In post 1627, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yes but think about the players that make up that hydra. Is there a reason to think it’s actually a scum move to do that for any of them?
Flopz doesn't co-ordinate that much in scum PT's. And i assume not in hydra PT's either.
I don't care much for assigning town or scum equity to that post as it's really not alignment indicative.
Where have you played with Flopz? I didn't think Flopz had played any games I wasn't aware of as scum.
In post 1713, NorwegianboyEE wrote:To be fair, i would gladly switch to Ban Hydras if it became apparent interest in eliminating Gamma was dying.
thats also a dumb wagon.
"oooh i dont like hydrae, therefore this hydra must be scum!!!"
"theyre posting too much!"
"they posted about language policing rather than whos scum this one time!"
"shut up loudmouth"
i feel like im decent at sorting the people in that hydra, and i feel like i can sort them as town here.
I think the best one I can read in it is Hop, and his posting is relatively inoffensive. However I think they're still a good vote because of what I've seen from the other two.
Let me put this out now, this will be expanded on later. I have 3 sets of "will vote" brackets in this game. One for scumreads, one for people who I don't townread and I think voting them out improves game health, and one that is the intersection between those two. Originally BH was in the second bracket listed there, but they've moved into the third at this point. I'll eventually put out where all of my scumread/acceptable votes our within this, but for now I'll say MM is in the scumreads that improve game health if they're eliminated, and Menalque is in the scumread only section.
So you dislike the other two. Why do you dislike Flopz who'd made two posts, one about objectively non game related stuff and one that he made in response to me and Hectic repeatedly saying 'just make a meme entrance post, you don't need to read all forty pages for that'. I don't see how you could possibly have an issue with that head for serious reason.
In post 1778, Gamma Emerald wrote:If it was it would lean towards that, it just feels like a scripted lecture
Like, it just seems like Flopz is trying to tell everyone off, the actual constructive thing imo would have been to try to be understanding and guiding
Given you scumread it for being 'IIOA', how exactly would changing the delivery that have made literally any difference in how alignment indiciative you read it as? This feels like you're saying 'well if he'd done x instead then my read would change' when x is functionally the exact same in terms of the thing you said you didn't like about it.
-Blossom
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:30 am
by Chemist1422
hey gamma can you answer my questions from last night
In post 2359, Menalque wrote:just poweryeet gamma, I don't believe that claim at all
?
doesn't particularly move the needle for me either way
what's your issue with it
given what else has been revealed about the setup I find gamma's claim deeply unbelievable, I don't think it gels well at all
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:41 am
by Menalque
it's also, like, an incredibly convenient claim for scum to make that doesn't tie them into anything too hard but is potentially a strong enough claim to buy them a day
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:42 am
by Menalque
POWERYEET TIME BAY-BEE
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:43 am
by Titus
I have minor reservations but wagonomics and extreme defensiveness from Gamma seems like this is the execution for the day. The claim from Gamma is scummy and designed to buy him another day.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:44 am
by Menalque
POWERYEET
POWERYEET
say it with me now
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:45 am
by Menalque
where dem two more votes at, I want a flip before I get home from the market
Given Samantha clearly intentionally used the word immediately after Flopz post, I don't get any AI vibes from the replace out, maybe leaning more town than anything.