Mafiascum.net

If I wasn't voting you I'd consider voting someone lik Chkflip up

In post 2374, nomnomnom wrote: I'm not interested in lynching lurker slots on d1

You haven't completely come out of lurker status yourself from where I'm sitting.

You're fine letting a slot do nothing AI? How would you know if they're Scum or Town?

In post 2361, nomnomnom wrote:George doesn't feel like newb!town to me at all.
Where's the newb element in there?

Oh IDK... join date? Playstyle? The fact that there are <20 games in their threadcount and MOST of them are newbies?

None of these things shout "experienced" to me, bud.

You're better than this vote.

In post 2376, BooneyToonzExpert wrote:

In post 2374, nomnomnom wrote: I'm not interested in lynching lurker slots on d1

You haven't completely come out of lurker status yourself from where I'm sitting.

Don't see how that's relevant to what I said.

In post 2377, GeorgeBailey wrote:You're fine letting a slot do nothing AI? How would you know if they're Scum or Town?

Totally fine with that since their alignment will be clear soon enough.
First days are for making flip controversial slots in priority.

In post 2378, chkflip wrote:

In post 2361, nomnomnom wrote:George doesn't feel like newb!town to me at all.
Where's the newb element in there?

Oh IDK... join date? Playstyle? The fact that there are <20 games in their threadcount and MOST of them are newbies?

None of these things shout "experienced" to me, bud.

You're better than this vote.

Hm... I feel anger.

In post 2379, nomnomnom wrote:First days are for making flip controversial slots in priority.

If you really believed that, you'd be on the Vecna wagon.

In post 2379, nomnomnom wrote:Totally fine with that since their alignment will be clear soon enough.

How so? Will their alignment be revealed through my flip?

In post 2380, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 2379, nomnomnom wrote:First days are for making flip controversial slots in priority.

If you really believed that, you'd be on the Vecna wagon.

Nope.
I believe Vecna is town.

In post 2360, chkflip wrote:This seems like a really easy mislynch on newb!town to me, guys.

Exactly. GB's tone is pretty fine.

Chk, can you stash the whole Nancy thing for the day? I think Nancy's town and while I see your case, a large part of it is just how Nancy plays.

Nom, what did you make of Fonz' reasons to scumread KA?

Didn't think much of it otherwise I would have mentioned it.

In post 2379, nomnomnom wrote:First days are for making flip controversial slots in priority.

Go ahead and tell us your reasoning for GB!scum apart from that your heart wants you to go there.
I think you're saying he's polarized because some people want to lynch him and others don't, making it a useful information lynch - why will this not apply to lurkers?
Even if you wagoned KA, there will be some who join and some who don't, etc.

I wish Michael Scott was my boss

In post 2375, nomnomnom wrote:If I wasn't voting you I'd consider voting someone lik Chkflip up

Because they were "posting controversially"? Or is there any scumread involved?
If so, detail

In post 2387, GeorgeBailey wrote:I wish Michael Scott was my boss

A large part of my case was about how Nancy is well aware of her town meta and is using that to her advantage in this game, but sure. I've no qualms with ignoring that for a while. Expect it to keep coming up though seeing as now the insults have now succumbed to not only I'm "bad at mafia," but now I'm "never going to make it on mafiascum" which is fucking laughably insulting.

Pedit: my anger is "faked." That's all they've said.

That's my secret, Cap. I'm always angry.

{jjh, nomnomnom, Davesaz} seem like a bloc of people conveniently just townreading each other without any solid reasons.

In post 2376, BooneyToonzExpert wrote:

In post 2374, nomnomnom wrote: I'm not interested in lynching lurker slots on d1

You haven't completely come out of lurker status yourself from where I'm sitting.

Everyone below me in postcount should be on the hotseat. I've been here for 30 pages.

In post 2390, chkflip wrote:A large part of my case was about how Nancy is well aware of her town meta and is using that to her advantage in this game

She's of course aware of her town meta! But when she's trying to fake it she leaves a few tells.

I think GB's going with the flow of the game and not really having any strong opinion of his own.
His entire townpool has been people who have been talking, and his scumlean pool has been people that scumread him.
Clearly there's something wrong when a player can decisively say a lot of people are town yet doesn't have any true scumread.

I think going for a lurker right now distracts from the interactions that are happening right now and I think it's lowkey anti-town to distract from them for some random lurker lynch.
What's the purpose of voting for a slot that produces nothing on d1 when you have far more controversial slots who need sorting?

pedit:
chkflip's AtE regarding V/M felt fake and it felt like the type of AtE scum comes up with.
It could also be SvS considering I recognize what I did back in Cats with Vorkuta as my scum partner. Fake AtE bullshit at start of day 1 is the easiest way to seem genuine as scums, so maybe that's what it is but it's hard to say considering that I felt nancy's rage really genuine here.

I feel like there is a disconnect between nom's stated "Lynch controversial slots" rationale and the choice of George as their lynch target.

Every push nom has made has been wildly vague, but that's not really that surprising coming from a slot that didn't give a shit about this game until half the deadline for the day was through.

Pedit: hey look nom just described how Mars is playing. Ain't that somethin'?

In post 2391, Michael Scott wrote:{jjh, nomnomnom, Davesaz} seem like a bloc of people conveniently just townreading each other without any solid reasons.

I've given my reasons to townread Dave and I've talked about jjh, so you are wrong.

pedit: George has been far more active and I find their interactions problematic in this game, far more controversial of a slot than people like KA who haven't produced much content imo.

In post 2394, nomnomnom wrote:I think GB's going with the flow of the game and not really having any strong opinion of his own.
His entire townpool has been people who have been talking, and his scumlean pool has been people that scumread him.
Clearly there's something wrong when a player can decisively say a lot of people are town yet doesn't have any true scumread.

I think going for a lurker right now distracts from the interactions that are happening right now and I think it's lowkey anti-town to distract from them for some random lurker lynch.
What's the purpose of voting for a slot that produces nothing on d1 when you have far more controversial slots who need sorting?

pedit:
chkflip's AtE regarding V/M felt fake and it felt like the type of AtE scum comes up with.
It could also be SvS considering I recognize what I did back in Cats with Vorkuta as my scum partner. Fake AtE bullshit at start of day 1 is the easiest way to seem genuine as scums, so maybe that's what it is but it's hard to say considering that I felt nancy's rage really genuine here.

I'm going to assume you don't have an opinion on Chk's case since AtE was the only thing you took away from the conflict with Nancy.

In post 2397, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 2391, Michael Scott wrote:{jjh, nomnomnom, Davesaz} seem like a bloc of people conveniently just townreading each other without any solid reasons.

I've given my reasons to townread Dave and I've talked about jjh, so you are wrong.

pedit: George has been far more active and I find their interactions problematic in this game, far more controversial of a slot than people like KA who haven't produced much content imo.

Dunnstral is one of the heads of KA right?