Mafiascum.net

In post 2372, OnTheMark wrote:Can we like not?

Seriously I get yelled at for asking for clarity so let’s NOT have another discussion where people ignore the original points and nitpick to suit their agendas.

We know what Creature is saying please move on.

I didn't know what he was saying, and I still don't know what he's saying, because he won't simply rephrase to make things clear. I can *assume* that he means he disagrees that Micc sounds genuine, but I shouldn't have to make an assumption when instead of making a post about his ability to use commas, he could have said "I don't think Micc sounds genuine."

It's shitty, unconstructive behavior.

-Cerb

-_-

That's how to get engaged into the game.

Creature I want my question answered

Creature doesn't think Micc sounds genuine.
i also haven't read, i was just here for semantics.

I'd like you to be engaged, and I'd also like you to speak clearly so I don't have to come back and retread all the points you've made to ensure I understood you correctly.

@Creature: Why isn't Gamma on your list of forgotten people?

-Cerb

cerb why are you unnecessarily ripping into creature over semantics -_-

i ask because i don't see any intention behind it other than to post "content"

In post 2381, Venmar wrote:cerb why are you unnecessarily ripping into creature over semantics -_-

i ask because i don't see any intention behind it other than to post "content"

Venmar, I don't need to "pretend" to post content.

I'm ripping into him because of the flippant response he gave to my request for clarification. It annoyed me, and it was a shitty thing to do.

-Cerb

In post 2382, Reasonably Rational wrote:

In post 2381, Venmar wrote:cerb why are you unnecessarily ripping into creature over semantics -_-

i ask because i don't see any intention behind it other than to post "content"

Venmar, I don't need to "pretend" to post content.

I'm ripping into him because of the flippant response he gave to my request for clarification. It annoyed me, and it was a shitty thing to do.

-Cerb

Assume it’s shitty.

Is it alignment indicative?

If not talk with him post game.

Otherwise it’s unwanted coaching which generally only pisses the person off.

In post 2371, Gamma Emerald wrote:Dunnstral has been a point of contention in certain circles

tell me more

i think most people understood that 2360 was creature saying that he disagreed with the idea of micc being genuine. the "ughh" telegraphs his tone from a mile away.

why did you feel the need to nitpick his grammar? there's literally no point in doing so. you're causing a commotion for no reason at all and it's distracting, and i don't know how to read it anymore

I just realized there is no VC that shows votes on my slot right now, but I'm sure people *have* voted me, it's just nobody has voted me with enough belief that I'm the best choice to lynch, or that the wagon will go anywhere, to actually keep their vote on long enough for it to show up in a VC.

That's pretty entertaining to me.

And no, Venmar, this is not content, just an observation.

-Cerb

pedit: Fair point OTM. I don't believe I've ever seen Creature respond to me asking him a simple question in such a fashion, so yes, it's out of character for him, and could indeed be AI. Do I know in what way it's AI, or am I certain it's AI? No.

In post 2385, Venmar wrote:i think most people understood that 2360 was creature saying that he disagreed with the idea of micc being genuine. the "ughh" telegraphs his tone from a mile away.

why did you feel the need to nitpick his grammar? there's literally no point in doing so. you're causing a commotion for no reason at all and it's distracting, and i don't know how to read it anymore

I did not know for certain which of the two possibilities he meant. I believed he meant he disagreed with the idea of Micc being genuine, but I wasn't certain. Rather than make an assumption about the position he was holding, I asked. His response was bad. I nitpicked his grammar because I felt like it.

I'm not here to make things easy for you to read Venmar, so you not knowing "how to read it anymore" isn't particularly concerning.

-Cerb

I am also well aware that I'm being a bit of an ass here. It's deliberate.

Venmar's attitude in relation to my slot is deserving of a harsh tone.

I still love you all and wish you the best.

<3

Can we talk about something that matters now?

-Cerb

In post 2386, Reasonably Rational wrote:I just realized there is no VC that shows votes on my slot right now, but I'm sure people *have* voted me, it's just nobody has voted me with enough belief that I'm the best choice to lynch, or that the wagon will go anywhere, to actually keep their vote on long enough for it to show up in a VC.

this is debatable

though cerb might be best to be tabled as a lynch prospect until at least day 2 so he can at least try to prove that his play becomes more "protown" after d1.

