Page 95 of 123

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:06 am
by Nero Cain
Have you tried saying something useful?

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:09 am
by pidgey
Not really because i just found out i replaced in today at 9 am and havent arrived home.

And i have not read more than the first post of the game and whatever happened since i first posted, which brings me to my point:

Can someone just please tell me in 3 or 4 fucking bulletpoints anything of note that has happened ie claims, lynches, fun facts

Mastin go ahead and vote me rofl after 2 or 3 games ive played with you i expect your stupid nonsense reads anyway that come out of the nowhere anyway.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:10 am
by pidgey
Why did you guys no lynched on d1 :facepalm:

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:10 am
by mastin2
In post 2348, Nero Cain wrote:THIS. IS. MULTIBALL.
Just have to ask, 'cause of the formatting.

What makes you sure that it's multiscum? "whateverhisfirstnamewas Heyman, Heyman-aligned" to me in a normal game would suggest a serial killer, and I only see one kill during the night.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:11 am
by pidgey
Because heyman henchman (lol) and the shield are totally opposite factions in the WWE, it would be incredibly awkward if it wasnt multiball.

More than likely is.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:12 am
by pidgey
N

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:12 am
by mastin2
(Which is important, since it determines whether reading GCBC's iso first is worth it or not. :P Member of a scum faction? Worth it for scumbuddies. Not a scum faction and being a serial killer? Not worth it.)

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:13 am
by pidgey
Not to mention the different flavor deaths.

More than likely the shield (which, now that i think about it, could be either a day SK or a day scum group) are triple bombing people, and cm punk put someone to sleep on the night, which would be with his trademark finisher GTS (Go to sleep)

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:13 am
by Rubicon
GCBC was daykilled.
GCBC's death scene says he was "dropped" by the Shield.

So this is multiball and one scum faction can daykill?

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:14 am
by pidgey
I wonder if, if they are a group rather than a single slot, the shield day kills weaken in some form when we take out one of their members since, you know, you kinda need 3 people to do a triple powerbomb.

All theory until we catch a/the shield

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:15 am
by Mac
In post 2351, pidgey wrote:Not really because i just found out i replaced in today at 9 am and havent arrived home.

And i have not read more than the first post of the game and whatever happened since i first posted, which brings me to my point:

Can someone just please tell me in 3 or 4 fucking bulletpoints anything of note that has happened ie claims, lynches, fun facts

Mastin go ahead and vote me rofl after 2 or 3 games ive played with you i expect your stupid nonsense reads anyway that come out of the nowhere anyway.
- goodcopbadcop killed during day one, flipped heyman scum. flavour tells us shield did it hence multi-ball.
- idiots no lynched d1
- doctor C Niall chap killed n1, he was an (unconfirmed??) innocent child. flavour suggests heyman mafia, specifically cm punk, did it.
- skullduggery day killed day 2, by shield

not entirely sure on claims at the moment.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:16 am
by Rubicon
In post 2359, pidgey wrote:I wonder if, if they are a group rather than a single slot, the shield day kills weaken in some form when we take out one of their members since, you know, you kinda need 3 people to do a triple powerbomb.

All theory until we catch a/the shield
I know nothing about wrestling but this makes a great deal of sense.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:18 am
by mastin2
In post 9, Ravenpaw wrote:That's a cute gimmick AA.

And gawd, we have 6 hydras?!

