Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:58 am
I think I mixed that up. I replaced in before him. My point is that he attempts the solve there. He's not doing that here.
I wasn't trying to be. It seemed like a badge you were proud of.In post 2324, chkflip wrote:Rude.In post 2322, Starbuck wrote:If you're a dick, just own it (like chk)
In post 2046, Iecerint wrote:Walter, what do you make of people suspecting you?
I have noticed that you almost totally ignore it.
I actually like your reads a lot; they seem to come from a town mindset. I don't reallyIn post 2333, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If you're going to poke holes in my reads you should just do it and not beat around the bush.
If you're that set on me being scum, wouldn't my ISO come first...? Also, in your Part 1, what read list of mine did Galron criticize?
Like I said - irrelevant personality preferences from an arrogant victim who insulted me first.In post 2324, chkflip wrote:Rude.In post 2322, Starbuck wrote:If you're a dick, just own it (like chk)
What's this mean?In post 2336, Looker wrote:2 more
tbf if today hadn't started out as it did I might have looked at itIn post 2286, chkflip wrote:Five days. I looked into it five days into the phase when it became obvious y'all are super content with terrible lhf wagons. What's the farce is when people said there was info there and then proceeded to not fucking use it.
You do understand what filibuster actually means, right? Because IKS was filibustering. I'm posting actual reads, engaging as many people as I can, and making sure we don't throw the phase on bad play by shredding, here it comes again, lhf.
This is Lavender's town game. Sorry you're unfamiliar and I'm well aware that the slot is difficult to deal with and not exactly helpful. They will not be making it to endgame but another zero-info flip doesn't help us rn.
This is Walter's town game. Sorry you're unfamiliar and, while not as much teeth pulling is required, it's pretty sunshine clear that he also steadily falls under the lhf category. Sorry not sorry.
I have reason to believe someone here said a thing about NPOM and am not willing to shred there just yet either.
It's paper-thin though. I will bet you dollars-to-donuts Lavender won't continue any of the engagement shown there, and just post whatever is called of her the next time she is summoned into the thread.In post 2290, Galron wrote:It was more a comment of recent activity. I was surprised enough to make a note of it.In post 2281, Gamma Emerald wrote:No. I generally find your content towny, but this just isn’t true.In post 2266, Galron wrote:Lavender is engaged.
NPOM was a stronger PR than IKS?In post 2302, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:why wouldnt scum just choose to push NPOM instead? why even get rid of IKS?
I feel like the quips at the bottom of your posts only serve to be inflammatoryIn post 2308, Looker wrote:"You're evil if you disagree" is the core of mafia.In post 2228, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Scum dbg for sure if they think looker is town and lav is scumThat you don't know? I don't think Starbuck or chkflip will find that answer acceptable.In post 2256, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:AwfulIn post 2255, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:is it bad I want to keep him around just to watch you insult him?
Looker, what did you make of my reply, then?
- Racially, this should be reversed.
- If anything, this should be me watching "Mad chkflip" self-destruct.
- I also feel his phony distress is manufactured.
Are they screaming at you in the scum PT? "I'm going to vote Looker sO ChKfLiP IsN't aNgRy" lmao Don't make it too easyIn post 2261, Lavender wrote:Ah you're right NPOM, I read that incorrectly, well who's the scum on your wagon?
And uh, before chkflip explodes once more, just gonna VOTE: Looker ( ⚆ _ ⚆ )I don't make D1 read lists - are you sure he criticized me and not someone else? Also, I'm excited for Part 2.In post 2294, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Galron
*Was one of the first to vote IKS. "Out of the gate scummy"
*Criticized Lookers read list early day 1.
*Said he wasn't on NPOM due to rude. Then voted NPOM.
TR: a2, Ice, piss, npom, chk
Votes: IKS, Walter, NPOM, Walter
My Read: Solid Town. Not making rash judgements.Formatting is fun.In post 2300, BrightEyedFish wrote:Spoiler:
Just the formatting alone in the post SB mentioned doesn't give me the "bored" vibe.
3 more
- chkflip doesn't like my responses, so he calls them handwaving. (If I spoke Spanish and he spoke English, would the fact that I'm not speaking English mean I'm not speaking?) Either way, I'm not handwaving.
- More fake outrage and profanity from chkflip. He feigns he knows how every townie plays; clearly he does not. Interestingly votes me because he feels others haven't answered my questions.
- It would also be easier to take chkflip seriously if he were actually on IKS's wagon. As it stands, I feel he's bringing up things now he didn't before (as in all of D1), as a distraction. I'm still capable of enjoying the game, though.
- I have no idea what Gamma's talking about. Him calling me a jackass is weird - I don't get it. Maybe it's a 'fight fire with fire' type deal, but I never insulted anyone to being with, so I really don't get his angle. Weak.
- More chkflip "irritation"
- "Anger gets shit done" Not really believable
- "Tactless" jab from Gamma
can you post all of these in spoiler= tags alongside a full readlist when you're done?In post 2320, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Read List part 2
Lavender
*Uses lots of emojis
*Says contributing is "hard".
TR: Galron, TD, Gamma, Walter SR: Looker
Vote: NPOM, Looker
My Read: Not the best grammar, but they seem to be cognitavally transparent. Mild Town.
Bambi Jay
*Asks A50 to tell him his role.
*Doesn't like lurkers
*Saves energy for day 2.
*Worried about naked voting.
*Posts infrequently.
TR: Starbuck
Vote: Leia, IKS, Galron, IKS, NPOM
My Read: Probably town by POE.
TiphaneDeath
*Against quick wagons
*Says a lot without actually taking firm positions.
*Dave vs. Chk is not svs
SR: NPOM, Leia, Dave, TR: Pooky, Gamma, Pooky
Vote: Titus, Bambi, NPOM, Bambi, NPOM, Pooky, Leia, NPOM, IKS, Chk, NPOM, chk
My read: Seems to be fence sitting except with regards to me. Would like more fluffless content. Null.
WaltertheDunce
*Accuses TD of not contributing but not a great contributer himself.
*Has role known by others(role flavor)
*Doesn't like ice's read list.
*Think most wagons have been "shit."
TR: Gamma, TD SR: Galron, Bambi
Vote: DGB, IKS, Galron, Bambi, IKS, chk, NPOM, IKS
My read: Pretty towny overall
BrightEyedFish
*Agrees with rude on NPOM flavor.
*Confirmed band invite.
TR: Rude, A50, NPOM, Gamma, Looker, pisskop, Starbuck SR: dave, Walter
Vote: TD, Starbuck, TD, IKS, Walter
My read: not a lot of posts but those posts he does make are heavy content. Like his reads. Strong town.
what are even trying to argue here?In post 2345, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so why wouldnt we elim NPOM?
Don't attempt to use something against me and then backtrack on it when I bring up a valid point. You're wasting both of our time.In post 2341, Gamma Emerald wrote:tbf if today hadn't started out as it did I might have looked at it
That's... not what that means, dude.In post 2341, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also, you say "IKS was filibustering" but back when that was actively happening you were standing with him. Don't try to revise your actions to put yourself on the right side of history.
You don't get to criticize someone's town game and, upon being corrected, say you don't give a fuck.In post 2341, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't care what Lavender's towngame is
He hasn't, actually.In post 2341, Gamma Emerald wrote:Walter I haven't pushed myself so I can't speak on it. The only person who "said a thing" on NPOM in the way you're indicating is rudeboy, and he's walked that back by now.