If anything, this should be me watching "Mad chkflip" self-destruct.
I also feel his phony distress is manufactured.
In post 2261, Lavender wrote:Ah you're right NPOM, I read that incorrectly, well who's the scum on your wagon?
And uh, before chkflip explodes once more, just gonna VOTE: Looker ( ⚆ _ ⚆ )
Are they screaming at you in the scum PT? "I'm going to vote Looker sO ChKfLiP IsN't aNgRy" lmao Don't make it too easy
In post 2294, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Galron
*Was one of the first to vote IKS. "Out of the gate scummy"
*Criticized Lookers read list early day 1.
*Said he wasn't on NPOM due to rude. Then voted NPOM.
TR: a2, Ice, piss, npom, chk
Votes: IKS, Walter, NPOM, Walter
My Read: Solid Town. Not making rash judgements.
I don't make D1 read lists - are you sure he criticized me and not someone else? Also, I'm excited for Part 2.
In post 2192, pisskop wrote:I actually think looker is town. just a really bored town. I wish he'd take the game more cereal.
In post 2193, Starbuck wrote:I don't understand how you can be "bored town" when you haven't even been here other than to sling insults.
Just the formatting alone in the post SB mentioned doesn't give me the "bored" vibe.
Formatting is fun.
chkflip doesn't like my responses, so he calls them handwaving. (If I spoke Spanish and he spoke English, would the fact that I'm not speaking English mean I'm not speaking?) Either way, I'm not handwaving.
More fake outrage and profanity from chkflip. He feigns he knows how every townie plays; clearly he does not. Interestingly votes me because he feels others haven't answered my questions.
It would also be easier to take chkflip seriously if he were actually on IKS's wagon. As it stands, I feel he's bringing up things now he didn't before (as in all of D1), as a distraction. I'm still capable of enjoying the game, though.
I have no idea what Gamma's talking about. Him calling me a jackass is weird - I don't get it. Maybe it's a 'fight fire with fire' type deal, but I never insulted anyone to being with, so I really don't get his angle. Weak.
I'm gonna take a step further back and let the majority weigh in on the current situation before moving forward.
I will ask Walter and 50 to please place votes.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:09 am
by davesaz
How you get any correlation out of that specific post is a complete mystery to me.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:10 am
by NoPowerOverMe
Read List part 2
Lavender
*Uses lots of emojis
*Says contributing is "hard".
TR: Galron, TD, Gamma, Walter SR: Looker
Vote: NPOM, Looker
My Read: Not the best grammar, but they seem to be cognitavally transparent. Mild Town.
Bambi Jay
*Asks A50 to tell him his role.
*Doesn't like lurkers
*Saves energy for day 2.
*Worried about naked voting.
*Posts infrequently.
TR: Starbuck
Vote: Leia, IKS, Galron, IKS, NPOM
My Read: Probably town by POE.
TiphaneDeath
*Against quick wagons
*Says a lot without actually taking firm positions.
*Dave vs. Chk is not svs
SR: NPOM, Leia, Dave, TR: Pooky, Gamma, Pooky
Vote: Titus, Bambi, NPOM, Bambi, NPOM, Pooky, Leia, NPOM, IKS, Chk, NPOM, chk
My read: Seems to be fence sitting except with regards to me. Would like more fluffless content. Null.
WaltertheDunce
*Accuses TD of not contributing but not a great contributer himself.
*Has role known by others(role flavor)
*Doesn't like ice's read list.
*Think most wagons have been "shit."
TR: Gamma, TD SR: Galron, Bambi
Vote: DGB, IKS, Galron, Bambi, IKS, chk, NPOM, IKS
My read: Pretty towny overall
BrightEyedFish
*Agrees with rude on NPOM flavor.
*Confirmed band invite.
TR: Rude, A50, NPOM, Gamma, Looker, pisskop, Starbuck SR: dave, Walter
Vote: TD, Starbuck, TD, IKS, Walter
My read: not a lot of posts but those posts he does make are heavy content. Like his reads. Strong town.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:19 am
by davesaz
In post 2308, Looker wrote:chkflip doesn't like my responses, so he calls them handwaving. (If I spoke Spanish and he spoke English, would the fact that I'm not speaking English mean I'm not speaking?) Either way, I'm not handwaving.
If you make noises that the other person doesn't understand, you can be speaking but not communicating. If you do it on purpose knowing the other person won't understand, you're obfuscating which is scummy. It could also be that your responses are not on point to the things your responding to. Are you directly addressing the point, or talking around it?
I see you bringing up a bunch of things within the post I took the quote from, but I don't see much in the way of conclusions. What do those things mean in regards to alignments, and why?
She has been. I appreciate her post just above, but you and her have some work to do (in my eyes) before you're out of that category.
For the record, I used hindrance in regards to your gameplay and usefulness to the rest of us trying to eliminate scum. On top of that, you've done nothing in response to anything I've said other than insult me and be dickish in general with your "honest assessments." If you're a dick, just own it (like chk), but don't hide it behind by saying you're just "being honest." There is a difference.
Your response to my "seals the deal" comment in this post is gross and just proves more to me that you're being toxic on purpose. I remember replacing into a game that you were in and you didn't seem this awful. You want to toss around phrases like "acting like an adult," but you're obviously the one that needs to take a look in the mirror.
You've had ample opportunity to read the thread, make a case, and be useful, but yet you still refuse.
His posts seem earnest, I am not seeing lack of effort, vagueness, scummy phrasing, etc.
Subjectively I enjoy his posts but that NAI.
I'd have to disagree. I'm not seeing any attempt to solve, make a case, or contribute more than being generally insulting. He is spending more time stirring folks up than being of use or putting a case together.
I replaced into Grand Idea GPick, where Looker had already been playing. He replaced into that game a bit before me and has way more contributions as a replacement there than he does starting the game here.
