" who has to die before endgame @ some stage which could be awk) but yeah

Oh hrm. That's what I get for reading in my car in the parking lot!

Mina again:

Non-consecutive cop is a terrible, bastard role if it's insane and the sanity isn't specified in the role PM, anyway. But it still surprises me that mods would pull the you-don't-really-know-that-you're-sane card when asked--or even that it would OCCUR to someone that they should ask in this day and age. To be fair, I do feel like the kinds of questions ASMP are/aren't willing to answer are different from the ones I would.

Kittyday: this is weakened by their role being non-consecutive (I assumed it was like non-consecutive doctor which can't target the same person twice in a row, which makes me an idiot for obvious reasons ._.). I thought it couldn't hurt to lynch someone else and keep both Eagle and mollie alive for one more day, long enough for Eagle to be either killed/roleblocked or to claim/fake-claim another investigation.

I haven't reread Desperado yet to see if his play fits. It's still tempting to lynch mollie on the logic that Eagle will almost certainly wind up confirmed town or dead down the line if he's town and mollie is scum, but the reverse probably won't happen with an Eagle scum flip today. Lynching Eagle today is going for the bold play and making myself feel like less of a gullible idiot for giving a stretchy claim the time of day (although the "non-consecutive" detail is original enough to make me have second thoughts).

Hey, Desp, how did you and Malakittens decide to investigate mollie?

Tammy, I think I'm still okay with the crumb, but I can get on Skype if you have a better idea!

Probably not, just checking. I'll be around for a little bit while I write an exam, but I'll be stepping out to make copies, so if you want to talk, get on in the next hour?

In post 2308, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:or even that it would OCCUR to someone that they should ask in this day and age.

(they're lying)

In post 2310, Lost Butterfly wrote:

In post 2308, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:or even that it would OCCUR to someone that they should ask in this day and age.

(they're lying)

WHOOPSADAY

In post 2303, Ythan wrote:

In post 2296, Ythan wrote:EagleKit clarify your flavor in the next two minutes.

Or I will hammer you.

bump for eagle

If I don't have a satisfactory response when I return from a smoke break I will kill you.

preparing the Posse Party

So be it.

VOTE: EagleKit

In post 2261, EagleKit wrote:since we are basically at l-1 anyway:

we're that time mina didn't giggle when she was scum, non-consecutive cop. we investigated mollie last night; she's scum.

Hi I'm Reck posting on Grimms tablet and I don't believe this claim at all, please lynch it

you're a little late son

they already dead

In post 2079, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:I randomized the order of the surviving non-us players. I also took the most common fourteen letters of the alphabet from this graph (so everything from e to m).

e: InflatablePie
t: Axxle
a: Untrod Tripod
o: Fate
i: Ythan
n: Desperado + Malakittens (eaglekit)
s: pirate mollie
h: ChannelDelibird
r: Cheery Dog
d: Gammagooey
l: xRECKONERx + Grimmjow (Your New Gay Overlords)
c: Iecerint
u: Faraday + KittyMo (Eleven)
m: Nuwen

The second letter of the first five-letter word in our flavour name will be our targets.

So if my flavour name is "Aedey as jaysf ass," then our choice is Inflatable Pie (e), if it's "Yas ktagg a dgaagsh asf," it's Axxle (t), etc.

Reminder that due to the modified factor, the only way to be 100% sure of our target's guilt is if there's a standard NK as well as our death, and no vig has claimed either of the shots (or there are three deaths). If we're still alive tomorrow, we can talk more.

Also, I'm...um...pretty sure that the vast majority of this was completely unnecessary when scum probably weren't going to bother taking out a one-shot hider anyway, and my priorities are really not in order here. But at least I get to feel clever!

Reminder for everyone.

Given the stalling after Ythan's ultimatum, I'm feeling pretty okay about this.

etaoin shrdlu + scum?

I'm...confused. Is this just a dig at the code + calling me scum, a serious question, or an arcane joke that's flying over my head? (Obviously, there is at least one five-letter word in my flavour name.)

Your sequence of letters is just really close to but not quite the same as a well known one. With cum tacked on the end.