Both crumbs look legit? The Ythan is mafia AND the Om is SK?
the om one isn't a crumb. It's a question. Not a good question, but with two ythan = mafia crumbs in your first three posts of the day it's pretty obvious what he's doing once you see them.
↑DeltaWave wrote:If Ythan doesn't flip scum then Pdra is dead as shit for faking a guilty.
He can say he was bus driven or some other nonsense.
In that case, it's far more likely to be a lie. The only other alternative is that scum got incredibly lucky on N1.
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:31 am
by One Direction
Are we seriously wasting page space on this dumb argument? P-dra gets autolynched tomorrow if Ythan comes back town (he won't, refer back to my question to DGB earlier).
(Friendly reminder that DGB and Zoraster are still obvious scum.)
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:35 am
by Bella
Oh sweet, sheeping Fate leads to voting for scum.
BAAAA!
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:38 am
by zoraster
↑vollkan wrote:Tentative +7 on Zoraster in the event that Ythan is scum. The reason for this that Zoraster has avoided actually stating a position one way or the other on the claim, and has instead just questioned the manner in which it was made
yes. because all positions must be arrived at immediately and stated loudly, especially and even if it comes from someone who I would suspect of shenanigans even as town. Lining up lynches for this lame reason? scummy.
anyway, my vote will be on ythan once he decides to post.
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:39 am
by DrippingGoofball
↑One Direction wrote:Are we seriously wasting page space on this dumb argument? P-dra gets autolynched tomorrow if Ythan comes back town (he won't, refer back to my question to DGB earlier).
(Friendly reminder that DGB and Zoraster are still obvious scum.)
Ythan's lack of response is re-assuring that we're on the right track.
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:40 am
by DrippingGoofball
↑Bella wrote:Oh sweet, sheeping Fate leads to voting for scum.
BAAAA!
State your position on Ythan.
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:43 am
by One Direction
↑zoraster wrote:yes. because all positions must be arrived at immediately and stated loudly, especially and even if it comes from someone who I would suspect of shenanigans even as town. Lining up lynches for this lame reason? scummy.
anyway, my vote will be on ythan once he decides to post.
↑One Direction wrote:I want someone to create a graph that plots the correlation between the frequency of Zoraster's posting and other people's mentioning of him.
↑vollkan wrote:Tentative +7 on Zoraster in the event that Ythan is scum. The reason for this that Zoraster has avoided actually stating a position one way or the other on the claim, and has instead just questioned the manner in which it was made
yes. because all positions must be arrived at immediately and stated loudly, especially and even if it comes from someone who I would suspect of shenanigans even as town. Lining up lynches for this lame reason? scummy.
↑vollkan wrote:Tentative +7 on Zoraster in the event that Ythan is scum. The reason for this that Zoraster has avoided actually stating a position one way or the other on the claim, and has instead just questioned the manner in which it was made
yes. because all positions must be arrived at immediately and stated loudly, especially and even if it comes from someone who I would suspect of shenanigans even as town. Lining up lynches for this lame reason? scummy.
Scummy
That's actually one of zoraster's less scummy post. Why do you find it scummy? I'd like to know.
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:11 am
by BT
↑DrippingGoofball wrote:
That's actually one of zoraster's less scummy post. Why do you find it scummy? I'd like to know.
The first part's tone suggests scum, but I guess that's up for debate. Though there's also how he explains to vollkan why the point is bad, as in, it wasn't expected of him to know that, but then proceeds to call it scummy.