Mafiascum.net

In post 2345, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so why wouldnt we elim NPOM?

Huh?

I recant, even repudiate, my earlier NPOM scumread. I was wrong.

In post 2334, NoPowerOverMe wrote:@DGB: We're probably two of the older players in the game. Sorry you're scum.

Old - check
Scum - no check

In post 2344, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like the quips at the bottom of your posts only serve to be inflammatory
They're not adding anything, they're purely just reactive commentary, and it's not nice stuff

Yet, it is those very quips that are at the basis of my game crush on Looker.

Read List Part 3

Almost50
*Says "he knows" drew is 3P for voting IKS
*Likes to comment on others reads rather than have reads himself
*Trusts rude on NPOM
*Says NPOM is town mindset
TR: Rude
Vote: Galon, IKS
My Read: Talks to a lot of different players. Doesn't vote often or give reads. Seems town for now.

pisskop
*Asks a lot of mechanical questions
*Townread NPOM Wagon
*Pressed NPOM on if his claim would lead to his elimination
*Role is stylized.
*Says NPOM ways not a policy elimination.
Vote: Leia, IKS, TD, Drew, Walter, NPOM, IKS, Walter, Lavender
SR: TD, Bambi, Walter, Dave, TR: Gamma, rude, Dave
My Read: Lots of dialogue and lots of stances. Probably town.

Looker:
*Dislikes NPOM's self vote
*Likes to insult people
*Very confrontational
TR: Gamma
Vote: Titus, looker, Drew, TD, Dave, A50, Walter, Lav, TD, NPOM, Walter
My Read: Seems to be extremely agressive and likes LHF. Scum.

Iecerint
*Made a readlist early in the first day. It looks better now than it did initially.
*Stayed on the NPOM wagon and was reluctant to switch to IKC.
*Keeps on jester speculating for no reason.
*Was very reactionary to my push on him.
TR: Galron, Piss, Starbuck SR: NPOM/IKS/Walter
Vote: NPOM
TR: Leia
My read: Not really scumhunting. No ability to adjust to game state. Scum.

Doctor Drew
*Likes sheeping Titus.
*Says NPOM is "superficially scummy." and that he shouldn't be lynched, then hard pushes him.
*Criticized Chk for defending IKS
*I criticized Goof, Ice and Drew for not sorting and he said I was only "saying how townie I thought I was."
*Says he doesn't like LAL(lynch a lurker I assume)
SR: Leia, Dave TR: Starbuck, Looker
Vote: DGB, IKS, Leia, IKS, Nono, IKS, NPOM, Lavender
My read: I don't like his read progressions and he seems very willing to flip flop. Leaning scum.

In post 2353, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 2344, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like the quips at the bottom of your posts only serve to be inflammatory
They're not adding anything, they're purely just reactive commentary, and it's not nice stuff

Yet, it is those very quips that are at the basis of my game crush on Looker.

why? does it mean anything for his alignment, if so, why?

@CHK at this point I feel like you're being contrarian/confrontational. You and IKS are/were filibustering in different ways, IKS mucked up the game with nonsense, you're hard-redirecting the energy of the game. And again, don't like you trying to imply you had any part in the push against IKS, at least at any of the key points. You yourself admitted you didn't have an idea of what lavender's scumgame looks like, so I think you can't really blast me for disregarding your points about her towngame. And if you don't mean rudeboy who DO you mean?

In post 2355, Gamma Emerald wrote:why? does it mean anything for his alignment, if so, why?

I read it as town.

In post 2355, Gamma Emerald wrote:@CHK at this point I feel like you're being contrarian/confrontational.

That's not necessarily scum, but with chkflip, it feels like Tasmanian Devil levels of unproductive confrontation.

hmmmmm, I know ya'll dont like spec, but I do.

Bring Kuribo in here!

In post 2360, pisskop wrote:Bring Kuribo in here!

+1

In post 2357, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 2355, Gamma Emerald wrote:@CHK at this point I feel like you're being contrarian/confrontational.

That's not necessarily scum, but with chkflip, it feels like Tasmanian Devil levels of unproductive confrontation.

I'm the same way wrt it being a scum thing generally, but it feels like he's trying to redirect from something, which makes him probable scum.
idk what you mean by Tazmanian Devil though

Let the mod handle the mods job.

is that regarding spec or suggesting people to rep in?

Mellenials...

Who gets replaced in.

I think it's totally okay to try to bring in people you think would want to play. It's been done plenty in the past.

I don't want scum to gain an advantage based on suggesting replace one.

In

????


If people can WotC in sign-ups, why cant we group-think a replacement?

This is a weird tangent, NPOM.

Kuribo's spectating though, it's just jokes NPOM!

Just my opinion. Disregard if you don't agree.

Should players have a say in mod level decisions? No. Does really matter that much in this case? No.