:thinking emoji:

In post 2387, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'm not here to make things easy for you to read Venmar, so you not knowing "how to read it anymore" isn't particularly concerning.

to be fair i just tend to say shit. im still forming an opinion here regardless

cerb i'd like an update on your read on me

In post 2389, Venmar wrote:

In post 2386, Reasonably Rational wrote:I just realized there is no VC that shows votes on my slot right now, but I'm sure people *have* voted me, it's just nobody has voted me with enough belief that I'm the best choice to lynch, or that the wagon will go anywhere, to actually keep their vote on long enough for it to show up in a VC.

this is debatable

though cerb might be best to be tabled as a lynch prospect until at least day 2 so he can at least try to prove that his play becomes more "protown" after d1.

:thinking emoji:

In post 2387, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'm not here to make things easy for you to read Venmar, so you not knowing "how to read it anymore" isn't particularly concerning.

to be fair i just tend to say shit. im still forming an opinion here regardless

cerb i'd like an update on your read on me

My tone/attitude/presence is never protown.

My actions/the intent behind what I say/do?

More protown than anyone else's, always, regardless of alignment. Mastina had that right about Drixx and I.

You're still irrelevant to me Venmar, because I never went back to read your ISO in it's entirety.

-Cerb

In post 2380, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'd like you to be engaged, and I'd also like you to speak clearly so I don't have to come back and retread all the points you've made to ensure I understood you correctly.

@Creature: Why isn't Gamma on your list of forgotten people?

-Cerb

Gamma isn't forgotten, atleast for me.

In post 2391, Creature wrote:

In post 2380, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'd like you to be engaged, and I'd also like you to speak clearly so I don't have to come back and retread all the points you've made to ensure I understood you correctly.

@Creature: Why isn't Gamma on your list of forgotten people?

-Cerb

Gamma isn't forgotten, atleast for me.

Got it, so the people you listed were ones that you felt you had to go back and look at more, not people that you felt the thread had forgotten.

K.

-Cerb

In post 2390, Reasonably Rational wrote:

In post 2389, Venmar wrote:

In post 2386, Reasonably Rational wrote:I just realized there is no VC that shows votes on my slot right now, but I'm sure people *have* voted me, it's just nobody has voted me with enough belief that I'm the best choice to lynch, or that the wagon will go anywhere, to actually keep their vote on long enough for it to show up in a VC.

this is debatable

though cerb might be best to be tabled as a lynch prospect until at least day 2 so he can at least try to prove that his play becomes more "protown" after d1.

:thinking emoji:

In post 2387, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'm not here to make things easy for you to read Venmar, so you not knowing "how to read it anymore" isn't particularly concerning.

to be fair i just tend to say shit. im still forming an opinion here regardless

cerb i'd like an update on your read on me

My tone/attitude/presence is never protown.

My actions/the intent behind what I say/do?

More protown than anyone else's, always, regardless of alignment. Mastina had that right about Drixx and I.

You're still irrelevant to me Venmar, because I never went back to read your ISO in it's entirety.

-Cerb

I should clarify this: The first sentence should read "...never INTENTIONALLY protown."

-Cerb

In post 2365, Creature wrote:Are you seeing a comma?

didn't mean to be offensive here.

In post 2394, Creature wrote:

In post 2365, Creature wrote:Are you seeing a comma?

didn't mean to be offensive here.

<3

Thanks Creature. I was certainly being a bit over the top in my reaction to that. It just seemed like you were trying to make things difficult for no reason.

-Cerb

In post 2390, Reasonably Rational wrote:You're still irrelevant to me Venmar,

that is hella rude. i will not take that lying down, sir

So what now?

We just attempted to ignite the motor.

It's true though. I don't see you as having any influence on the game state, and I also don't believe you've stated any reads in a cogent enough fashion for me to care about them. You've asked some good questions and followed up on things and generally seem to be doing your own thing, but I don't actually see substantive thought behind your conclusions.

-Cerb