Page 95 of 257

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:24 am
by Boem_u_dusi
And what's your current read on Titus? Are you still strongly townreading him?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:24 am
by Dunnstral
Yes, I very strongly oppose that lynch

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:25 am
by Almost50
Here's the entire ISO of PV. His 25 posts thus far. Yes he does have reads, which could very well have been composed to mimic the most popular reads with little to no adjustment. Where and how did he reach these reads? What actual scum hunting/engagement did he provide?

I COULD blame it on the silly number of posts, I really could.. but having detailed reads at the same time is very odd to me. He either can't keep up thus should have vague reads or he IS following up so he should have much more content.

GDI! I edited out like a gazillion winks and it still says "Your message contains too many smilies". You guys ISO Peregrine on your own!!

@PV:

Is this a trick to prevent someone from quoting your whole ISO?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:27 am
by Dunnstral
Just don't quote post 64......

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:27 am
by Boem_u_dusi
In post 2351, Dunnstral wrote:Yes, I very strongly oppose that lynch
I wasn't talking about lynch.

And please answer my question before Titus one.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:31 am
by Dunnstral
In post 2349, Boem_u_dusi wrote:
In post 2348, Dunnstral wrote:Vedith might be town after all
Yeah, I figured you made that conclusion. But why? Do you think Performer is trying to deflect there or what?
I never said anything about performer?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:34 am
by Boem_u_dusi
In post 2355, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 2349, Boem_u_dusi wrote:
In post 2348, Dunnstral wrote:Vedith might be town after all
Yeah, I figured you made that conclusion. But why? Do you think Performer is trying to deflect there or what?
I never said anything about performer?
OK, whatever, forget Performer :facepalm: .
Do you think *someone* is trying to deflect from Sickofit and that made you change vote to him? Or you have another reasons?
Provide me with some of your thoughts, pretty please with sugar on top.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:43 am
by Dunnstral
Vedith might just be dumb town

Like don't get me wrong I wouldn't mind lynching him knowing he's town

But I'd prefer to get sickofit who scums it up then says nothing for all of 2000 posts

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:54 am
by Wake1
In post 2357, Dunnstral wrote:Vedith might just be dumb town

Like don't get me wrong I wouldn't mind lynching him knowing he's town
I'm curious how many times you've flip-flopped today. Also, the second sentence is bad.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:55 am
by Boem_u_dusi
In post 2357, Dunnstral wrote:Vedith might just be dumb town

Like don't get me wrong I wouldn't mind lynching him knowing he's town

But I'd prefer to get sickofit who scums it up then says nothing for all of 2000 posts
Image

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:00 am
by Boem_u_dusi
Whatever.

VOTE: Sickofit1138

Good night.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:08 am
by GuyInFreezer
Prod prod


vc 1.18
Titus (6):
AGar, Vedith, podoboq, shannon, Lapsa, Varsoon
PeregrineV (1):
Almost50
Vedith (4):
Transcend, implosion, Titus, Zachstralkita
Wake88 (1):
Sickofit1138
shannon (1):
Mirhawk
Almost50 (1):
PeregrineV
Varsoon (1):
Airick10
Sickofit1138 (2):
Dunnstral, Boem_u_dusi

Not Voting:
Wake88, Performer


With
19
votes,
10
to lynch.
Deadline: (expired on 2016-07-05 23:38:55)


Wake88 is
V/LA
until
7/4
.


Sickofit1138
has been prodded.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:53 am
by AGar
Fuck it. I haven't been impressed by Vedith and you fucks are going to let Titus off the hook.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Vedith

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:02 pm
by Airick10
In post 2334, Zachstralkita wrote: I'll go back to it but Performer is viable scum. Remember this.
I'm curious on what your scum read is on Performer. Because I don't see it.
In post 2358, Wake1 wrote:
In post 2357, Dunnstral wrote:Vedith might just be dumb town

Like don't get me wrong I wouldn't mind lynching him knowing he's town
I'm curious how many times you've flip-flopped today. Also, the second sentence is bad.
Absolutely agree with this.

In post 2362, AGar wrote:Fuck it. I haven't been impressed by Vedith and you fucks are going to let Titus off the hook.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Vedith
I've seen too much of this talk recently. How exactly is Titus being let off the hook here? Doesn't she STILL have the most votes even with your vote on Vedith? In fact, you just took your vote off Titus. Aren't you letting her off the hook yourself?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:03 pm
by Airick10
To clarify, I agree with both Wake's points on Dunn.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:13 pm
by Almost50
@AGar:

You've just been relegated to a null read on my list, mate. You leave a L-4 wagon (which I do not approve of) to join a L-6 wagon, making then L-5 both, and you accuse others of letting the wagon you quit decimate?!! :eek:

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:23 pm
by AGar
In post 2365, Almost50 wrote:@AGar:

You've just been relegated to a null read on my list, mate. You leave a L-4 wagon (which I do not approve of) to join a L-6 wagon, making then L-5 both, and you accuse others of letting the wagon you quit decimate?!! :eek:
Multiple vocal players have said they will not lynch Titus/Dunn today. Maybe you don't understand the dynamics of a large game, but on D1 if vocal players who have held any bit of sway (or just spammed the fuck out of the thread) say they will not lynch a player, that player almost certainly doesn't get lynched. So you have to learn to consolidate, and we have virtually 0 information on half of this game at this point.

Also, deary fucking me, I'm a "null" oh noooooooooooooooooooo

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:34 pm
by Airick10
As transcend said posts ago... we are at 100 posts on D1. Clearly the vocal players have not been able to convince the town to lynch anyone. In fact, as A50 puts it (my math was wrong) you left a L-4 to join a L-6. Who is convincing you to vote on the smaller wagon? The whole game you've been on Titus, now you switch? Your vote screams emotion and no logic. I also sense following a hot wagon just to do it.

Unvote

Vote: Agar

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:42 pm
by Almost50
I could follow that, tbh. At least I'd know exactly why I'm doing it.

VOTE: AGar

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:59 pm
by Dunnstral
VOTE: Almost50

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:00 pm
by Almost50
I wouldn't have expected anything less from the guy who votes anything that moves!

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:06 pm
by Titus
VOTE: Agar

I can so get on board with Agar wagon.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:09 pm
by Varsoon
I'm actually with AGar on this one.

Outside of Titus/Dunnstral? My reads are shit, mate. I've not been focusing on things outside of Titus/Dunnstral.
I think it's bothersome how much resistance there is to getting any wagon beyond six votes in this game, though.
Even players who look absolutely scummy (Dunnstral, Titus, Vedith, Sickofit) just have wagons that get stalled out.
The amount of vote-hoping and vote-holding that's happening bothers me.
We're 100 pages in. We shouldn't have six minor 1-or-2 vote wagons.
We need to consolidate and focus.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:18 pm
by Zachstralkita
An AGar wagon is possibly the worst fucking idea you've had yet

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:24 pm
by Dunnstral
I don't want to lynch Agar, can we please just get sickofit?

VOTE: Sickofit