Mafiascum.net

Probably a lot more, like people are wanting a lot less from me.

Probably a lot more, like people are wanting a lot less from me.

haha i can tell you really wanted that pagetop Flea

VOTE: Titus

In post 2326, Flea The Magician wrote:chaos has no place here apparently and honestly I'm debating rule 1.

fyi follow your heart on this because for a good while I treated playing mafia as a bit of a civic duty but it eventually mutated into a chore to the point where last year around christmas time I had a big realization regarding that and fled the site
So like, do what you think you need to do in order to enjoy yourself, don't worry about "seeing the game through" or w/e

FYI I'm a swing vote that can do either (HC or Titus)

swing this way

get one more and I will

In post 2348, Battle Mage wrote:i believe you believe your own case. Clearly, on it's merits, I don't. I don't know what more you want from me...

I want an honest attempt at reading what my reasoning is rather than what you did.

Do you agree with the night plan at least?

So I still don't see actual good reasoning for a Titus vote.

And I really don't like Haschel's response to me, it's a lot of sound and fury and condescension but doesn't really address anything.

Why is Pooky not here? He didn't know I had the plan part covered.

Can we not not vote people because we can't draw associatives?
I can vote Titus just so we elim.
I really think we should elim.
Also HC only showing up when his neck is on the line is telling imo.
Not sure how BM is vibing with that tbh.
Btw, who said that Akarin is being abrasive?
I don't see that either.
Nor am I sure that it matters.

In post 2347, MURDERCAT wrote:Not sure who HC could be scum with

BM? Flea? You?

Fuck.

I agree with assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a flip.
I feel like sole-minded focus on is still really weird.
I don't like last minute rally to lim even though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree with perception of reply, is a townread for several of my townreads.

Akarin is being commanding, I would say she's abrasive rn

In post 2358, Akarin wrote:

In post 2348, Battle Mage wrote:i believe you believe your own case. Clearly, on it's merits, I don't. I don't know what more you want from me...

I want an honest attempt at reading what my reasoning is rather than what you did.

Do you agree with the night plan at least?

lol honesty is what you got. I think what you actually want is for me to kiss your butt and pretend you had a good case on HC

I am supportive of the night plan, even though it consigns me to the least fun PT ever.

In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.

I agree with

BM's

assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a

Titus

flip.
I feel like

Haschel's

sole-minded focus on

Titus

is still really weird.
I don't like

TGP's

last minute rally to lim

Haschel

even though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree with

Akarin's

perception of

Haschel's

reply,

Titus

is a townread for several of my townreads.

how are you weighing these rn?

In post 2361, Blitzo wrote:I really think we should elim.

Why though?

In post 2361, Blitzo wrote:Can we not not vote people because we can't draw associatives?
I can vote Titus just so we elim.
I really think we should elim.
Also HC only showing up when his neck is on the line is telling imo.
Not sure how BM is vibing with that tbh.
Btw, who said that Akarin is being abrasive?
I don't see that either.
Nor am I sure that it matters.

I love that, a couple hours ago Blitzo was complaining that people were scum for not being here. Now he's claiming people are scum for turning up. Is your gimmick just to claim you don't understand anything anyone says or does, but nonetheless continually tell me I'm wrong about everything?

In post 2365, Battle Mage wrote:lol honesty is what you got. I think what you actually want is for me to kiss your butt and pretend you had a good case on HC

I am supportive of the night plan, even though it consigns me to the least fun PT ever.

I don't want you to kiss my butt but I feel like you read a bizarro universe version of my post and I don't understand how you got what you got from it. Like it didn't read like you disagreed on the merits, it read like a response to some other post that doesn't exist.

Sorry your PT is no fun.

In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.

I agree with

BM's

assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a

Titus

flip.
I feel like

Haschel's

sole-minded focus on

Titus

is still really weird.
I don't like

TGP's

last minute rally to lim

Haschel

even though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree with

Akarin's

perception of

Haschel's

reply,

Titus

is a townread for several of my townreads.

question for you Taly - is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.

In post 2363, Taly wrote:I agree with BM's assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a Titus flip.

Up to you Taly, if you think you can go off and solve the game off the back of a Titus flip then say so
But right now it feels like we are floundering to me

Pooky not being here is definitely suspect.
It fits with his modus operandi from last game of only popping in when his neck was on the line.
It was extremely apparent towards EoD of day 1 and this sort of mirrors that.
Pedit - Okay I guess but is that really a bad thing?
Above @Gamma ofc.
PEDIT 2 - BM that is a blatant misrepresentation of the points I'm making.

In post 2366, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.

I agree with

BM's

assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a

Titus

flip.
I feel like

Haschel's

sole-minded focus on

Titus

is still really weird.
I don't like

TGP's

last minute rally to lim

Haschel

even though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree with

Akarin's

perception of

Haschel's

reply,

Titus

is a townread for several of my townreads.

how are you weighing these rn?

Consequences of or potential townflip. I agree with , I have issue finding in a specific solve right now.

I will say, I'm good with the night plan.

Battle Mage wrote:

In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.

I agree with

BM's

assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a

Titus

flip.
I feel like

Haschel's

sole-minded focus on

Titus

is still really weird.
I don't like

TGP's

last minute rally to lim

Haschel

even though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree with

Akarin's

perception of

Haschel's

reply,

Titus

is a townread for several of my townreads.

question for you Taly - is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.

And to play devil's advocate, is it accurate to say you've focused a lot on D1?

In post 2369, Akarin wrote:

In post 2365, Battle Mage wrote:lol honesty is what you got. I think what you actually want is for me to kiss your butt and pretend you had a good case on HC

I am supportive of the night plan, even though it consigns me to the least fun PT ever.

I don't want you to kiss my butt but I feel like you read a bizarro universe version of my post and I don't understand how you got what you got from it. Like it didn't read like you disagreed on the merits, it read like a response to some other post that doesn't exist.

Sorry your PT is no fun.

as i say, i'm comfortable believing you're town and just not being able to see past your personal feelings towards Haschel on this one. i've been there too.