Page 94 of 333

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:13 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Didn’t you know that no matter the flips and results it will always add up to me being scum.
That’s every game i’m in btw.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:16 am
by TheGoldenParadox
intent to l-1

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:19 am
by Pickaxe Pete
In post 1259, Almost50 wrote:
In post 1242, Ban Hydras wrote:Can I get a bit more on this.
There's a lack of a certain scumtell that should have been there if he was scum indeed.
I missed this. Interesting.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:21 am
by superbowl9
In post 2320, PlusJOYED wrote:also question
i dont use l word but i like saying lylo, is that ok
elo sounds like matchmaking rank
I think people are trying to migrate away from all these terms in general, so if you remember to there’s no harm in replacing what you can

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:22 am
by Chemist1422
xylo/exlo always felt cool to me

[x] yeet or lose, [x] or lose/execute or lose

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:22 am
by Pickaxe Pete
In post 1809, April Ludgate wrote:Gamma prob town
In post 2054, April Ludgate wrote:Gamma’s town
You too. What's the town!Gamma argument?

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:29 am
by Pickaxe Pete
In post 1698, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 1696, Almost50 wrote:Taylor OBVIOUSLY knew she would be called out on her fake claim, so I am not sure that would earn her any scum points. She was just being playful IMHO.
actually i was hoping the masonry would confirm so we could stop speculating about this nonsense and get back to playing mafia. whatever. i mean there was a small element of playfulness, but mostly it was helpfulness. especially since i do townread you A50 and want to work with you as we have in the past.
In post 1699, Almost50 wrote:We can work together without making unnecessary gambits (please don't misunderstand me. I LOVE to gambit, and I do it all the time. I just thought this one would have been risky if -say- our third came in and CC'd you. Imagine what scum would do to you, me and sb in that case)
Awkward. I don't see scum coming in and fake claiming here.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:35 am
by Pickaxe Pete
In post 1721, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 1719, Almost50 wrote:
In post 1712, Tayl0r Swift wrote:also why does the gamma wagon, as weak as it seems to be, have such longevity? this gamestate doesnt make sense to me if gamma is scum. here i go defending gamma. i guess i must be scum too. oops.
You are, and so am I.. and a couple more (I don't remember all of them, but I seem to remember DS expressing the same notion). And -by extension- my Mason buddies are also Scum (although I've been trying to convince sb to trust my TR on Gamma). Who else? I guess that's about it. 6-8 scums all on the same team.
seems like a pretty impressive scumteam. i think that theory about 10 scum might not be that far off.
:eek: :eek: :eek:

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:37 am
by Pickaxe Pete
In post 1723, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 1722, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1713, NorwegianboyEE wrote:To be fair, i would gladly switch to Ban Hydras if it became apparent interest in eliminating Gamma was dying.
VOTE: Ban Hydras
I've already expressed why I want to vote here, and I think now is the best time to do it.
oof. big oof. hmm. youre still probably town, but i dont like the vote or the timing.
And you. Why do you have town!gamma?

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:45 am
by superbowl9
Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:46 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
There ARE counterwagons.
Jesus.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:53 am
by DiamondSentinel
In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
There ARE counterwagons.
Jesus.
There were not until they were already at E-3. They’ve been at E-3 for half of this phase.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 5:14 am
by Chemist1422
In post 2336, DiamondSentinel wrote:
In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
There ARE counterwagons.
Jesus.
There were not until they were already at E-3. They’ve been at E-3 for half of this phase.
i don't think that's clearing?

could just be a failure for gamma's partners to be proactively pushing stuff until after they realized he was in trouble

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 5:58 am
by DiamondSentinel
In post 2337, Chemist1422 wrote:
In post 2336, DiamondSentinel wrote:
In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
There ARE counterwagons.
Jesus.
There were not until they were already at E-3. They’ve been at E-3 for half of this phase.
i don't think that's clearing?

could just be a failure for gamma's partners to be proactively pushing stuff until after they realized he was in trouble
/shrug

I wasn't trying to say that gamma should be cleared entirely because of the quick wagon. It screams opportunism and I hate that, but it's more just that I in general don't see gamma as scummy. I'm much more interested in BH right now.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:04 am
by schadd_
shellyc replaces samantha97

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:06 am
by superbowl9
In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
There ARE counterwagons.
Jesus.
Lol i dont agree with this sentiment just reporting back the bs reasons others have given

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:07 am
by Ban Hydras
Oh yay, I do so love having to read through another 32 pages of content.
In post 1592, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1318, Bell wrote:
In post 1316, Gamma Emerald wrote:May I speak my own mind?
Since when did you need permission to do so?
I’d rather ask first if I’m answering a question directed at someone else.
I don’t personally mind hydrae, but these ones are deliberately acting to inflate the thread. I don’t think either on its own is a problem, but they’re making the situation worse together by egging each other on. So I think it will be healthy for the game length for one of them to go. I obviously prefer MM to go but BH can go and I won’t feel too bad about it.
This take is still as shit as the last five people who had it. We're not even the top poster. We've essentially got two heads here and there's plenty of people with more posts than me or Hectic. You personally have more posts than either of us. So does Nero. Superbowl has more than both of us put together. Apparently we're the only ones spamming the thread. Sure.

-Blossom

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:08 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 2339, schadd_ wrote:shellyc replaces samantha97
Oh boy, if you people thought we had a lot of pages, just wait till you see this guy post.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:09 am
by PlusJOYED
In post 2339, schadd_ wrote:shellyc replaces samantha97
jesus christ like we needed more heavy posters

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:10 am
by superbowl9
In post 2343, PlusJOYED wrote:
In post 2339, schadd_ wrote:shellyc replaces samantha97
jesus christ like we needed more heavy posters
True we need more people to lurk and contribute nothing

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:11 am
by PlusJOYED
In post 2335, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 2334, superbowl9 wrote:Because the wagon went too fast and there were no counterwagons
There ARE counterwagons.
Jesus.
yeah ban hydras
I really think there is a strong chance of one of Ban hydras or gamma being scum.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:12 am
by TheGoldenParadox
oml can we get the traditional shelly d1 quicklim

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:14 am
by PlusJOYED
if gamma flips red I'm willing to bet one of the people on ban hydras wagon is red. Currently thinking diamond is the most likely candidate. Him voting immediately after I voted ban hydras felt opportunistic, but thats if gamma flips red

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:16 am
by PlusJOYED
In post 2326, TheGoldenParadox wrote:
intent to l-1
why declare intent for l1
why not just do it

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:17 am
by schadd_
;