Page 94 of 323

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:23 pm
by 0verki11
In post 2323, OkaPoka wrote:Since coalition size changes based on playerlist

It would be best if we shrunk down the playerlist a bit before we coalitioned

But we want to shrink it as much as possible without having nk's happen

Which is the theory behind dance first i think
yes but if another scum dies it becomes unusable

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:23 pm
by OkaPoka
i thought coalition worked with 2 maf alive?

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:23 pm
by Titus
In post 2321, NanceFloor wrote:Like I feel like mafia having control over the pairs is bad

but maybe I just have Merchant's Daughter ptsd
We did fine with 8ball, but I think the wishes have been noted. As far as I know with my reset, I have a lock core of 3 slots, me, tmck and Oka. I need to look at the VCs too.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:24 pm
by Titus
In post 2326, OkaPoka wrote:i thought coalition worked with 2 maf alive?
It does.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:24 pm
by 0verki11
wait I read it wrong nvm

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:24 pm
by OkaPoka
And we happen to hit a scum pair in a dance then we 1of4 and just win


pedit: its ok overkill

happened to me too

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:25 pm
by chennisden
In post 2282, OkaPoka wrote:I would like everyone to sign onto the idea that both coalition pools must be with completely separate people barring the repicker
terrible idea.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:26 pm
by 0verki11
If we do dance do we afterwards Reavel LHF and then coalition?

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:26 pm
by OkaPoka
I'm just wondering if veto'ing first is ever worth it

IF we have 4 slots that are straight up going to be ? forever it might be

pedit: chennis we've moved on pls dont bring up any of my theorycrafting posts

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:28 pm
by chennisden
i was catching up

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:28 pm
by chennisden
i think vetoing first is not a terrible idea.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:29 pm
by chennisden
putting the four scummiest slots there might help with coal

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:29 pm
by Titus
Double veto? We can load RC in with his scumpool.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:29 pm
by Titus
Oh wait his scpool is obvtown

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:30 pm
by 0verki11
In post 2333, OkaPoka wrote:I'm just wondering if veto'ing first is ever worth it

IF we have 4 slots that are straight up going to be ? forever it might be

pedit: chennis we've moved on pls dont bring up any of my theorycrafting posts
I mean if we veto right we auto win
If we dont we lose 2 LHF/scummy town and we kept a town alive. Might be worth instead of a reavel.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:31 pm
by chennisden
We veto once as an intermediate step to doing something that will win.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:32 pm
by OkaPoka
I'm just spitting out ideas that would make the coalition easier

But I think two shots at coalition is preferable to having an easier one coalition

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:33 pm
by Titus
Why don't we just put in the major d1 wagons in the veto? Force scum to deal with my VCA.

Then, for the next veto, we'll have empirical data.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:35 pm
by OkaPoka
I still think one veto and two coalitions is better than two vetos and one coalition

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:36 pm
by Titus
In post 2343, OkaPoka wrote:I still think one veto and two coalitions is better than two vetos and one coalition
I can live with that. My VCA, even if not rock solid, can fuel the coalitions.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:37 pm
by OkaPoka
That's fine.

Veto -> Dance -> Coalition x2 stands to be the gameplan then?

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:37 pm
by Titus
P.S. I have about 40% confident RC is floundering scum.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:38 pm
by Titus
In post 2345, OkaPoka wrote:That's fine.

Veto -> Dance -> Coalition x2 stands to be the gameplan then?
Wait why is Dance there now?

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:38 pm
by OkaPoka
I was thinking we could potentially use dance to cut down more people to make a coalition stronger.

Plus we can always choose not to lynch a dance pair. Scum still don't nk.

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:40 pm
by Titus
In post 2348, OkaPoka wrote:I was thinking we could potentially use dance to cut down more people to make a coalition stronger.

Plus we can always choose not to lynch a dance pair. Scum still don't nk.
We'd have to kill in Dance.