Mafiascum.net

Nahdia?

In post 2298, Cabd wrote:Lady alter ego, time for our double elim.

I'm still waiting for my flipped avatar.

In post 2300, Cabd wrote:Nahdia?

For town?

That's spicy.

Nah. For death.

Bell (214)
petapan (173)
midwaybear (155)
PookyTheMagicalBear (148)
SirCakez (132)
Alisae (124)
Gamma Emerald (91)
DiamondSentinel (75)
Nahdia (62)
The Bulge (24)

part of me thinks this could be worth thinking about. I think 1/2 more scum towards the bottom of the activity overview sorted by most posts, the rest upper-middle?

In post 2187, DiamondSentinel wrote:Yesterday I was dead set on Jake because I swore he was the scum in the dethy.

How could you possibly know about the Dethy?

In post 2304, Gamma Emerald wrote:part of me thinks this could be worth thinking about. I think 1/2 more scum towards the bottom of the activity overview sorted by most posts, the rest upper-middle?

why should there be a correlation between the postcounts of different scum players? wouldn't that be a player-dependent thing above all?

In post 2252, SirCakez wrote:none of their content seems very town-motivated

???

In post 2306, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 2304, Gamma Emerald wrote:part of me thinks this could be worth thinking about. I think 1/2 more scum towards the bottom of the activity overview sorted by most posts, the rest upper-middle?

why should there be a correlation between the postcounts of different scum players? wouldn't that be a player-dependent thing above all?

idk that's just my gamestate sense

btw someone asked why I TRed Alisae's posting, I think e's trying to solve somewhat genuinely

In post 2308, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2306, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 2304, Gamma Emerald wrote:part of me thinks this could be worth thinking about. I think 1/2 more scum towards the bottom of the activity overview sorted by most posts, the rest upper-middle?

why should there be a correlation between the postcounts of different scum players? wouldn't that be a player-dependent thing above all?

idk that's just my gamestate sense

btw someone asked why I TRed Alisae's posting, I think e's trying to solve somewhat genuinely

Weird how you can get that conclusion but cakez can get a different conclusion

why should me and Cakez have similar conclusions? Also I know you said you townread me earlier, are you stating you think Cakez is sus?

In post 2310, Gamma Emerald wrote:why should me and Cakez have similar conclusions? Also I know you said you townread me earlier, are you stating you think Cakez is sus?

I think Taylor could have signaled to cakez ya

I did agree with that when you quoted the posts from Tay
VOTE: Cakez

I also think scum would probably want to keep me in the PoE as long as possible and thats why voting me tries to accomplish

In post 2303, Cabd wrote:Nah. For death.

One pizza and one vote elim.

If i'd had pizza N1 we'd be talking about bells' flip.

Or rather, we would but I wouldn't have shot there after you got all killjoy about it.

We should flip Diamond > Nahdia.
I don’t think Diamond is scum with Nahdia so if Diamond is scum Nahdia becomes a worse shot

I also think it's a bit unlikely Cakez and Nahdia are scum together

In post 2305, Alisae wrote:

In post 2187, DiamondSentinel wrote:Yesterday I was dead set on Jake because I swore he was the scum in the dethy.

How could you possibly know about the Dethy?

Because they fucking said as much.

Are you that fucking dense that you cannot fucking read what other people are fucking saying?

I get it. You don't want to actually do any work and you're just trying to deathtunnel me because who fucking knows, but at least put in some fucking effort about what you're tunneling on.

In post 2317, DiamondSentinel wrote:Because they fucking said as much.

not when you voted Jake which was before the dethy was announced
You were hard pushing that before the dethy was public info

Congrats. You can push someone and then get even reasons for pushing someone.

can we tone down the anger.

I'm fairly sure we will win the game easily and there is no need for people to get angry rn.

I would also not describe your 3 posts after the Deathy was announced as “Deadset”

Like saying you were deadset on Jake of the Deathy is just wrong.

In post 2319, DiamondSentinel wrote:Congrats. You can push someone and then get even

more

reasons for pushing someone.

I felt like you completely discounted and in fact misinterpreted, deliberately or not, that I said Jake's reaction to pressure in the dethy neighborhood looked town.

It kinda blew my mind that, if you believed us about there being a dethy, you'd consider the players who had out-of-thread knowledge of Tayl04 and Jake to be worse at gauging their relative likelihoods of being the traitor than you were.

Other players asked about what had transpired in the dethy, but that's not where your mind went. Instead it was "gestures broadly" about the data in the game thread.