Vote: MalcolmX


@Nero I like your hydra plan, you can go in my town pile for that.
What do people think of Ravenpaw? Kinda curious, since this post seems like scum.
In post 23, Fuzzyman wrote:
Vote: Jebus


I don't like his meta, and we should have a second wagon to compete with FuDuzn.
This post, however, pretty much IS scum. Syryana really did replace into a scum slot. :P

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:21 am
by Nero Cain
In post 2352, pidgey wrote:Why did you guys no lynched on d1 :facepalm:
'cause the town is full of clowns. Pretty much it came down to a mutlly/Goat day 1 battle. Mut was at L-1 and then Malcolm switched to Goat, Mutley followed suit. Darthe, Petapan and TSQ all voted Goat. Angel, Fuzzy and some other Bozo wasn't voting anyone at that time. Day 2 rolled around and Despo more or less blamed Malcolm for the not lynch.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:23 am
by mastin2
In post 48, Fuzzyman wrote:
Unvote


Vote: Skullduggery


Self-voting is anti-town and a little scummy.
Yup. Syryana's slot is scum. Glad I dodged that bullet. :P

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:23 am
by pidgey
With 21 players I could see the following:

3 man scum group that kills at night consisting of Paul Heyman/CM Punk/Brock Lesnar (very unlikely to be more, but could possibly be 4)
3 man day scum group consisting of the shield, they are potentially doing group kills (Dean, Rollins, Reigns)

And 15 town which would be 71% of the population.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:25 am
by mastin2
In post 60, The Goat wrote:Hi!

Random.org says
vote Desperado.



Discuss.
Yup. Goat's scum.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:26 am
by Mac
i don't think the heyman mafia is more than 3 tbh. there wasnt that 4th guy around when nexus started this so unless he's an ITK then I don't know who the 4th guy could be?

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:27 am
by Nero Cain
I don't think the random.org is a tell 'cause he always does that shit. What I found him incredibly scummy for it claiming that I had a vendetta against him 'cause I made a joke about him in my RVS post.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:28 am
by mastin2
In post 53, Squidward wrote:
In post 34, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Are you softclaiming fandango?
Worst post in the game so far.

VOTE: MonkeyMan576
Penguin might be scum from this.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:28 am
by pidgey
Oh yeah i was thinking of maybe curtis axel.

But yeah i guess this is more than likely 3v3v15

Mmm...

I'll probably look around into the events of the stupid no lynch because they way nero described it, it sounds like a total clusterfuck.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:31 am
by Nero Cain
it was.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:31 am
by ArcAngel9
Nero, here you go...

Scum
Desperado
Mac
PV
MonkeyMan


Neutral
AA
XMALCOLMX
Penguin
Nero
Rubicon
Syryana

Null
Darthe
Mastin2
Ferretlover
Ravenpaw
Mutleyddmc
The Goat
Pidgey


Town
ARCANGEL

And how ironic i find all my most scum suspected in my wagon.... Good example to say scum driven wagon.
Monkey or Despo needs to die.....

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:33 am
by mastin2
In post 83, Nexus wrote:Skullduggery (8)- Krab Bucket, FuDuzn, Skullduggery, Fuzzyman, ferretlover, Jebus, Ravenpaw, Nero Cain
Okay, this seriously has to have scum on it, 'specially given multiball. My guess is on Fuzzy(Syryana), Jebus(pidgey), and Raven.

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:35 am
by Rubicon
I'm kind of seeing scum-Monkey in the early exchange with AA9. The fandango comment wasn't scummy, but the defense ("I was calling him out for breadcrumbing") is weird.
In post 141, ArcAngel9 wrote:Monkey's breadcruming early on Day1 appears like he is trying to fish for town PR's. He usually has a tendency to scum slip (just like the early claims on those games from the links i have provided) When I started asking him about this reason for role-fishing, He attacked me with my meta instead of defending with actual content, That come out really odd as expected. And anywayz, I know that a Town monkey could also possibliy capable of doing something this stupid, all I was waiting for him to come with a proper defence which he clearly didn't do as of this moment.
In post 148, Desperado wrote:You can question the degree to which Monkey was fishing and how scummy it is, but the fact of the matter is he was, by definition, fishing for Duzn's role. The retroactive "It looked like he was posting under role-related restrictions!" justification is completely bogus, and his immediate reaction to arc's comment was to attempt to discredit her by negatively referencing her meta (which itself is not indicative of anything because Arc's meta is all over the place).
These are good points.