Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:48 am
Vote Count 2-2
Search function says no match found for hisIn post 2351, Dunnstral wrote:I ctrl + f'd "hid" and that was the only post that showed up
How about a claim from M&M considering they were weird about their claim earlier and there is no need to try to bait a kill anymore?In post 2344, Towelie wrote:Absolutely not we are sorting this firstIn post 2341, Dunnstral wrote:I've been pushing bears all game pretty much. You should vote for Wisdom if you believe this. Or we can ignore the hider stuff and just get bears today, I'd do that.In post 2338, Towelie wrote:Yeah it’s 100% not critter
I do think it’s in (Dunn, Wisdom) 100% of the time here.
I still think last scum is that bad bad bear.
-b
This does check out. You still ping me thoughIn post 2355, Dunnstral wrote:ctrl + f on the iso
I think mass PR vs not PR claim would be good.In post 2354, Dunnstral wrote:How about a claim from M&M considering they were weird about their claim earlier and there is no need to try to bait a kill anymore?In post 2344, Towelie wrote:Absolutely not we are sorting this firstIn post 2341, Dunnstral wrote:I've been pushing bears all game pretty much. You should vote for Wisdom if you believe this. Or we can ignore the hider stuff and just get bears today, I'd do that.In post 2338, Towelie wrote:Yeah it’s 100% not critter
I do think it’s in (Dunn, Wisdom) 100% of the time here.
I still think last scum is that bad bad bear.
-b
This to me is a crumb.In post 2300, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:This could also potentially point to hiding behind Dunnstral: "I can get behind this", but the problem with this as a crumb is he goes on to say "I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow", indicating he's favoring LLD, who doesnt make sense as a target. I feel that if this post were meant as a crumb, it would have been worded more carefully so it could not be misinterpreted. There's even potential here that there's some kind of EMMI crumb toward the end if this post. This post is too unclear to be a crumb, so I'm going to assume it was not one, and "getting behind" something is not a crumb on the same level as "hiding behind" something as a Hider crumb.In post 2051, Something_Smart wrote:I can get behind this.
It's quite unfortunate that two people I respect are disagreeing so heavily, but I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow.
Also, I think I agree with the reads here-- I can follow the town reasoning for SM, but Emmi not so much. But of course it's entirely possible LLD sees something I don't.
I don't think that helps us, gamma already has his targets, right? This would just make unrelated people claim info for very little gain. Unless you just want to mass claim.In post 2357, Critter wrote:I think mass PR vs not PR claim would be good.
This post thoughIn post 2308, Dunnstral wrote:Spoiler:
Quoting this because he also says "behind Kyo" here, just to show that it is unfortunate wording rather than an intentional crumb on his part. It's just the way he speaks.
That doesn't make sense, what he quoted isn't related to hiding or night actions or anything.Wisdom wrote: Maybe Im reading too much into it but maybe the omission was so it would be made clearer that it's a crumb.
Plan still works long as we nail scumIn post 2314, Wisdom wrote:Dont get too invested in your planning because Im not scumIn post 2276, Critter wrote:(This is all assuming Wisdom is scum)
No. I said what I said for a reasonIn post 2360, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think that helps us, gamma already has his targets, right? This would just make unrelated people claim info for very little gain. Unless you just want to mass claim.In post 2357, Critter wrote:I think mass PR vs not PR claim would be good.
What about it? I don’t see how that relates and it wasn’t made anywhere near EoDIn post 2361, Dunnstral wrote:This post thoughIn post 2308, Dunnstral wrote:Spoiler:
Quoting this because he also says "behind Kyo" here, just to show that it is unfortunate wording rather than an intentional crumb on his part. It's just the way he speaks.
That doesn't make sense, what he quoted isn't related to hiding or night actions or anything.Wisdom wrote: Maybe Im reading too much into it but maybe the omission was so it would be made clearer that it's a crumb.
The way to convince me this isn’t a crumb is to find the better one.In post 2051, Something_Smart wrote:I can get behind this.
It's quite unfortunate that two people I respect are disagreeing so heavily, but I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow.
Also, I think I agree with the reads here-- I can follow the town reasoning for SM, but Emmi not so much. But of course it's entirely possible LLD sees something I don't.
Why?In post 2366, Wisdom wrote:Unless we lim the blocker I dont think we're getting gamma checks
That’s not an incorrect assumption though lolIn post 2367, Dunnstral wrote:I think you are under the assumption that being "later" makes it more viable, but I don't believe that is the way S_S operates. I think he sets his crumbs early.
It’s shit like that that makes me want to elim you.In post 2366, Wisdom wrote:Unless we lim the blocker I dont think we're getting gamma checks
Something_Smart wrote:It's not a clear crumb. It doesn't mean it's not a starting point. But it's not like "I could get behind SS" or "I'll be looking into SS overnight" level clear.
Like this defense from Kyo is like stretching pasta noodles to the point of breaking badly.In post 2359, Critter wrote:This to me is a crumb.In post 2300, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:This could also potentially point to hiding behind Dunnstral: "I can get behind this", but the problem with this as a crumb is he goes on to say "I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow", indicating he's favoring LLD, who doesnt make sense as a target. I feel that if this post were meant as a crumb, it would have been worded more carefully so it could not be misinterpreted. There's even potential here that there's some kind of EMMI crumb toward the end if this post. This post is too unclear to be a crumb, so I'm going to assume it was not one, and "getting behind" something is not a crumb on the same level as "hiding behind" something as a Hider crumb.In post 2051, Something_Smart wrote:I can get behind this.
It's quite unfortunate that two people I respect are disagreeing so heavily, but I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow.
Also, I think I agree with the reads here-- I can follow the town reasoning for SM, but Emmi not so much. But of course it's entirely possible LLD sees something I don't.
Yeah i concedeIn post 2371, Wisdom wrote:Hey hey I think this will convince you for certain
Subject: Undertale Mafia (Endgame):
Something_Smart wrote:It's not a clear crumb. It doesn't mean it's not a starting point. But it's not like "I could get behind SS" or "I'll be looking into SS overnight" level clear.