Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:13 am
Didn’t you know that no matter the flips and results it will always add up to me being scum.
That’s every game i’m in btw.
That’s every game i’m in btw.
I missed this. Interesting.In post 1259, Almost50 wrote:There's a lack of a certain scumtell that should have been there if he was scum indeed.In post 1242, Ban Hydras wrote:Can I get a bit more on this.
I think people are trying to migrate away from all these terms in general, so if you remember to there’s no harm in replacing what you canIn post 2320, PlusJOYED wrote:also question
i dont use l word but i like saying lylo, is that ok
elo sounds like matchmaking rank
In post 1809, April Ludgate wrote:Gamma prob town
You too. What's the town!Gamma argument?In post 2054, April Ludgate wrote:Gamma’s town
In post 1698, Tayl0r Swift wrote:actually i was hoping the masonry would confirm so we could stop speculating about this nonsense and get back to playing mafia. whatever. i mean there was a small element of playfulness, but mostly it was helpfulness. especially since i do townread you A50 and want to work with you as we have in the past.In post 1696, Almost50 wrote:Taylor OBVIOUSLY knew she would be called out on her fake claim, so I am not sure that would earn her any scum points. She was just being playful IMHO.
Awkward. I don't see scum coming in and fake claiming here.In post 1699, Almost50 wrote:We can work together without making unnecessary gambits (please don't misunderstand me. I LOVE to gambit, and I do it all the time. I just thought this one would have been risky if -say- our third came in and CC'd you. Imagine what scum would do to you, me and sb in that case)
In post 1721, Tayl0r Swift wrote:seems like a pretty impressive scumteam. i think that theory about 10 scum might not be that far off.In post 1719, Almost50 wrote:You are, and so am I.. and a couple more (I don't remember all of them, but I seem to remember DS expressing the same notion). And -by extension- my Mason buddies are also Scum (although I've been trying to convince sb to trust my TR on Gamma). Who else? I guess that's about it. 6-8 scums all on the same team.In post 1712, Tayl0r Swift wrote:also why does the gamma wagon, as weak as it seems to be, have such longevity? this gamestate doesnt make sense to me if gamma is scum. here i go defending gamma. i guess i must be scum too. oops.
And you. Why do you have town!gamma?In post 1723, Tayl0r Swift wrote:oof. big oof. hmm. youre still probably town, but i dont like the vote or the timing.In post 1722, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Ban HydrasIn post 1713, NorwegianboyEE wrote:To be fair, i would gladly switch to Ban Hydras if it became apparent interest in eliminating Gamma was dying.
I've already expressed why I want to vote here, and I think now is the best time to do it.
There ARE counterwagons.In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
There were not until they were already at E-3. They’ve been at E-3 for half of this phase.In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There ARE counterwagons.In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
Jesus.
i don't think that's clearing?In post 2336, DiamondSentinel wrote:There were not until they were already at E-3. They’ve been at E-3 for half of this phase.In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There ARE counterwagons.In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
Jesus.
/shrugIn post 2337, Chemist1422 wrote:i don't think that's clearing?In post 2336, DiamondSentinel wrote:There were not until they were already at E-3. They’ve been at E-3 for half of this phase.In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There ARE counterwagons.In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
Jesus.
could just be a failure for gamma's partners to be proactively pushing stuff until after they realized he was in trouble
Lol i dont agree with this sentiment just reporting back the bs reasons others have givenIn post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There ARE counterwagons.In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
Jesus.
This take is still as shit as the last five people who had it. We're not even the top poster. We've essentially got two heads here and there's plenty of people with more posts than me or Hectic. You personally have more posts than either of us. So does Nero. Superbowl has more than both of us put together. Apparently we're the only ones spamming the thread. Sure.In post 1592, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’d rather ask first if I’m answering a question directed at someone else.In post 1318, Bell wrote:Since when did you need permission to do so?In post 1316, Gamma Emerald wrote:May I speak my own mind?
I don’t personally mind hydrae, but these ones are deliberately acting to inflate the thread. I don’t think either on its own is a problem, but they’re making the situation worse together by egging each other on. So I think it will be healthy for the game length for one of them to go. I obviously prefer MM to go but BH can go and I won’t feel too bad about it.
Oh boy, if you people thought we had a lot of pages, just wait till you see this guy post.In post 2339, schadd_ wrote:shellyc replaces samantha97
jesus christ like we needed more heavy postersIn post 2339, schadd_ wrote:shellyc replaces samantha97
True we need more people to lurk and contribute nothingIn post 2343, PlusJOYED wrote:jesus christ like we needed more heavy postersIn post 2339, schadd_ wrote:shellyc replaces samantha97
yeah ban hydrasIn post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There ARE counterwagons.In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
Jesus.
why declare intent for l1