Mafiascum.net

In post 2322, skitter30 wrote:Like on some level i'm confused that we seem to be playing like two different games ...

It feels very similar to last game from this perspective =/

Skitter thinks that scum Nero would see a cop claim and hop on a wagon that was going to have a natural aversion to it and cause a ton of undue attention to myself when I was WELL under the radar and I could have just quietly killed that or blocked that if I have a role blocker.



How did she even win a best scum scummie?

In post 2323, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 2319, skitter30 wrote:.... cuz scun doesnt fake-claim cop that way because they're exasperated and then immediately retract it (esp after someone actually bought it!)

oh I thought you were calling the mod would have punished shoshin thing a psuedo-cop check. Why isn't that vote scummy?

I don't see why that's out of an average scum range. like at all. Especially the part in parentheses. like of course scum would retract it there if they weren't planning on actually making the claim

the only question is if scum would make the joke and like, why not?

Idk i dont really have a strong opinion on flub's shoshin vote

For flubber's cop thing - it came from exasperation at being wagoned and how shoshin was being wagoned - i dont think scum get annoyed that a cop claim is getting wagoned really to the point that they lolvlaim cop to express their frustration

Okay now I'm thinking skitter could be scum. But it relies on me being wrong on teacher because the sheeping her reads he did like at least 3 times never comes from a scum partner I think.

Just seems like she's been doing more complaining about gamestates, confusing reads, weird posts, and wagons than the normal level I would expect from town!skitter.

In post 2327, skitter30 wrote:Idk i dont really have a strong opinion on flub's shoshin vote

For flubber's cop thing - it came from exasperation at being wagoned and how shoshin was being wagoned - i dont think scum get annoyed that a cop claim is getting wagoned really to the point that they lolvlaim cop to express their frustration

none of this makes sense. it doesn't make sense that you don't have an opinion of that vote. it doesn't make sense that you buy his exasperation over the wagon after being on the wagon as he was. How are you reading the game this way I don't understand

In post 2217, skitter30 wrote:i guess i'd switch to nero out of all the current options but i feel p strongly that urap isn't town at this point

you feel strongly that urap is scum but you are voting me instead of urap?

People who CAN'T be scum together:

Skitter / teacher
Vork / nero
Nom / sho (wow if this is true though am I right, goddamn kodak and scum award for both)

I think I had one or two more hang on

In post 2328, NerfedBuJ wrote:Okay now I'm thinking skitter could be scum. But it relies on me being wrong on teacher because the sheeping her reads he did like at least 3 times never comes from a scum partner I think.

Just seems like she's been doing more complaining about gamestates, confusing reads, weird posts, and wagons than the normal level I would expect from town!skitter.

Cuz thr gamestate is crap and i'm getting frustrated because i havent wanted likr any of the major wagons over the past couple of days

In post 2326, Nero Cain wrote:How did she even win a best scum scummie?

Nero's immediate go-to for any pressure on him is toxic AtE. I've seen way more toxic AtE from scum lately than from town.

In post 2331, NerfedBuJ wrote:People who CAN'T be scum together:

Skitter / teacher
Vork / nero
Nom / sho (wow if this is true though am I right, goddamn kodak and scum award for both)

I think I had one or two more hang on

this is really townie reaching tbh

In post 2331, NerfedBuJ wrote:People who CAN'T be scum together:

Skitter / teacher
Vork / nero
Nom / sho (wow if this is true though am I right, goddamn kodak and scum award for both)

I think I had one or two more hang on

Oh right cinn/vork

Probably urap/skitter ?

In post 2329, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 2327, skitter30 wrote:Idk i dont really have a strong opinion on flub's shoshin vote

For flubber's cop thing - it came from exasperation at being wagoned and how shoshin was being wagoned - i dont think scum get annoyed that a cop claim is getting wagoned really to the point that they lolvlaim cop to express their frustration

none of this makes sense. it doesn't make sense that you don't have an opinion of that vote. it doesn't make sense that you buy his exasperation over the wagon after being on the wagon as he was. How are you reading the game this way I don't understand

I can see town!him and scum!him making that post. I dont know which is more likely

I dont get ehy i wouldnt buy his exasperation over the shoshin wagon. I dont know offhand what wagon he was on at the time he made that post

And like i said i dont understand like anything you're saying this gamr

In post 2334, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 2331, NerfedBuJ wrote:People who CAN'T be scum together:

Skitter / teacher
Vork / nero
Nom / sho (wow if this is true though am I right, goddamn kodak and scum award for both)

I think I had one or two more hang on

this is really townie reaching tbh

What does this mean

In post 2330, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 2217, skitter30 wrote:i guess i'd switch to nero out of all the current options but i feel p strongly that urap isn't town at this point

you feel strongly that urap is scum but you are voting me instead of urap?

Because i recognize that there may be some universe where i'm tunneled on him

In post 2333, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 2326, Nero Cain wrote:How did she even win a best scum scummie?

Nero's immediate go-to for any pressure on him is toxic AtE. I've seen way more toxic AtE from scum lately than from town.

that's not toxic or ate

In post 2333, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 2326, Nero Cain wrote:How did she even win a best scum scummie?

Nero's immediate go-to for any pressure on him is toxic AtE. I've seen way more toxic AtE from scum lately than from town.

Yeah i didnt really feel the need to respond to that

In post 2338, skitter30 wrote:

In post 2330, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 2217, skitter30 wrote:i guess i'd switch to nero out of all the current options but i feel p strongly that urap isn't town at this point

you feel strongly that urap is scum but you are voting me instead of urap?

Because i recognize that there may be some universe where i'm tunneled on him

So you are more worried that you are tunneling than being wrong on me.

I'll be back again later

Pedit yep

In post 2337, NerfedBuJ wrote:What does this mean

Buj probably town cause I don't think scum just randomly pulls that out of their butt lol

Like if my other reads are garbo I think I can go Cinnamon / NerfedBuJ / skitter30 / u r a person 2 as towncore even if they all think the rest of the block is scum

Cinnamon only one I'm even maybe wrong on there and I think I'm right most of the time on him

I'm disappointed that I'm not part of your town core.

In post 2345, Shoshin wrote:I'm disappointed that I'm not part of your town core.

Putting scums in towncores is probably a bad idea.

In post 2282, u r a person 2 wrote:I think Shoshin resolves soon enough.

Wow! So do I! That's why it's a waste of my damn time do an extensive analysis of their play!

Try again.

In post 2296, u r a person 2 wrote:Prior to shoshin replacing in and prior to the thread exploading, flubber's positioning on ED was based ENTIRELY on other people's reads. Here are the posts from his iso

Yeah this is how you read lurkers.

In post 2343, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 2337, NerfedBuJ wrote:What does this mean

Buj probably town cause I don't think scum just randomly pulls that out of their butt lol

Like if my other reads are garbo I think I can go Cinnamon / NerfedBuJ / skitter30 / u r a person 2 as towncore even if they all think the rest of the block is scum

I mean I think most of those non-team assocs are pretty obvious. I just didn't see anyone mentioning things like that and I'm preeety sure at least some of those pairings ARE being considered as possible by some so it had to be said.

I think early pages might not tell you a lot of concrete stuff about alignment beyond gut most of the time (though gut reads can be very strong/accurate), but in a lot of games they can tell you with huge confidence who is NOT scum together. There's just certain things people aren't likely to say to a partner, and I feel like in the early pages it's much harder to plan interactions, so it's very unlikely that it would be elaborate theater.