Mafiascum.net

In post 2319, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2315, Save The Dragons wrote:Is there any mechanical reason to believe Titus is town

Pretend I skimmed the boring mech part of the game

Furtive claimed VT (as a joke?)
Frog claimed rolecop on furtive got a Joat

Ergo we need to flip Furtive as it’s more likely Furtive is scum than not.

Howwwwwwwww

I'm struggling to buy two town rolecops and Frogsterking being the only ungated claim...

I can buy missing a joke...

In post 2324, Titus wrote:I'm struggling to buy two town rolecops and Frogsterking being the only ungated claim...

I can buy missing a joke...

To borrow someone else’s words “you’re getting too caught up in the mech spec”

The simple answer is Furtive lied
Frog is a rolecop who checked him

OR frog knows Furtive is scum because they’re scumbuddies

Either way given Furtive has no town utility and if scum he would say he’d use his track to stay alive then fuck everything up with Alien it’s too much of a risk.

Plus furtive scum would imply Marci scum.

You and frog can sort each other tomorrow.

But I don't think it's a joke though and I can't put a motive to scum Frogsterking

In post 2326, Titus wrote:But I don't think it's a joke though and I can't put a motive to scum Frogsterking

Then maybe two rolecops exist

We should flip furtive and see what spills out

I feel something is rotten between the two of you but unless you’re advocating for a 1v1 based on nothing between you and Frogger this is meaningless.

It should be furtive today.

In post 2325, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2324, Titus wrote:I'm struggling to buy two town rolecops and Frogsterking being the only ungated claim...

I can buy missing a joke...

To borrow someone else’s words “you’re getting too caught up in the mech spec”

The simple answer is Furtive lied
Frog is a rolecop who checked him

OR frog knows Furtive is scum because they’re scumbuddies

Either way given Furtive has no town utility and if scum he would say he’d use his track to stay alive then fuck everything up with Alien it’s too much of a risk.

Plus furtive scum would imply Marci scum.

You and frog can sort each other tomorrow.

Yes I lied about being VT

In post 2325, MathBlade wrote:Plus furtive scum would imply Marci scum.

literally how

In post 2330, marcistar wrote:

In post 2325, MathBlade wrote:Plus furtive scum would imply Marci scum.

literally how

Furtive if rolecop is believed claimed to have a track.

You claim furtive’s result as your own when furtive was ready to use it.

yeah but im not just tracker

In post 2332, marcistar wrote:yeah but im not just tracker

Then you’ll be given the chance to show that.

It’s why it’s implies not absolute.

I joked about Vig because i thought NM was joking too.

I am also investigative.

I'm serious but I'm stunned nobody really questioned my claim because it's a Day 4 Innocent Child level claim

In post 2335, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm serious but I'm stunned nobody really questioned my claim because it's a Day 4 Innocent Child level claim

I questioned it, I said you were mafia

In post 2335, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm serious but I'm stunned nobody really questioned my claim because it's a Day 4 Innocent Child level claim

I figured you were serious because you offered it up when we were using it to figure out night actions to check BCG and Pooky

You’re a troller but not anti town.

Maria on page 87 is town, so I rescind my suspicion there

In post 2180, MariaR wrote:VCA with no wolf flips- I do not remember you being this impossible to work with but it has been years so that must be it. Your world you're trying to build is based off falsehoods and I'll let everyone else see it for themselves.
pedit: Congrats you figured it out we've won the game woooo

i am correct (this is validation)

In post 2185, MariaR wrote:marcistar/MathBlade/Titus/Not_Mafia
Cape90/Big Chungus Gaming/furtiveglance
Enchant/Save The Dragons/MalcolmTucker
Toogeloo/PookyTheMagicalBear/Frogsterking
pedit: Mafia is that black and white you're totally right. Anything else?

what makes NM at the top here?

In post 2216, Enchant wrote:Not_Mafia - Vigilante
Enchant - Vigilante
Frogsterking - Didn't Claim
MalcolmTucker - Didn't Claim
Big Chungus Gaming - Loyal Bodyguard (Didn't claim actions)

Spoiler: Acts

N1: ???

Save The Dragons - Didn't Claim
furtiveglance - Didn't Claim
PookyTheMagicalBear - Follower

Spoiler: Acts

N1: Titus. Result: Investigative Action

Cape90 - Claims "Not Investigative"
Titus - Didn't Claim
Toogeloo - Claims "Investigative"
MathBlade - Vouyer

Spoiler: Acts

N1: Cape90. Result: No one.

marcistar - Modified Tracker

Spoiler: Acts:

N1: No Action

MariaR - Vanilla Townie

Alisae - Vanilla Townie
kittytacky - Fruit Vendor

Spoiler: Acts

N1: Not_Mafia

Did i miss anything?

thank you for keeping track of this!

In post 2238, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2224, Enchant wrote:furtiveglance - gated, loyal, voyeuristic, investigative Vanilla Townie

VOTE: furtive

I'm

rolecop

and I have a report on furtive which indicates they're some kind of weird roleblocker. I'll dig up the actual report in a second.

I FoS Pooky and BcG. Maybe MathBlade for pushing this dumb plan --which fails to see a single roleblock-- so hard. I wouldn't be sad to see MathBlade killed by a vig. Pooky's claim doesn't fit with my role and Pooky is sus anyway. I also think BcG is sus.

ooh, nice and spicy'

VOTE: furtiveglance

I am ready to participate in the thunderdome between Frog/furtive

In post 2254, Titus wrote:Plot hole, I'm a limited shot rolecop and I investigated MalcolmTucker. Hence why I repeated over and over MalcolmTucker is boring.

2 rolecops huh

right

In post 2258, Titus wrote:I can't trust Frogsterking as much as I used to. Regardless, I can't see scum!Frogster faking a guilty on town!furtiveglance so furtiveglance is still the play.

I don't know how to interpret this game if there are 2 rolecops

VOTE: Titus

This is so ?????????
I don't know what to make of it, like furtive claimed VT, but then just added a bunch of weird modifiers to it.
It would be one thing to just claim regular VT, it baits the night kills to not come after you

In post 2344, Cape90 wrote:

In post 2258, Titus wrote:I can't trust Frogsterking as much as I used to. Regardless, I can't see scum!Frogster faking a guilty on town!furtiveglance so furtiveglance is still the play.

I don't know how to interpret this game if there are 2 rolecops

Me neither.

Mainly I would like to have Pooky checked

I likely die overnight but if likely scum roleblocker dead

Then most likely BCG and Pooky and NM get good results.

Barring an all three scum team besides furtive it’d be pretty straightforward and whoever is town of the rolecops get closer to actual cops.

In post 2342, Cape90 wrote:

In post 2238, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 2224, Enchant wrote:furtiveglance - gated, loyal, voyeuristic, investigative Vanilla Townie

VOTE: furtive

I'm

rolecop

and I have a report on furtive which indicates they're some kind of weird roleblocker. I'll dig up the actual report in a second.

I FoS Pooky and BcG. Maybe MathBlade for pushing this dumb plan --which fails to see a single roleblock-- so hard. I wouldn't be sad to see MathBlade killed by a vig. Pooky's claim doesn't fit with my role and Pooky is sus anyway. I also think BcG is sus.

ooh, nice and spicy'

VOTE: furtiveglance

I am ready to participate in the thunderdome between Frog/furtive

Hey, I'm not counterclaiming, ok? Frog COULD be town. All that happened is I said I was VT AS A JOKE and I'm not.