Mafiascum.net

I dunno. maybe that should be a crazy-ass townpoint.

I think we live in a demotivated scum world

In post 1833, Gamma Emerald wrote:I've been seeing some ties between tay and tammy in more recent posts, what's up with that

So I was retreading my own posts to pick up where I left off and saw this
safe to say I understand what this was about now

You said that after the dethy was announced. Honestly, I don't get you more than Bell this game.

ffery I think diamond is lieing about wanting Jake because of the deathy but that’s just my opinion

In post 2312, Gamma Emerald wrote:I did agree with that when you quoted the posts from Tay
VOTE: Cakez

is that really all it takes for you to vote someone

The lazy in me wants to just vote one pizza the other.

The not lazy In me wants to gamesolve for real.

also bulge needs to step up or eat lead.

kinda rude that i get all the shade for not being here but at least im fucking reading the game

Scummoned~


But seriously man. Do stuff with the results of your reading stuff.

In post 2331, Cabd wrote:The lazy in me wants to just vote one pizza the other.

The not lazy In me wants to gamesolve for real.

also bulge needs to step up or eat lead.

Bulge is going on site and ignoring this game so its likely him

In post 2174, Tammy wrote:I wish bulge's only real game posts weren't on verifying dethy stuff.

I super appreciated the more methodical way he approached the outing yesterday, but I'd like to see something more that just verifying that what we've said is agreed upon by all of us.

I'll admit i wasn't so much investigating anything myself as making sure there was some accountability w the yaya hood

In post 2172, Alisae wrote:

In post 2170, Tammy wrote:him claiming nahdia hadn't made enough posts to be read by yesterday when I asked, but today his case is based on Nadia's posts from yesterday as if they're a smoking gun.

RED FLAG
RED FLAG

In post 2185, Alisae wrote:When I read it I felt like he's forcing himself to defending a bad take because he can't back out

feeling alisae a lot today

In post 2194, Cabd wrote:This is probably sub optimal play, but having 5 clears out of 15 alive is better than 3 clears out of 15 alive for you.

not sure how relevant this is now but was your saying this before claiming mason some way of signalling to ffery? because i dont see how the original millerizer claim clwars anybody

In post 2304, Gamma Emerald wrote:

fferyllt (291)
Cabd (287)

Bell (214)

Tammy (186)

petapan (173)
midwaybear (155)
PookyTheMagicalBear (148)
SirCakez (132)
Alisae (124)

Syryana (92)

Gamma Emerald (91)

Something_Smart (90)

DiamondSentinel (75)

Tayl0r Swift (65)

Nahdia (62)

Jake The Wolfie (58)

The Bulge (24)

part of me thinks this could be worth thinking about. I think 1/2 more scum towards the bottom of the activity overview sorted by most posts, the rest upper-middle?

what led you to this conclusion?

In post 2319, DiamondSentinel wrote:Congrats. You can push someone and then get even

more

reasons for pushing someone.

VOTE: DS

It's more accurate to say that about half of my ISO is in some way a message to her

oh lol i didnt see cabd's latest 2 posts

hey

In post 2330, petapan wrote:

In post 2312, Gamma Emerald wrote:I did agree with that when you quoted the posts from Tay
VOTE: Cakez

is that really all it takes for you to vote someone

I was expecting Alisae to vote with me and we'd start a wagon
but I also think SC's pushing of Nahdia is ringing a little sketchy at this point

btw fferyllt has talked about me having mastina-style catchup but not really done much other than express dissatisfaction with it so I'll give my piece rather than wait for someone to address me on it. I do tend to catch up similarly to mastina, but the key difference is I don't ignore current events when catching up, though I should do that sometimes as it distracts me at times

Im not voting with you because I think I could possibly be wrong on Cakez.
I much rather want this
VOTE: Diamond

In post 2338, The Bulge wrote:

In post 2304, Gamma Emerald wrote:

fferyllt (291)
Cabd (287)

Bell (214)

Tammy (186)

petapan (173)
midwaybear (155)
PookyTheMagicalBear (148)
SirCakez (132)
Alisae (124)

Syryana (92)

Gamma Emerald (91)

Something_Smart (90)

DiamondSentinel (75)

Tayl0r Swift (65)

Nahdia (62)

Jake The Wolfie (58)

The Bulge (24)

part of me thinks this could be worth thinking about. I think 1/2 more scum towards the bottom of the activity overview sorted by most posts, the rest upper-middle?

what led you to this conclusion?

The fact that the Taylor vote out happened the way it did is probably the biggest thing making me think this matters

That tell tends to be extremely accurate in anonymous games although I'm not so sure it applies to games where people are playing on their mains as far as activity level goes

It was true for the second anonymous dance game and it was true for fake grand order but I'm not entirely sure it would apply to a game like this to find all of the scum in the low-hanging post counts

I will say that regardless of post count if I were scum this game I would be incredibly heartbroken having a second masonry pop in after the first one had already kicked me in the dick

In post 2342, Gamma Emerald wrote:but I also think SC's pushing of Nahdia is ringing a little sketchy at this point

cakez hasn't pushed nahdia since day 1 and he backed down roughly the same time as you did

what changed exactly?

In post 2347, Cabd wrote:I will say that regardless of post count if I were scum this game I would be incredibly heartbroken having a second masonry pop in after the first one had already kicked me in the dick

This game's design is interesting considering its a FakeGod game