Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:26 pm
I don’t like this questionIn post 2296, Bypasser Catcher wrote:andres, do you see a world where town!hayker + scum!me exists?
I don’t like this questionIn post 2296, Bypasser Catcher wrote:andres, do you see a world where town!hayker + scum!me exists?
Can you like read the game?In post 2304, Vaxkiller wrote:What did he do?
why?In post 2300, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t like this questionIn post 2296, Bypasser Catcher wrote:andres, do you see a world where town!hayker + scum!me exists?
k i dont want u in any towncore that exists either.In post 2302, Andresvmb wrote:@Bypasser if your reads are bad then I’m not interested in discussing with you what to do. That push yesterday was bad and Scum piled on. I am almost certain {Luca, quiet} need to get executed. You? Maybe slightly less so. You can tunnel and be obnoxious when you think you’re right and you’re not. And perhaps you would try to pocket me more. But still, you’re not going to go into any Town core of mine any time soon.
Im read up, give me the readers digest version.In post 2305, Andresvmb wrote:Can you like read the game?In post 2304, Vaxkiller wrote:What did he do?
Why do you say that?In post 2306, Bypasser Catcher wrote:why?In post 2300, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t like this questionIn post 2296, Bypasser Catcher wrote:andres, do you see a world where town!hayker + scum!me exists?
andres isn't an IC bud.
im retracting their logic to see how they reached the conclusion that i have to be part of their limpool today over anyone else.
In post 2136, quiet wrote:huh I guess the nero wagon was viable after all.
I may have had very light reasons to vote Nero when I jumped on the wagon from Hayker, but I am exceptionally happy to be on this wagon right now. My vote stays. Don't buy the claim whatsoever. The only progression I saw was anger at everyone voting them -> depression self vote -> no point in bargaining -> acceptance of their fate. But also I know for a fact I don't like playing with angry players, and that might be coloring my read. I didn't have the time I wanted to read over old games, but I'm satisfied enough with what has been said.
Plus I'm with Norfolk, and a few others. This sure as hell seems to provide a lot more info than Hayker's elim.
Also the gamestate seemed to change pretty seriously since I last posted. Today was some early susses, then an almost casual hammer on NM, a slow moving, stalled out wagon on Hayker, then whatever the hell the last 20something pages have been of fighting over Nero's slot. Three very different wagons.
Does anyone have a take on why the game slowed down when Hayker was up? Is it just because it wasn't a very exciting elim?
Information to justify an execution? A policy argument based on a fake claim? A seemingly informed distancing argument about Nero Cain and Not_Mafia? Yeah, I don’t think I’m going to be trusting this slot any time soon.In post 2193, quiet wrote:This was not my read whatsoever. I read them as either distancing, or trying to claim that NM had faked the tracker claim, that he was the real tracker all along.In post 2182, Andresvmb wrote:Here’s my issue with your logic here. You are quite certain that Not_Mafia is Scum and making a false Role claim correct? So why are you happy about your Nero vote again? Nero is so sure Not_Mafia is Scum, they fakeclaimed Not_Mafia’s role in frustration. So clearly they’re not aligned as Scum.
Or are you saying this is VT fakeclaiming a PR???
I elim that anyway.
In post 2309, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why do you say that?In post 2306, Bypasser Catcher wrote:why?In post 2300, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t like this questionIn post 2296, Bypasser Catcher wrote:andres, do you see a world where town!hayker + scum!me exists?
andres isn't an IC bud.
im retracting their logic to see how they reached the conclusion that i have to be part of their limpool today over anyone else.
Why would I want to execute the counter wagon that some of the Scummy slots on Nero were perfectly happy to switch back and forth from? I don’t think so.In post 2311, Bypasser Catcher wrote:In post 2309, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why do you say that?In post 2306, Bypasser Catcher wrote:why?In post 2300, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t like this questionIn post 2296, Bypasser Catcher wrote:andres, do you see a world where town!hayker + scum!me exists?
andres isn't an IC bud.
im retracting their logic to see how they reached the conclusion that i have to be part of their limpool today over anyone else.
because i was fucking sus of them d1 !!!!!!!!!!!
it feels just way too fucking convenient ok.
and them stating they dont wanna lim hayker is setting off huge fucking sirens in my head.
k i dont know who nero is but the way they came off sounds like a whiny child who definitely doesnt feel like they are good at this game.In post 2314, Andresvmb wrote:Like if I had to summarize it - a few arguments were made about Nero and that wagon escalated quickly. Onto what you would agree is a good player, correct? A few players seized on Norwegian’s and Momrangal’s meta logic, which was quite obviously incorrect (and Nero blasted it in those terms), and then the reasoning provided by quiet above.
There’s Scum in there. Bypasser was also cheering the wagon way too aggressively, pouncing on every little thing and making it seem like the Scummiest thing that anybody had ever done.
Obviously there’s also Scum off the wagon. I think Ranny is a good candidate for that.
We’re not doing this. Not nearly enough reason to execute Titus.In post 2315, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Fuck quoting on mobile.
I’m trying to get a tiny part of a post but it only get’s the entire thing.
Anyway, my reaction to Mini’s death is that there is no way scum killed them for any other reason than as a fear kill. Which immediately makes me paranoid of Titus.
I’m sorry if you’re town Titus but this is the first thought in my mind.
oh i know about this role, quite embarassing actually as ive been caught by this very role as scum!In post 2321, Binatog13 wrote:I don't understand the Town Role Watcher. Is it like the same as the ordinary watcher?
oh u reminded me that there was something about titus i wanted to bring up ?In post 2315, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Fuck quoting on mobile.
I’m trying to get a tiny part of a post but it only get’s the entire thing.
Anyway, my reaction to Mini’s death is that there is no way scum killed them for any other reason than as a fear kill. Which immediately makes me paranoid of Titus.
I’m sorry if you’re town Titus but this is the first thought in my mind.